Author Topic: Mitch Farmer  (Read 25336 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58595
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2009, 01:21:42 AM »
Does anyone know why he could not crack a game in 2009 ?
Obviously struggled this year but apparently he had some problem(s) while playing at Sturt (I don't know what they were) and he had to change SANFL clubs to South Adelaide where his form apparently picked up after the change.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98065
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2009, 01:55:16 AM »
Farmer info from the Port website:

News and video

On the Rise: Mitch Farmer 10/4/2008 - http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6038/newsid/57702/default.aspx

PTV: Future Star Mitch Farmer - Sturt vs Norwood 15/6/2008 - http://bigpondvideo.com/afl/60221

Farmer looks to be a 'keeper' 4/8/2008 - http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/News/NewsArticle/tabid/6038/newsid/64734/default.aspx

Meet Mitch Farmer 20/4/2009 - http://bigpondvideo.com/AFL/122216

PTV: SANFL action - Mitch Farmer for Sturt ressies 29/5/2009 - http://bigpondvideo.com/AFL/170501

PTV: SANFL action - #15 Mitch Farmer for South Adelaide 23/7/2009 - http://bigpondvideo.com/AFL/195057


2009 SANFL reports from Port's development coaches

R23: Mitch Farmer (for South v North @ Prospect) – Mitch played half back and on the ball, showing some real drive at the ball, but not consistently enough. He needs to get more of the ball to have a greater impact. He used the ball well with 7 kicks and 6 handballs.

R22: Mitch Farmer (for South v Port @ Noarlunga) – Mitch was again good playing half back and on the ball. He had 8 kicks, 5 marks, 10 handballs and a goal. He linked well moving out of defence and used the ball well. He pushed forward late in the game to kick a goal that helped the Panthers get across the line.

R21: Mitch Farmer (for South v Central @ Elizabeth) – Another good effort from Mitch, who has steadily improved since making the switch to South. Starting to win a bit more of the ball at the stoppages and providing some good rebound from defence. He finshed with 20 possessions and 4 tackles.



R20: MITCH Farmer’s move to South Adelaide is starting to reap the rewards, with the feisty defender showing speed and toughness rebounding from the Panthers’ backline and in the process winning the Cibo Glenelg SANFL Player of the Week Award for Round 20. The award is judged by Power development coaches, Darren Trevena and Stuart Cochrane, and is announced exclusively at PortAdelaideFC.com.au each week.

Cibo Glenelg SANFL Player of the Week
Mitch Farmer (for South v Eagles @ Thebarton) – An impressive game from Mitch, showing some of the speed we saw from him last year, rebounding from defence. He had 13 kicks, 6 handballs, 2 marks and 5 tackles. He worked up the ground to go inside 50 and give his teammates some scoring opportunities. He’s starting to find a nice mixture of defence and attack in his game and he’s slowly improving each week since moving to South.

R18: Mitch Farmer (for South v West @ Richmond) – Mitch worked hard in a side that was getting beaten pretty convincingly, with some good spoils in the backline. He provided some good run at times before moving to full back in the second half on a bigger opponent and did a good job. Finished with 12 possessions and 7 tackles.

R17: Mitch Farmer (for South v Norwood @ the Parade) – Mitch played on ex-Sydney player Simon Phillips and held him to just one goal. He worked hard on him and probably won his position in the end. He’s starting to get back to the level he was at towards the end of 2008.

R16: Mitch Farmer (for South v Sturt @ Noarlunga) – Probably Mitch’s best game for the year. He played down back and attacked the footy and the man hard, showing some good speed, something we haven’t really seen since lasty year. He beat his man all day, played some desperate footy – smothering and tackling – and was back closer to the level we expect of Mitch. Finished with 10 kicks, 4 marks, 4 handballs and a goal.

R15: Mitch Farmer (for South v Port @ Alberton) – A good game for Mitch after a slow start. He had 21 possessions, 5 tackles and a goal playing half back and a bit in the middle. He had some good in and under clearance work and looked very controlled down back for the Panthers.

R14: Mitch Farmer (for South v Glenelg @ the Bay) – Played half back and in the midfield and had an impact straight away when he came on. He tackled and chased hard but he needs to work on his endurance and also winning more of his own ball. Finished with 6 kicks, 5 handballs and an impressive 8 tackles.

R13: Mitch Farmer (for South v Central @ Noarlunga) – Mitch played his first league game for his new club, playing half forward and on the ball. His pressure all over the ground was good, chasing hard and applying 8 tackles. He’s still learning the structures of his new team but he regularly got to the right spots. He wasn’t always used but it was good to see he kept presenting. Finished with 1.1 and he’ll be looking to have a real impact for South for the remainder of the season.

R12: Mitch Farmer (for South reserves v Eagles reserves @ Noarlunga) – Mitch moved from Sturt to South to give himself a better opportunity to play league football and develop as a player. He played his first game for the Panthers on the weekend and impressed with 18 kicks, 6 handballs, 9 marks and 1.3 playing in the midfield and half forward. He showed some good intensity at the contest and could have topped his game off had he kicked a bit straighter.

R9: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v Norwood reserves @ the Parade) – Mitch’s best game for the year by a fair way. He played in the midfield and across the half forward flank, collecting 14 kicks, 6 handballs and taking 12 marks, to go with a very impressive 4.1. We were really impressed with his work ethic and if he can perform like that for a couple of weeks in a row, he’ll be up playing league.

R8: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v South reserves @ Unley) – Another good game from Mitch this week, playing a bit more up forward and finishing with 3 goals to go with 16 touches and 5 marks. He was intense at the contest and if he can play another few weeks like that, he’ll be up playing league, which is where we think he should be playing considering his talent.

R7: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v Eagles reserves @ Woodville) – A 17 touch game from Mitch, and although he started slowly, he worked his way into the game and played some tough footy with some good, hard tackling. He played on the ball and at half back and had a good impact at the stoppages. Will be looking for league selection soon.

R6: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v Port reserves @ Alberton) – Mitch’s best game for the year and it really started to look like the Farmer that we saw last year. Played in the middle and up forward, he ran hard, chased hard and looked lively. He finished with 14 kicks, 7 marks, 5 handballs and 2 goals. That’s the standard we expect of him and we’ve done a bit of extra work with him in showing him how he played last year and the things he needed to change to turn his form around. It’s pleasing to see him implement those things and if he can keep up that sort of form he’ll be back in the league side sooner rather than later.

R5: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v North reserves @ Unley) – Mitch handled the ball very well in some shocking conditions. Had limited opportunities to impact the game from the half back line, but did his best to rebound from defence finishing with 13 possessions and 3 tackles.

R3:
 Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v West reserves @ Unley) – Mitch played a bit on the back flank and also on ball. It was a clear improvement on last week and he’s now improving each week. He started to win a bit more of his own ball and also used the ball efficiently. If he can play four quarters of that football, he’ll be pushing for a league spot. Finished with 12 kicks, 6 marks and 5 handballs.

R2: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v Norwood reserves @ Unley) – Didn’t have a big influence in the first half but worked his way into the game in the second half when he started to win his own ball and link up well through the midfield. If he plays four quarters like that he’ll be pushing for league selection, which is where he’s capable of playing.

R1: Mitch Farmer (for Sturt reserves v Glenelg reserves @ the Bay) – Mitch played half back and wing and had 17 possessions in a solid game. He had a good influence whenever he was around the ball – going very hard at the contest – but we’d just like him to make a few more contests.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58595
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2009, 02:49:46 AM »
Could be a swap for Hughes or Schulz.
Yep makes sense Tucky. A direct swap with Sarge would advantageous as he's contracted for 2010. Cleve will be delisted anyhow if he isn't traded.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98065
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2009, 05:42:39 PM »
An article on Farmer from two months ago. Has he changed his mind since?

Farmer playing for his career
22 Jul 09 by Reece Homfray

POWER-listed midfielder Mitch Farmer says he is playing to save his AFL career after switching SANFL clubs mid-season.

After starring for Sturt and playing three AFL games with Port Adelaide last year, Farmer walked out on the Double Blues to join South Adelaide last month.

He requested a transfer after spending the first three months of the season in Sturt’s Reserves side.

The 20-year-old is out of contact with the Power at the end of the year and is desperate to remain with the club.

``I definitely want to stay at Port,’’ he said.

``It’s a great club and there’s a lot of guys coming through together.

``I want to prove a point that me changing (from Sturt to South) was for the better.’’

The No.49 pick from the Calder Cannons in the 2007 National Draft played against his old Sturt teammates for the first time on Saturday and said there were no ill-feelings.

``The main thing was that if I wanted to pursue an AFL career, I had to play League,’’ Farmer said.

``It was hard (leaving Sturt) because they’re all a great bunch of guys.

``And there’s definitely no hard feelings.

``On Saturday one of the Sturt supporters said `good luck Mitch’ to me in the warm up before the game and it put a smile on my face to hear that from someone at Sturt.

``And after the game I had a chat to the guys and wished them luck for the finals.’’

Farmer doesn’t blame Sturt for missing League selection this season, saying it was a combination of his poor form and the Double Blues’ depth that kept him out of the senior side.

``I won’t be the person who will say my form was the best or as good as it could have been,’’ he said.

``But making the change I’m playing League and finding my feet.

``And that (Sturt’s midfield depth) was another situation I had to deal with.

``To their (Sturt) credit they’ve got a great side and are going to go far in the finals.

``But at South I’m definitely getting that (League) opportunity.’’

Farmer is playing in defence for the Panthers and said he was happy at his new SANFL club.

``All the boys have been good and Clay (Sampson) has been great.

``He always rings during the week to see how the body pulled up and looking forward to the next game.’’

http://messenger-news.whereilive.com.au/sport/story/farmer-playing-for-his-career/

Offline peggles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2009, 10:50:45 PM »
wouldn't be surprised if he did change his mind. 

i mean brock mclean changed his mind pretty quickly, from forking out $10000 to save the dees to walking out on the club.

Offline camboon

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2009, 11:33:30 PM »
Dont get sucked in again by Port - we are their bitch - Thompson, Roden etc  - not worth trading with.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2009, 12:19:53 AM »
Dont get sucked in again by Port - we are their bitch - Thompson, Roden etc  - not worth trading with.
We never traded with Port for Rodan, we delisted him
Nothing wrong with Mitch, he'd be a good pickup

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5339
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2009, 01:26:09 AM »
stay at Port Adelaide Mitch!

 :)

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2009, 08:22:30 AM »
Please Richmond no

nothing wrong with him i hear some people say.

yes of course nothing wrong with Mclovin and Thompson either.

Rubbish players from other clubs that will get us real far wont it

Pass
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #24 on: September 25, 2009, 08:34:21 AM »
Please Richmond no

nothing wrong with him i hear some people say.

yes of course nothing wrong with Mclovin and Thompson either.

Rubbish players from other clubs that will get us real far wont it

Pass

I'm happy for them to do it, if it's a player for player trade.

McMuffin/Hughes/Pattison for Farmer would be fine.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2009, 11:55:11 AM »
Please Richmond no

nothing wrong with him i hear some people say.

yes of course nothing wrong with Mclovin and Thompson either.

Rubbish players from other clubs that will get us real far wont it

Pass
Stupid attitude, you can't rule out every trade because a couple were duds.

There was always PLENTY wrong with McMahon & Thomson had known flaws too, you should know this more than anyone (however plenty of time for Thomson to prove himself still)

Mitch is a hard at it back pocket with good skills. We need one of those. If we can get him at the same time as trading away someone like Hughes or Schulz then I'd think you'd be dancing a jig, not bagging the club. Although I know how much you like bagging the club.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2009, 12:52:21 PM »
How many games has he played at Port??

Last time i checked Port wasn't in the finals so i would've thought playing the kids would have been a priority.

Maybe he is not good enough

It must also be said this Mitch Farmer is a whopping 180 cms and wait for it. 77 kgs.

Yep sorry my mistake exactly what we need at our club

i think we have other needs at the moment more important than a reject from another club who cant string a game together

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Con65

  • Guest
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2009, 03:55:41 PM »
Agree with Daniel - we have more pressing needs at the moment.

I wasnt too happy with A. T. and wouldnt be that happy with this one either...

If you want to pick up re-cycled players...have a look at who the Saints have picked up:
(a) Ray #4 pick who def can play but didnt fit in with the doggies;
(b) King (for a song) Premiership ruckman
(c) Gardiner - AA and has played in a GF;
(d) Sneider- played in 2 GFs (i think - maybe just one).

These are players who have played plenty of footy, been high draft picks, AA, Grand Finals experience etc...so they draft re-cycled players with quality...did i miss anyone...oh yes...Dempster (they cut Fiora too).

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2009, 09:10:59 PM »
How many games has he played at Port??

Last time i checked Port wasn't in the finals so i would've thought playing the kids would have been a priority.

Maybe he is not good enough

It must also be said this Mitch Farmer is a whopping 180 cms and wait for it. 77 kgs.

Yep sorry my mistake exactly what we need at our club

i think we have other needs at the moment more important than a reject from another club who cant string a game together
So are you happy keeping Dean Polo as our back pocket to play on small defenders? Or is he one of the many duds you want to give the ass?
We always get cut up by small forwards, Dean has done ok this year but we need more in this position. I'm not saying we should trade picks for him, however if he wants to come home as reported and the trade can help facilitate the delisting of one of our (potentially contracted) duds, then I'm all for it.

If if came down to getting nothing for Hughes, or keeping Schulz instead of getting a young well skilled victorian defender from the 2007 draft, which would you choose?

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14035
Re: Mitch Farmer to Richmond?
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2009, 09:28:09 PM »
How many games has he played at Port??

Last time i checked Port wasn't in the finals so i would've thought playing the kids would have been a priority.

Maybe he is not good enough

It must also be said this Mitch Farmer is a whopping 180 cms and wait for it. 77 kgs.

Yep sorry my mistake exactly what we need at our club

i think we have other needs at the moment more important than a reject from another club who cant string a game together
So are you happy keeping Dean Polo as our back pocket to play on small defenders? Or is he one of the many duds you want to give the ass?
We always get cut up by small forwards, Dean has done ok this year but we need more in this position. I'm not saying we should trade picks for him, however if he wants to come home as reported and the trade can help facilitate the delisting of one of our (potentially contracted) duds, then I'm all for it.

If if came down to getting nothing for Hughes, or keeping Schulz instead of getting a young well skilled victorian defender from the 2007 draft, which would you choose?

if they want one of Schulz or Hughes as a direct swap then yes of course i would be for it but not if it means Farmer would occupy a spot ahead of another kid from the draft who hasnt had 3 years in the system. The money we save from a first year we can hire another development coach. I know which option i would choose ;)

Morton is the only recycled player in the last 10 years i can think of that has paid off for us. What does that tell you.

The failures
Mclovin
Knobel
Kingsley
Brown due to injury a failure none the less
Morrison
P Bowden
Graham
Thompson??
Hislop
Blumfield
Nichols

Lets just focus on the draft and only the draft for a few years and see how we go :thumbsup Its something that we dont do and then some wonder why we cant get it right

As for your comments regarding Polo. Well IMHO he is not a back pocket player at all. He should play forward from next year. Polo is a good player for us.

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.