Author Topic: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)  (Read 6330 times)

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #30 on: October 08, 2009, 11:21:38 PM »
i think we should take Sydney's Pick 6 and give them Tuck and Pick 19.

two picks in the first round (3 & 6) would be fantastic!

Dustin Martin and another midfielder or tall forward!

 :)

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #31 on: October 08, 2009, 11:25:48 PM »
You're delusional if you think that Tuck is worth that much.

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #32 on: October 08, 2009, 11:42:05 PM »
To be honest, I'd want a second pick upgrade as well.  Just not sure which picks we'll have left.

well we only have Pick 19 (Second Round), so to upgrade would be to either Sydney's Pick 6 or Pick 14 in the First Round.

which would leave us with Two First Round Picks and no Second Round Picks!

however i would take Pick 14 ---> Shane Tuck.

yes Pick 6 is high, but if we offer Pick 16 & Shane Tuck would be great!

Sydney at the moment only has 4 picks!

3 is the minimum.

 :)

be bold Richmond!

take Pick 6!

 :)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #33 on: October 09, 2009, 12:43:00 AM »








would be an outstanding result IMHO.

Alter that to picks 3, 19, 35, 40, 44 and PSD#2.



pick 40 is Geelongs isnt it ?
Yep it is. SEN told us first we upgraded pick 51 to 40 but they were wrong.

So it's back to picks 3, 19, 35, 44, 51 and PSD#2.

WAT if there's nothing available in the PSD then we can always use our next National draft pick 67 instead and forget about the PSD. It depends on what is available. I've heard we will use our PSD pick and get a bunch of players down to Tigerland and test them out first hand as we have done previously just prior to the PSD in mid-December.

And so far Geelong has ended up with these picks, 17, 28, 40 and 42  how do they do it..... yeah yeah more to trade but really what have they lost????? Add to that, they actually have pick 17 before our pick 19, pick 28 before our pick 35, pick 40 before our pick 44 and pick 42 before our pick 51.

Geeeezus other than pick 3 they have nailed it, we should have at least tried to upgrade some of those picks, I think we have failed a bit after looking at the pick comparisens!!!

DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #34 on: October 09, 2009, 01:38:06 AM »
Hopefully we can score another pick in the 20s involving Tucky :pray.


 :pray

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #35 on: October 09, 2009, 07:02:35 AM »
Hopefully we can score another pick in the 20s involving Tucky :pray.


 :pray

We are all praying but its gonna be difficult. Maybe Essendon will make a late play, maybe St Kilda if they get rid of Ball. Pattison is the one that Im hoping we may get something decent for in terms of draft pick. McMahon was always difficult coz he has a contract. Thanks Plough. At least he'll be gone in 12 months to.

richmondrules

  • Guest
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #36 on: October 09, 2009, 07:52:42 AM »
Some speculation that pick 19 may become pick 16 in a swap with Port as part of the deal for Schulz.

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #37 on: October 09, 2009, 07:59:45 AM »
Some speculation that pick 19 may become pick 16 in a swap with Port as part of the deal for Schulz.

not in you life

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #38 on: October 09, 2009, 09:55:45 AM »

And so far Geelong has ended up with these picks, 17, 28, 40 and 42  how do they do it..... yeah yeah more to trade but really what have they lost????? Add to that, they actually have pick 17 before our pick 19, pick 28 before our pick 35, pick 40 before our pick 44 and pick 42 before our pick 51.

Geeeezus other than pick 3 they have nailed it, we should have at least tried to upgrade some of those picks, I think we have failed a bit after looking at the pick comparisens!!!


All looks good until Ottens goes down with another injury (which is a very real possibility given his history).  Watch them struggle with Blake and no back up.  Their trading has not been without risk of getting it badly wrong either.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #39 on: October 09, 2009, 10:18:24 PM »
Thank the lord this didn't eventuate.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #40 on: October 09, 2009, 10:20:15 PM »

And so far Geelong has ended up with these picks, 17, 28, 40 and 42  how do they do it..... yeah yeah more to trade but really what have they lost????? Add to that, they actually have pick 17 before our pick 19, pick 28 before our pick 35, pick 40 before our pick 44 and pick 42 before our pick 51.

Geeeezus other than pick 3 they have nailed it, we should have at least tried to upgrade some of those picks, I think we have failed a bit after looking at the pick comparisens!!!


All looks good until Ottens goes down with another injury (which is a very real possibility given his history).  Watch them struggle with Blake and no back up.  Their trading has not been without risk of getting it badly wrong either.
What about West? He is still on thier list isn't he or did they get a first rounder for him to!

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond's Pick 19 going elsewhere (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #41 on: October 09, 2009, 10:59:12 PM »

All looks good until Ottens goes down with another injury (which is a very real possibility given his history).  Watch them struggle with Blake and no back up.  Their trading has not been without risk of getting it badly wrong either.
What about West? He is still on thier list isn't he or did they get a first rounder for him to!

 :)  The way it all fell into place for them you wouldn't be surprised!

Yep, he's still there.  Turns 22 next weekend and his career stats so far read 7 games (1 in '09 - R3), averages 0.9 kicks, 1.9 marks, 4.1 handballs, 7.6 hitouts.  He stands 198cm tall.

Let's compare him to Pattison.  Turned 23 in March, 61 games (8 in '09), averages 4.4 kicks, 3.9 marks, 6.6 handballs, 6.9 hitouts.  He stands 198cm tall.

Or Graham.  Turned 22 in April, 18 games (16 in '09), averages 2.7 kicks, 3.2 marks, 5.9 handballs, 13.6 hitouts.  He stands 201cm tall.

As I said, if Ottens goes down then Geelong are in a world of hurt unless they unearth another Mumford - Blake is not good enough to carry the ruck for that team for another tilt at a flag.