Author Topic: Matt Dea [merged]  (Read 149704 times)

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4848
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #915 on: July 15, 2012, 12:26:32 AM »
I would agree but if you think Matt Dea is anywhere near our best 22.  .your dreaming
He got flogged tonight
The 5 worse?
Webberley
Graham
Derrickx
Who else ?

According to you at 3 qt time Conca was still poor. So there's 4 :lol :rollin :lol

Give me a spell
Just watched the replay twice
Concas kicking is a disgrace

 :sleep :sleep and here is why the club gave you the arse  :lol

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #916 on: July 15, 2012, 12:28:17 AM »
I would agree but if you think Matt Dea is anywhere near our best 22.  .your dreaming
He got flogged tonight
The 5 worse?
Webberley
Graham
Derrickx
Who else ?

According to you at 3 qt time Conca was still poor. So there's 4 :lol :rollin :lol

Give me a spell
Just watched the replay twice
Concas kicking is a disgrace

Sometimes Jack you need to stop finding scapegoats.

Conca was great in the 2nd half.

You were harping on at 3qt time that Conca's 3rd quarter was merely against the bottom team to

smokescreen the fact he had lifted his game to an apporpriate level.

Conca was going at 70% with 23 touches.

Jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #917 on: July 15, 2012, 12:29:55 AM »
Yep.and the 30% went to the opposition
Remember we lost to the bottom team tonight

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4848
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #918 on: July 15, 2012, 12:36:01 AM »
Yep.and the 30% went to the opposition
Remember we lost to the bottom team tonight

Que the Dead Horse emicon :sleep :sleep

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #919 on: July 15, 2012, 12:36:13 AM »
Yep.and the 30% went to the opposition
Remember we lost to the bottom team tonight


Six players had worse disposal efficiency yet Webberley, Graham and Derickx who were all so much poorer than Reece had better disposal efficiency despite the fact that Reece had 23 touches which is more than the other 3 combined.

Use the we lost to bottom team tonight to get the panicky point across.

That should fire up the rank and files to dump manure on the club.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #920 on: July 15, 2012, 04:30:32 AM »
At least dea put his head over the ball.

We lost to a team of squibs.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #921 on: July 15, 2012, 05:47:33 AM »
Dud, delist.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #922 on: July 29, 2012, 08:31:12 PM »
How much longer do we have to persevere with the Matt Dea experiment? He is still being gifted games-at what point will he have to earn his spot? I feel sorry for the other defenders, it's as if they are playing one short.

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #923 on: July 29, 2012, 08:33:33 PM »
How much longer do we have to persevere with the Matt Dea experiment? He is still being gifted games-at what point will he have to earn his spot? I feel sorry for the other defenders, it's as if they are playing one short.

Because its a good movie title?
There are dea-lectable play on word games?
We hate the number 7?

It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #924 on: July 30, 2012, 12:17:02 AM »
To be honest dont know what the club sees in him.Kills us with his bad kicks.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #925 on: July 31, 2012, 02:26:24 AM »
Interesting player. A bit to work with.

Offline georgies31

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #926 on: July 31, 2012, 03:31:11 AM »
Didnt the club have  a policy if you cant kick you wont get recruited or picked.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #927 on: July 31, 2012, 09:50:23 AM »
Didnt the club have  a policy if you cant kick you wont get recruited or picked.

Dea's kicking isn't great but we've got plenty of other's who are struggling to hit a target atm. Some our supposed elite kicks. What strikes me most about Matt are his clean hands. Every so often does something to make you really sit up and take notice. He's a 20 year old just 19 games into his career. This is a development phase for him. May not make it but I see enough to persevere for a while yet..

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #928 on: July 31, 2012, 03:15:08 PM »
I actually haven't noticed him as much, which is a good thing. Less mistakes and I think he is becoming more confident.

Offline Big Papa Bear

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Matt Dea [merged]
« Reply #929 on: August 01, 2012, 01:17:11 PM »
His disposal efficiency is at 77.78% which is ranked 10th at the club. Has started to show a bit and has good promise