Author Topic: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is  (Read 11784 times)

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #75 on: March 14, 2010, 07:28:00 PM »
Well its betterb than someone who cant get it, have you watched Angus Grahams last 2 games, NO POSSESIONS

How many hitouts did Tucky have? ::)
Not sure why you're comparing the no. of possessions of an on baller to a KPP and a ruckman but anyway..
Tuck will be replaced by another face sooner rather than later.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #76 on: March 14, 2010, 07:29:03 PM »
i agree that tucky is harshly dealt with, would make a decent HFF with good o/head marking and nice kick...could do plenty worse
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #77 on: March 14, 2010, 07:30:04 PM »
At least Tuckcan mark , and get the ball in dispute, Gus Graham does NEITHER

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #78 on: March 14, 2010, 07:34:07 PM »
i agree that tucky is harshly dealt with, would make a decent HFF with good o/head marking and nice kick...could do plenty worse

I think we have better & younger half forwards than Tuck.
That's not where our weaknesses lie.
Still I'd play him ahead of that spud Hislop.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #79 on: March 14, 2010, 07:45:31 PM »
i agree that tucky is harshly dealt with, would make a decent HFF with good o/head marking and nice kick...could do plenty worse

I think we have better & younger half forwards than Tuck.
That's not where our weaknesses lie.
Still I'd play him ahead of that spud Hislop.

Anyone with half a brain could see the Tuck would be an asset in F50,
Can take a contested mark and is a great kick for goal, for some unknown reason goes un-noticed

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #80 on: March 14, 2010, 08:04:18 PM »
not by everyone jack
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #81 on: March 14, 2010, 09:55:32 PM »
Anyone with half a brain could see the Tuck would be an asset in F50

Pffftt. That's why he's spent sooo much time there to date. ::)
Like I said, we've better AND more promising options than Tuck at HF.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #82 on: March 15, 2010, 07:23:21 PM »
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #83 on: March 15, 2010, 07:48:49 PM »
Anyone with half a brain could see the Tuck would be an asset in F50

Pffftt. That's why he's spent sooo much time there to date. ::)
Like I said, we've better AND more promising options than Tuck at HF.

And thats why the club as Benny Gale has said has been a collective FAILURE.
They have no vision at Punt Road.
Unfortunately you have to work with the talent or lack of talent you have on your list.
Tuck at least has a go and to play him inside F 50m would be no risk to the club or the player, what they have to lose
They even tried Rance down there against Collingwood in the practise match until he was taken off the ground for good.
What I have seen in the practice matches , they aint too many options

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58605
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is
« Reply #84 on: March 15, 2010, 07:52:34 PM »
Polly a touch lucky as stats wise he hasn't done much but it's a good news story. Obviously we want a big body to take the No.1 opposition defender out of the play to free up Jack and Morton.

Well done Relts. Still needs to build up his fitness to outlast a full game but he provides a spark and pace that our forward lacks.

Hopefully Contin gets his chance in the second half of the season when we can promote another rookie without a LTI.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is
« Reply #85 on: March 15, 2010, 08:17:40 PM »
I'm very pleased for Relton, he's been one of the big positives to come out of the pre-season. As for Polak, although I'm not surprised by this, I can't agree with the decision. He just hasn't shown enough for me. I'd rather have brought on David Gourdis as a key defender. His pre-season form has been excellent, which even Hardwick has acknowledged, and he's just the type of tall, strong body we need in an undersized, understrength backline (particularly with Rance not coming on as we'd have hoped.)

the claw

  • Guest
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is
« Reply #86 on: March 15, 2010, 08:41:28 PM »
so they promote a 8 yr failure who as done nothing at all pre season to deserve promotion. we dont need feel good stories we need RUTHLESS list management.  and a bloke who struggles to run  100 metres without keeling over.
ah well some things just dont change at the rabble footy club.oh and this is in no way having a go at roberts but his fitness levels suggest it would be a risk taking him into any game atm. so why not wait till rnd 11 when he has built a base.
oh no we cant do that that would be common sense.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is
« Reply #87 on: March 15, 2010, 09:39:12 PM »
so they promote a 8 yr failure who as done nothing at all pre season to deserve promotion. we dont need feel good stories we need RUTHLESS list management. 

Agree claw. Not happy with the decision to promote Polak.
Less of an issue with Roberts. Provides a spark we lack at HF.

Offline 3121

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion
« Reply #88 on: March 15, 2010, 09:46:27 PM »
Anyone with half a brain could see the Tuck would be an asset in F50,

 :gobdrop The Wallace era is over.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: 2 Rookie Promotion - Polak and Roberts it is
« Reply #89 on: March 15, 2010, 09:49:29 PM »
Well done to both the boys, lets hope they have a great year.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"