Author Topic: D. Hardwick  (Read 11229 times)

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2010, 08:51:02 PM »
We usually bag the players but here is a decent whack!
D. Hardwick.
ONLY positional change for the night was putting Simmonds are forward in the last 10 minutes of the game when he was completely SPENT.
How on earth can you play the same 6 players inside F50 and D50 for the entire game has got me beat.- especially when your getting FLOGGED
Then coached the second half from the bench and took notes and looked at the laptop the guy beside him was holding. ::) ::) ::)
Will say this, both B.Scott and D. Hardwicks coaching efforts this weekend were terrible.
We had players in the first quarter who""patsy caked "" the ball instead of grabbing it and taking punishment from the opposition and they werent even dragged.
Thats Auskick stuff :banghead
NEVER EVER want to see Nahas again either. Schoolboy footballer

no worries coach

Well tell me all you internet GENIUSES.
Why wouldnt you make changes and see what you have with the playing group.
Way too predictable are the tiges.
Wont win a game  if they are going to dish this up every week
\


the fact that you even need this explained to you makes me relieved your no longer there  :thumbsup

it was already answered - 3rd post master coach. Result is irrelevant, giving players an extended run in the same position whether they are being flogged or not will give the coach his data. No point moving them around and making the big moves this season duh.
Better to have them exposed for the frauds that they are without a shadow of a doubt rather than hide them when the going gets tough. Didn't these same players want Terry removed bc they kept being moved around and felt the didn't have a set game plan/positions they could get used to? They've been banging on about this super new game plan all summer saying how good it is to have defined roles, well now sink or swim smartar.ses

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2010, 08:51:11 PM »
Did Melbourne play everyone behind the ball ??? NO

Offline 3121

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2010, 08:52:26 PM »
Absolute rubbish.  If you think that was the only positional change you mentioned (Simmo) then you know jack about the game. Another rubbish thread.  You sound as if you stayed home and watched it!

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2010, 08:53:00 PM »
We usually bag the players but here is a decent whack!
D. Hardwick.
ONLY positional change for the night was putting Simmonds are forward in the last 10 minutes of the game when he was completely SPENT.
How on earth can you play the same 6 players inside F50 and D50 for the entire game has got me beat.- especially when your getting FLOGGED
Then coached the second half from the bench and took notes and looked at the laptop the guy beside him was holding. ::) ::) ::)
Will say this, both B.Scott and D. Hardwicks coaching efforts this weekend were terrible.
We had players in the first quarter who""patsy caked "" the ball instead of grabbing it and taking punishment from the opposition and they werent even dragged.
Thats Auskick stuff :banghead
NEVER EVER want to see Nahas again either. Schoolboy footballer

no worries coach

Well tell me all you internet GENIUSES.
Why wouldnt you make changes and see what you have with the playing group.
Way too predictable are the tiges.
Wont win a game  if they are going to dish this up every week
\


the fact that you even need this explained to you makes me relieved your no longer there  :thumbsup

it was already answered - 3rd post master coach. Result is irrelevant, giving players an extended run in the same position whether they are being flogged or not will give the coach his data. No point moving them around and making the big moves this season duh.
Better to have them exposed for the frauds that they are without a shadow of a doubt rather than hide them when the going gets tough. Didn't these same players want Terry removed bc they kept being moved around and felt the didn't have a set game plan/positions they could get used to? They've been banging on about this super new game plan all summer saying how good it is to have defined roles, well now sink or swim smartbehinds

Results are irrelevant ?? WANT PLANET YOU ON !

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2010, 08:54:10 PM »
both are young inexperienced coaches they will both make mistakes but its important we stick by our coach, he gives the impression that he knows where he wants to go and how to get there, there will be mistakes, there will be hurdles and roadblocks, but If the club sticks together then maybe they can find a way through.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2010, 08:54:25 PM »
Absolute rubbish.  If you think that was the only positional change you mentioned (Simmo) then you know jack about the game. Another rubbish thread.  You sound as if you stayed home and watched it!

Only position change from the game., oH sorry, just checked my notes, Post down back for 5 mins in last quarter.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2010, 08:55:23 PM »
both are young inexperienced coaches they will both make mistakes but its important we stick by our coach, he gives the impression that he knows where he wants to go and how to get there, there will be mistakes, there will be hurdles and roadblocks, but If the club sticks together then maybe they can find a way through.

As anyone ever thought he mighten by able to coach ::)

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2010, 08:55:52 PM »
spot on DH needs to work out quick enough who's is in this for the long haul, already Im seeing players fall by the wayside in Nahas , Thomson and a couple mof others, I reckon Hislop was moved into a new posi to quite good effect...and agree that players need an extended run at it  demonstrate one way or the other if they are up to it, we dont need to give them anywhere to hide
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #23 on: April 04, 2010, 08:56:29 PM »
We usually bag the players but here is a decent whack!
D. Hardwick.
ONLY positional change for the night was putting Simmonds are forward in the last 10 minutes of the game when he was completely SPENT.
How on earth can you play the same 6 players inside F50 and D50 for the entire game has got me beat.- especially when your getting FLOGGED
Then coached the second half from the bench and took notes and looked at the laptop the guy beside him was holding. ::) ::) ::)
Will say this, both B.Scott and D. Hardwicks coaching efforts this weekend were terrible.
We had players in the first quarter who""patsy caked "" the ball instead of grabbing it and taking punishment from the opposition and they werent even dragged.
Thats Auskick stuff :banghead
NEVER EVER want to see Nahas again either. Schoolboy footballer

no worries coach

Well tell me all you internet GENIUSES.
Why wouldnt you make changes and see what you have with the playing group.
Way too predictable are the tiges.
Wont win a game  if they are going to dish this up every week
\


the fact that you even need this explained to you makes me relieved your no longer there  :thumbsup

it was already answered - 3rd post master coach. Result is irrelevant, giving players an extended run in the same position whether they are being flogged or not will give the coach his data. No point moving them around and making the big moves this season duh.
Better to have them exposed for the frauds that they are without a shadow of a doubt rather than hide them when the going gets tough. Didn't these same players want Terry removed bc they kept being moved around and felt the didn't have a set game plan/positions they could get used to? They've been banging on about this super new game plan all summer saying how good it is to have defined roles, well now sink or swim smartbehinds

Results are irrelevant ?? WANT PLANET YOU ON !

No wonder you were moved on, the games passed you by obviously

what a waste of time reading your rubbish

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #24 on: April 04, 2010, 08:57:16 PM »
both are young inexperienced coaches they will both make mistakes but its important we stick by our coach, he gives the impression that he knows where he wants to go and how to get there, there will be mistakes, there will be hurdles and roadblocks, but If the club sticks together then maybe they can find a way through.

As anyone ever thought he mighten by able to coach ::)

God could coach us and we'd still be poo!

Offline 3121

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2010, 08:57:42 PM »
Only position change from the game., oH sorry, just checked my notes, Post down back for 5 mins in last quarter.

Fair dinkum you are a flog.  

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2010, 08:59:29 PM »
Only position change from the game., oH sorry, just checked my notes, Post down back for 5 mins in last quarter.

Fair dinkum you are a flog.  

You might find that what I posted is 100% correct.
Watch the replay.write down the starting 6 inside F50 and D 50 and the interchange.
This isnt good.

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2010, 09:01:23 PM »
spot on DH needs to work out quick enough who's is in this for the long haul, already Im seeing players fall by the wayside in Nahas , Thomson and a couple mof others, I reckon Hislop was moved into a new posi to quite good effect...and agree that players need an extended run at it  demonstrate one way or the other if they are up to it, we dont need to give them anywhere to hide

Im glad some can see the logic, its fantastic bo bc for mine there were a fair few players I could have gone either way on over the summer and several of them have been clearly exposed already instead of hiding them in different roles in which case I was often left with a "well he showed a little here and a bit over there", this way is brutal to endure but I'd be surprised if a few didn't already have a line going through their name  :clapping

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #28 on: April 04, 2010, 09:02:16 PM »
The result did not matter.

I actually thought the effort without the ball was good. We worked hard running back filling the space in front of Hall and our one percenters were there. Something we have not been accountable in.

Our problem lies when we do have the ball and that is because we turn it over and our decision making is poor. Something Dimma is working hard on.

Would rather watch the kids learn by being thrown in the deep end and asked to see how they cope with it rather than sensationalise everything and overreact to a 12 goal loss to the pre season premiership favourite. I would rather lose with kids by 12 goals and know there is an up side than lose by 12 goals with an experienced side and then say he needs to get rid of this this and that and we are nowhere. We are closer tonight to where we need to be with another game into the kids than where we were last game.

If someone told you the dogs were a 12 goal better side than us two weeks ago you wouldn't disagree. Why sensationalise it now and ask for the coaches head when clearly we are two years into a three year deal with the youngest list in the league.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: D. Hardwick
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2010, 09:06:29 PM »
I thought the bulldogs were off tonight I might add.. If it was Docklands, it would of been 20 goals