Author Topic: Changes next week for the Swannies game?  (Read 7845 times)

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2010, 11:47:15 AM »
after watching coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2010, 11:59:56 AM »
after watching a half of coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Edited for accuracy.
EAT EM ALIVE!

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2010, 12:04:53 PM »
after watching a half of coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Edited for accuracy.

Yep ,and I seen enough in a half of football,
Rance at Full Foward ::)
Graham hopeless.
I actually would play Polak although I dont know where ?

Offline rufio_1991

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
  • #23
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #18 on: April 05, 2010, 12:43:00 PM »
OUT: Farmer, King, Nahas
In: Polak, Tuck, Cousins (If Available) If not, White.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #19 on: April 05, 2010, 12:47:31 PM »
OUT: Farmer, King, Nahas
In: Polak, Tuck, Cousins (If Available) If not, White.

Add Edwards out to that lot with Polo in and I agree with your other selections. Maybe even Webberly in for Post.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13303
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2010, 01:31:52 PM »
OUT: Farmer, King, Nahas
In: Polak, Tuck, Cousins (If Available) If not, White.

White, no thanks I already get enough excitement out of Jacko kicking the ball

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2010, 02:56:41 PM »
it really makes no difference who is in or out (exception of Cousins)
cause they all as bad as each other  ;D


Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2010, 03:35:36 PM »
after watching a half of coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Edited for accuracy.

Yep ,and I seen enough in a half of football,
Rance at Full Foward ::)
Graham hopeless.
I actually would play Polak although I dont know where ?
Rance got significantly better in the 2nd half once he had some confidence.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40271
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2010, 03:59:13 PM »
Outs: Nahas, Farmer, Simmonds, King

Ins: Polo, BrownE, Webberley Cousins,  (if fit, if not Tuck or White)
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2010, 06:33:59 PM »
after watching coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Let's stick with Simmonds then, because he's in such scintillating form, and is obviously the future of our club.

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #25 on: April 05, 2010, 06:38:59 PM »
after watching coburg on sat.
couldnt possibly play Browne, Graham, Rance.

Let's stick with Simmonds then, because he's in such scintillating form, and is obviously the future of our club.

Mate, if you think Simmonds is bad, you should look at the other 2.
It took Graham 3 games to get a possesion :banghead :banghead :banghead.
And I cannot understand why Graham spent 70% of each quarter on the ground and Browne 30% at Coburg on sat :banghead
Need to keep both on the ground for a long as possible, both struggle with endurance

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #26 on: April 05, 2010, 07:04:37 PM »
we have no rucks simmonds, graham and browne not up to it imho. vickery needs time, in november we should pick up a 25yo bash and crash type ruck out of a state league with our last pick and then another 1 in the psd.

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #27 on: April 05, 2010, 07:06:16 PM »
Yeah Jackster, I was at the Whitten Oval on Saturday too, and I agree with you. Neither Gus or Browne showed anything to write home about.
But I'd like to just bite the bullet and bring them both in, so we can have a three way ruck/fwd/bench rotation thing happening with Vickery too.
But then again, I'm the official " let's play all the kids" advocate on this forum ;D
  

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #28 on: April 05, 2010, 07:06:32 PM »
we have no rucks simmonds, graham and browne not up to it imho. vickery needs time, in november we should pick up a 25yo bash and crash type ruck out of a state league with our last pick and then another 1 in the psd.

Should of picked up Mumford, pointless talking about it now though

Offline crannyvegas

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Changes next week for the Swannies game?
« Reply #29 on: April 05, 2010, 07:26:24 PM »
we have no rucks simmonds, graham and browne not up to it imho. vickery needs time, in november we should pick up a 25yo bash and crash type ruck out of a state league with our last pick and then another 1 in the psd.

Should of picked up Mumford, pointless talking about it now though

Would have cost us either B Griffiths or D Astbury to obtain Mumford. He came at a bit of price, but i do think we should have at least grabbed one in the rookie draft instead of jockeys and what have you.
Detka! Detka! Detka!