Author Topic: Who are the next 10 to get the arse?  (Read 9221 times)

Ramps

  • Guest
Who are the next 10 to get the arse?
« on: April 20, 2010, 02:15:18 PM »
In order who are the next 10 to get the arse from the RFC?

1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-

Please place your selections in order!

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7361
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2010, 02:20:00 PM »
Like I said - I would go some overpaid 'big names' and free up some cash to go shopping - let me think about it.

Offline taztiger4

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
  • Shovelheads - Keeping hipsters off Harley's
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2010, 02:29:44 PM »
Polak
Cousins
King
Mcmahon
Gilligan
White
Tuck
Hislop
Thomson
Simmons

In no particular order

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2010, 02:29:50 PM »
1- Edwards......... :pray
2- McMahon
3- King
4- Gilligan
5- Tuck
6- Simmonds
7- Graham
8- Thompson
9- Polak
10- White

Cousins will retire!!

The very lucky list: Polo, Hislop, Nahas, Gourdis, Connors
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline tigersalive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2010, 02:35:19 PM »
1- McMahon (Delist)
2- King (Delist)
3- Simmonds (Delist)
4- Polak (Delist)
5- Tuck (Delist)
6- Graham (Delist)
7- Nahas (Delist)
8- Connors (who knows)
9- Cousins (retire)
10- Jackson (trade)
EAT EM ALIVE!

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4803
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2010, 03:09:04 PM »
Why only 10 Ramps ?
Unleash the tornado

Ramps

  • Guest
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2010, 03:22:54 PM »
Why only 10 Ramps ?

Coz we dont have all day to be putting up lists of 20 or 25  ;D

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8466
  • In Absentia
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2010, 03:34:58 PM »
In order who are the next 10 to get the behind from the RFC?

1- McMahon
2- Simmonds
3- Graham
4- Cousins
5- White
6- Polak
7- Tuck
8- King
9-
10-

I actually don't think they'll cut as hard as last year, they might try and trade a Tambling or Jackson as well.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2010, 04:29:06 PM »
1/ March
2/ O'Shannassy
3/ Gary Cameron.
4/ Lord
5/ Matthies
6/ Dalton
7/ Haines
8/ Free
9/ Chadwick.

Why ? well someone has to be responsible for the mess we are in.
And most listed have been there for long enough !

Offline jezza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2010, 05:47:38 PM »
Cousins
Hislop
King
McMahon
Polak
Simmonds
Thomson
Tuck
White
Gilligan

Lucky:
Connors
Graham
Nahas
Jackson

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2010, 06:09:47 PM »
In order who are the next 10 to get the behind from the RFC?

1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-

Please place your selections in order!

1-  McMahon, Jordan
2-  Polak, Graham (R)
3-  Simmonds, Troy
4-  King, Jake
5-  Thomson, Adam
6-  White, Matthew
7-  Hislop, Tom
8-
9-
10-

Those are my 7.

Not sure what good it would do getting rid of Cousins, Tuck, Gilligan, Graham etc. at this stage

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2010, 06:25:43 PM »
Given the ongoing tail chasing debate about Tucky, I came up this list based on who I believe have less to offer than tuck. ;D :whistle (I was curious to see if i would come up with ten or not)

  • mcmahon
  • king
  • white
  • Graham
  • nahas
  • thompson
  • hislop
  • edwards
  • rance
  • jackson

left off simmonds as he will retire, not be given the big A


“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2010, 06:38:47 PM »
Polak
Cousins
King
Mcmahon
Gilligan
White
Tuck
Hislop
Thomson
Simmons

In no particular order

might be spot on with that, I hope gilligan can be sorted out but losing faith and Im hoping Hislop may improve but that is prob only a 50/50 chance...Ive given up on thomo, no questions on the others
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2010, 07:14:05 PM »
In order who are the next 10 to get the behind from the RFC?

1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-

Please place your selections in order!

1-  McMahon, Jordan
2-  Polak, Graham (R)
3-  Simmonds, Troy
4-  King, Jake
5-  Thomson, Adam
6-  White, Matthew
7-  Hislop, Tom
8-
9-
10-

Those are my 7.

Not sure what good it would do getting rid of Cousins, Tuck, Gilligan, Graham etc. at this stage

Graham, please ::)
Gillgan, , is he still at punt road ???

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Who are the next 10 to get the behind?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2010, 07:25:01 PM »
gilligan??? is he still alive,or still maroned on a desert isle