Author Topic: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11  (Read 4683 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #30 on: July 11, 2010, 04:05:07 PM »
A point a difference. 70 - 71


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #31 on: July 11, 2010, 04:09:35 PM »
3/4 time

Coburg   6.0    8.6   10.10-70
C'wood   4.2    7.6   10.11-71


Goals: Post 2, Carnell 2, Kadhlefelt, Puiselli, Allen, Hicks, Lawton, Clifton

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #32 on: July 11, 2010, 04:22:43 PM »
In the middle of it cutting in and out they said "shoulder" ....... "blood rule" ........ "No 82 Coburg"

So make of that what you can  :-\

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #33 on: July 11, 2010, 04:28:05 PM »
Rance laid a great tackle but there's a downfield free against O'Reilly off the ball to Medhurst. Point luckily

10 mins Q4

71 - 74


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #34 on: July 11, 2010, 04:32:28 PM »
Mistake with communication in defence causes a dumb turnover and Pies goal  :scream.

71 - 81

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #35 on: July 11, 2010, 04:39:06 PM »
Gone!

71 - 88


19 mins Q4


Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #36 on: July 11, 2010, 04:45:46 PM »
Goal-less final quarter. WP says it was shocking.


Final Score

Coburg   6.0    8.6   10.10    10.11-71
C'wood   4.2    7.6   10.11    13.17-95


Goals: Post 2, Carnell 2, Kadhlefelt, Puiselli, Allen, Hicks, Lawton, Clifton

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #37 on: July 11, 2010, 05:01:00 PM »
On the back of that game do you think Post deserves an opportunity replacing Griffiths in the forwardline or in the backline so Astbury can go forward?

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #38 on: July 11, 2010, 05:06:49 PM »
WP says "NO" to your question Stripes


WP's bests: Polo, Morton, Browne, Rance


Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #39 on: July 11, 2010, 05:25:20 PM »
Disappointing given it was a winnable game being up a goal at half-time. We really didn't make the most of our two quarters with the breeze. Wasted the first 10 minutes in the first quarter and did bugger all in the third with it.

Going by the commentary only Rance and Browne showed anything today. Browne had to ruck against Fraser and Wood and Rance worked hard in defence. Post looked lively in the first but didn't appear to have much of an impact after that. Contin got a "not too bad" from the commentators. Jordie and Polo were Jordie and Polo.

All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline the_boy_jake

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #40 on: July 11, 2010, 05:25:59 PM »
Gourdis or Rance in for Griffo then?

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #41 on: July 11, 2010, 05:34:34 PM »
Disappointing given it was a winnable game being up a goal at half-time. We really didn't make the most of our two quarters with the breeze. Wasted the first 10 minutes in the first quarter and did bugger all in the third with it.

Going by the commentary only Rance and Browne showed anything today. Browne had to ruck against Fraser and Wood and Rance worked hard in defence. Post looked lively in the first but didn't appear to have much of an impact after that. Contin got a "not too bad" from the commentators. Jordie and Polo were Jordie and Polo.

Thanks OE and WP! If ever there was a game to shine it was this one. I'll be interested to see if they play him anyway but I hope not. I would love to Gourdis get a chance otherwise, going on your report, Rance.

The In's and outs will be worth waiting for. :D

Stripes

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #42 on: July 11, 2010, 05:41:19 PM »
Disappointing given it was a winnable game being up a goal at half-time. We really didn't make the most of our two quarters with the breeze. Wasted the first 10 minutes in the first quarter and did bugger all in the third with it.

Going by the commentary only Rance and Browne showed anything today. Browne had to ruck against Fraser and Wood and Rance worked hard in defence. Post looked lively in the first but didn't appear to have much of an impact after that. Contin got a "not too bad" from the commentators. Jordie and Polo were Jordie and Polo.

Thanks OE and WP! If ever there was a game to shine it was this one. I'll be interested to see if they play him anyway but I hope not. I would love to Gourdis get a chance otherwise, going on your report, Rance.

The In's and outs will be worth waiting for. :D

Stripes
The problem for Goo and Rance is our defence is playing well so there's no room in the inn for them to come in. They're not forwards either so yeah the ins and outs this week are going to be interesting.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

jackstar is back again

  • Guest
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #43 on: July 11, 2010, 05:41:46 PM »
On the back of that game do you think Post deserves an opportunity replacing Griffiths in the forwardline or in the backline so Astbury can go forward?

Post will play next week apparently ;)

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Coburg vs Collingwood, Sunday July 11
« Reply #44 on: July 11, 2010, 06:02:50 PM »
Disappointing given it was a winnable game being up a goal at half-time. We really didn't make the most of our two quarters with the breeze. Wasted the first 10 minutes in the first quarter and did bugger all in the third with it.

Going by the commentary only Rance and Browne showed anything today. Browne had to ruck against Fraser and Wood and Rance worked hard in defence. Post looked lively in the first but didn't appear to have much of an impact after that. Contin got a "not too bad" from the commentators. Jordie and Polo were Jordie and Polo.

Thanks OE and WP! If ever there was a game to shine it was this one. I'll be interested to see if they play him anyway but I hope not. I would love to Gourdis get a chance otherwise, going on your report, Rance.

The In's and outs will be worth waiting for. :D

Stripes
The problem for Goo and Rance is our defence is playing well so there's no room in the inn for them to come in. They're not forwards either so yeah the ins and outs this week are going to be interesting.
If post doesnt come in, astbury could go forward for either of them to come in - assuming griffiths wont play.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI