I can't understand how a legal entity failed to prove Trents case...
Did no-one think to bring up that if Trent elected to go to wrap up Wright that it would have been 50 metres cause he wasnt in the contact? Whats he meant to do run past him with his inertia and let him play on? I'm sick of it.
Four weeks seems very harsh, but you are kidding yourself if you think that Trent had no option but to barrel Wright. Let's be honest, he lined him up and put him down, and had the option to pull up or make it look like an attempted spoil.
So...the current rule, whether we like it or not, is that if you elect to bump and have other options, then you must be prepared to run the risk of doing incidental or accidental damage to your opponent, and paying the consequences.
Should have taken the 3 in the current climate, even though it is clear that the initial contact wasn't high.