Author Topic: Connors Vs Tambling  (Read 5604 times)

bushranger

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2010, 10:33:01 AM »
Connor's is way out in front for me.
Oh that's right I'm not a fan of Tambling.
So it is a one sided argument here with me, no matter who you put up.

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2010, 10:34:41 AM »

Are you serious or are you just taking the pee?! Connors would have to be the best low, penetrating kick in our side by a big margin. There are very few players that can kick it as far and with such a low trajectory in the whole competition let alone team. The only players that come close is Newman, Lids and (surprizingly to me) Morton.

Stripes

Not taking the pee. Connors has a very elegant looking kicking style, but the results are anything but elegant. All style no substance. Take a look at the footage and the net result of his kicks, it's not pretty.
I think Connors turnovers are caused by him still not being fit enough, disposal will never be as good when the player is fatigued.
Hopefully he stays off the booze over the preseason and busts his ass on the training track

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2010, 10:36:10 AM »
look at the games we have won ths year - did Connors kick the bal well?


Are you serious or are you just taking the pee?! Connors would have to be the best low, penetrating kick in our side by a big margin. There are very few players that can kick it as far and with such a low trajectory in the whole competition let alone team. The only players that come close is Newman, Lids and (surprizingly to me) Morton.

Stripes

Not taking the pee. Connors has a very elegant looking kicking style, but the results are anything but elegant. All style no substance. Take a look at the footage and the net result of his kicks, it's not pretty.

1965

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #18 on: July 28, 2010, 10:39:10 AM »

Are you serious or are you just taking the pee?! Connors would have to be the best low, penetrating kick in our side by a big margin. There are very few players that can kick it as far and with such a low trajectory in the whole competition let alone team. The only players that come close is Newman, Lids and (surprizingly to me) Morton.

Stripes

Not taking the pee. Connors has a very elegant looking kicking style, but the results are anything but elegant. All style no substance. Take a look at the footage and the net result of his kicks, it's not pretty.
I think Connors turnovers are caused by him still not being fit enough, disposal will never be as good when the player is fatigued.
Hopefully he stays off the booze over the preseason and busts his ass on the training track

I didn't know Tambling had an issue with alcohol.

Sorry read this wrong you are talking about Conners.

 :bow
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 02:06:09 PM by 1965 »

FooffooValve

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #19 on: July 28, 2010, 11:56:00 AM »
What was Tambling's preseason like?
Non-existant

Yeah? If so, then there is no way we should be letting him go. A full preseason is just so important these days. The players do virtually nothing during the season — sure, some have modified programs to address individual issues, but if you don't get a full preseason, then you can expect to have an ordinary year.

Offline crannyvegas

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #20 on: July 28, 2010, 12:00:04 PM »
Connors is ordinary by foot.


Certainly was on Saturday - 50 something % effieciency on the weekend

Quote
Massively overrated by the fans IMO.

Not by this little black duck  :rollin


67% but you were close. It was 50 the week before but i think you will find that because he opts to kick so much that it brings his efficiency down...

WP you're an unabashed Tambling fan, what do you see his ultimate role for the side being? I would love to see him as our flashy outside player who plays up the offensive side of the ground. Perhaps with a full preseason he could up his speed??  
Detka! Detka! Detka!

FooffooValve

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #21 on: July 28, 2010, 12:29:58 PM »


Not taking the pee. Connors has a very elegant looking kicking style, but the results are anything but elegant. All style no substance. Take a look at the footage and the net result of his kicks, it's not pretty.

It isn't all about the kicking efficiency stats. Nathan Buckley used to have more clangers and a lower efficiency than you would expect, but that was because he was often kicking over 40m and thus statistically less likely to hit the mark.

With some players, you are willing to put up with some kicks that miss the mark because the ones that do hit are damaging. Believe me, the coaching staff, with a player like Connors, would be looking at Richmond goal/scoring movement involvements versus goals/scores against from direct turnovers from his foot and seeing if that comes up acceptably positive. If he is involved in 4 or 5 SOG a game, and gives up a couple the other way, then they will wear that. He would know exactly what stats he needs to achieve.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2010, 03:45:19 PM »
Put both in the back 6

hardwick likes good kicks behind the ball

Agreed. Tambling should be our small back.

Offline TheUmpire

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #23 on: August 16, 2010, 08:19:24 PM »
Do we still all think Connors can kick or have we moved across to the dark side.

All sizzle and no sausage!

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13308
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #24 on: August 16, 2010, 08:24:39 PM »
Over to the dark side

Offline tiger till i die

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #25 on: August 16, 2010, 08:42:57 PM »
Over to the dark side

then call me Darth

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13308
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #26 on: August 16, 2010, 08:57:02 PM »
Yes master

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #27 on: August 16, 2010, 11:09:51 PM »

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #28 on: August 16, 2010, 11:17:55 PM »
By the way, its Connor's inconsistent ball drop which is the problem there, the left hand grips and the ball tilts which mistimes the kick. Other than that he is very left sided.

Tambling is more of a spoon scoop action where he will miss 25 to 35 metre targets cos he drops the hips and uplifts to compensate.

Would hope that these 2 guys can make an impact in the next 2 years or otherwise they would be classified as list cloggers.  Tambling is maligned however IMHO is worth a further 2 seasons before a delist.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: Connors Vs Tambling
« Reply #29 on: August 17, 2010, 01:33:51 AM »
tambling all the way