40,184
THIS is our membership number. The club looks stupid when it claims 47,000 members and we come out with 40,000 official members. And this was on top of the supposed extraordinary success of the membership campaign. The club needs a reality check IMHO. If it wants to do membership numbers it should do it properly, not leave it till late July for the AFL to make us look stupid. Members are members and contributors are contributors and the club needs to make this distinction or better still just have the officially recognised memberships thats all and dont include other numbers.
Sorry Flagman but I will back the Club on this.
I don't give a rats what the AFL deems as a member.
Bottom line IMHO is the Club is right to declare every person no matter what type of membership (only pet m'ships should be excluded) they have purchased a 2011 MEMBER OF THE RFC.
I'll ask you this: I purchase Cub memberships for my nephew and niece every year, I don't bother with match day m'ships for them because they live in QLD. Their m'ships would not be included in the "official AFL" member numbers but they are still counted as RFC members by the RFC. I woulkd think they should be - dont' you agree?
I have no doubt you would find that all the MCC Tiger memberships sold would not be included inthe AFL tally but would be included in the Clubs as they should be
I am not disputing the difference seems extreme but as I said I see Essendon are in the same boat as us discrepency wise but it appears all club numbers don't match the AFL's list - would love to know why? Maybe as the AFL change the rules again
Maybe we need Mr RFC_O to get on here and explain