Changes for the St Kilda game next week?

[tony_montana]

pee moore off and play rance, astbury and the goo as our tall defenders. Moore was simply terrible today. Connors out cotchin in.

assberry was poo too

so what, play the kids and stuff off has beens or never will be's like moore, mcguane and co who've had their chances over years

[TigerLand]

pee moore off and play rance, astbury and the goo as our tall defenders. Moore was simply terrible today. Connors out cotchin in.

assberry was poo too

What a stuffing pea hearted post that is.

How clever of you.... That sort of sounds like "Astbury"..

Absolute pits of society... were you the flog that spat on Frawley?

[Ox]

don't take it personally you cum pot

It pleases me no end to see a neanderthal such as yourself,outraged by a post of mine. ,especially one of such little effort and no true ill-will.

Are you Mrs Assberry or do you just need a root ??

[Ramps]

pee moore off and play rance, astbury and the goo as our tall defenders. Moore was simply terrible today. Connors out cotchin in.

assberry was poo too

What a effing pea hearted post that is.

How clever of you.... That sort of sounds like "Astbury"..

Absolute pits of society... were you the flog that spat on Frawley?

take it easy pope its just a forum

[Ox]

pee moore off and play rance, astbury and the goo as our tall defenders. Moore was simply terrible today. Connors out cotchin in.

assberry was poo too

so what, play the kids and eff off has beens or never will be's like moore, mcguane and co who've had their chances over years

no,we need to play the kids obviously.

I'm drawing attention to the fact he was outclassed by carlton hacks,wasn't accountable and looked johnsonesque at times in the way he got out of hard ball contests.

Moore is frustrating as when he's bad,he's horrid.
McGuane is expendable.
Thursfield -well,i would have rather kept Schulz.

[Ox]

pee moore off and play rance, astbury and the goo as our tall defenders. Moore was simply terrible today. Connors out cotchin in.

assberry was poo too

What a effing pea hearted post that is.

How clever of you.... That sort of sounds like "Astbury"..

Absolute pits of society... were you the flog that spat on Frawley?

take it easy pope its just a forum

lmao ramps

Η νοείται πυρετού είναι πλήρης των όρχεων

[eliminator]

In Cotchin, Vickery, Rance, Taylor and Thursfield. Out Hicks, Cousins(inj), White(inj) Browne, Nason(rest)

[big tone]

Another one for me is Astbury.
Has done very little to show me he is our future. Does ok sometimes but on a whole just has not got that "something" you see in a young player that says, yes this kid MIGHT be ok.
I know he is a first year tall but sometimes you see that "something" in a kid very early on in there career.
Not me yet.....

[Ramps]

Another one for me is Astbury.
Has done very little to show me he is our future. Does ok sometimes but on a whole just has not got that "something" you see in a young player that says, yes this kid MIGHT be ok.
I know he is a first year tall but sometimes you see that "something" in a kid very early on in there career.
Not me yet.....

when he kicked 3 - wasnt that a decent showing?

[WilliamPowell]

I know who WP will want out  .

After today's "effort" you feel like replacing 18 players  

Well at least you've answered one of my questions regarding Cotch

Seroulsy I reckon there is probably only 6-8 who deserve a game next week the rest should be sent North Sunshine 

INS: Cotchin, Rance, Taylor, Polak (struth if we are gifting games to Post why not  ), Polo 

OUTS: Connors (continues to play selfish selfish footy  and the club continues to condone it and the media get seduced by the number of kicks he gets  ),
          Nason (he needs a rest),
          Graham (needs a rest looked disinterested)
          Hicks
          White (inj)

REALLY LUCKY BLOKES:

Post: gotta get that trade value up somehow so he stays
O'Reilly: struggled with the pace of the game but I like Jimmy
Moore: flaps his arms a lot telling people what to do pit he doesn't follow his own advice
Collins: first game back after injury so he's sort of excused
Jackson: the stats say 81% effieciency, thats because kicks to the wide open spaces of the MCG (read kicking to NO ONE) don't get picked up as being inefficient

   

[jackstar is back again]

Connors just has to be offered as trade in trade week.
has no endurance either

[1965]

Connors just has to be offered as trade in trade week.
has no endurance either

WP, Jack

I missed the game yesterday.

Why did the Age , The H-S and the Richmond site all put Conners into the best one or two for Richmond?

'65

[Penelope]

Because they have no idea '65, or perhaps that is an indictment on how bad they all played. I'm starting to see what WP has been saying about him...and the turnovers? Eff me. For all the poo that get's put on Tuck I have never seen him turn over the ball  from kicks when he is not actually being tackled , as often as I saw from Connors yesterday. His disposal was atrocious.

[WilliamPowell]

WP, Jack

I missed the game yesterday.

Why did the Age , The H-S and the Richmond site all put Conners into the best one or two for Richmond?

'65

IMHO '65 simply because he had 26 possessions (BTW of which 21 were uncontested).

[1965]

WP, Jack

I missed the game yesterday.

Why did the Age , The H-S and the Richmond site all put Conners into the best one or two for Richmond?

'65

IMHO '65 simply because he had 26 possessions (BTW of which 21 were uncontested).

Isn't the potential there?

Imagine how good he could become.

We were rewarded when we took a chance on Cuz.