Author Topic: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?  (Read 3475 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« on: September 15, 2010, 06:53:25 PM »
Next up is Kel.

Moore played 19 games in 2010 to take his career total to 84. He had 5 games with 20+ possies - R2 vs Dogs, R7 vs Adel, R14 vs Syd, R15 vs Freo and R19 vs Melb.

          Games    Disposals   Marks   Tackles   
2003#    -   
2004#    9            6.9         2.9       1.4       
2005      6            6.0         2.5       1.7
2006      2            7.0         4.5       3.0
2007      7            8.9         3.4       1.7
2008     22          15.7         6.2       1.8
2009     19          11.5         4.2       2.3
2010     19          14.1         5.6       1.9

http://www.finalsiren.com/PlayerStats.asp?PlayerID=1398&SeasonID=ALL
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/pp-richmond-tigers--kelvin-moore


How did we all rate Kel's season?

1965

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2010, 06:59:53 PM »

5/10

I like the guy but the jury is out on all our tall backs.

'65

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2010, 07:04:01 PM »
Gave him a 7 based on the games I saw (had the son tape all our wins while I was away too), tend to agree with 65 though, I really think if we cant target a decent backman in the draft we should try to get one in the trade period.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 07:14:00 PM »
at his best he's of AA quality, sadly we only see it a quarter of the time...still a very much required player, is as good offensively as he is defensively which is rare...at this point he is our best defender..Id love to say in 12 mths that grimesy and goo have gone past him but they both have the job ahead of them yet
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

1965

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2010, 07:48:50 PM »
Gave him a 7 based on the games I saw (had the son tape all our wins while I was away too), tend to agree with 65 though, I really think if we cant target a decent backman in the draft we should try to get one in the trade period.

WAT :cuddles '65

 :lol

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2010, 07:55:38 PM »
6 for me.
Showed glimpses of 2008 form one week, then would be well beaten the next.
I would see what teams would be prepared to offer for Kel.

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2010, 07:58:51 PM »
5. I find it hard to rate an of our guys much more than about a 6. There's lots of good signs in this 15th placed side.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2010, 08:03:46 PM »
Gave him a 7 based on the games I saw (had the son tape all our wins while I was away too), tend to agree with 65 though, I really think if we cant target a decent backman in the draft we should try to get one in the trade period.

WAT :cuddles '65

 :lol

 :lol :rollin :shh :thumbsup
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2010, 10:25:08 PM »
3.5

tried to develop into more of a rebounder type this season which he isnt a smart enough footballer to do well. Constantly got caught out in no mans land ie not close enough to his opponent and got exposed a lot.

Moore is at his best playing as a KPD even if he is a bit undersized for it. He was bulkier in 2008 and could keep his feet against the big guys, and was quicker than them when it hit the ground. He then trimmed down in 09 to play a more rebounding role and has never been the same since.

We can do without 1 or 2 of him, McGuane or Thursfiled, take your pick, i don't mind bc i think all 3 have had plenty of chances and are not up to scratch.

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40321
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2010, 10:26:07 PM »
A 5 from me

As summed up by Mr Magic

Showed glimpses of 2008 form one week, then would be well beaten the next.
I would see what teams would be prepared to offer for Kel.

Like so many of our players the difference between good & bad is still too great IMO
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2010, 10:30:37 PM »
4 - (from me  :)) I think he has gone a bit possession hungry!

Forgot about the basic "punch the football".

Why doesn't he play on the Monster Forwards? He is big? What is the problem?

 :-[

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2010, 06:45:09 AM »
Gave him a 5. Like some other posters, I think he had a very inconsistent year.  All 3 of our key taller backs suffered from it and none have put on the bulk required to match it with the opposition key tall forwards.  I think we need to look at moving 1 of the 3 amigos on (Thursfield is my choice but it wouldn't worry too much which one) and letting Gourdis and Post develop into the role.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2010, 11:44:29 AM »
5/10
His game against the Hawks was his best in yellow and black but like others have said we don't see it enough.
Solid but yet to take the next step up and stay there.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2010, 12:08:11 PM »
Trade for a kid

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 40. Kel Moore?
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2010, 12:56:14 PM »
A 7/10 from me. Thought he had a really good , consistent season. Easily our best tall defender.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos