one of the last pieces of the puzzle
go hardcore for a proven ruckman when the window starts to open.
agree with this
real smart clubs grow their own and stockpile. they then off load the ones they dont want often for very good picks. what have we to lose by taking another couple of ruckmen with a mid range to late nd pick and rookieing one.
sydneys two premiership ruckmen jolly and ball cost them picks 11 14 and 41. and they had them both for 5 yrs respectively. they then just last yr had to go out and pay picks 22 and 28 for mumford and seaby.
imo go hard for a good one with decent picks like we did with vickery but then turn over another 4 or 5 thru later picks and rookies in an attempt to find another one or two. we have done this to a small degree with graham and browne. the question with the 3 we have atm is will any of them make the grade.
even smarter clubs win premierships or is what sydney, collingwood and geelong did wrong and a waste of picks?
cmon claw, 22 for mumford is a bloody steal he's going to be the best ruckman in the league and would take him ahead of every other ruckman in the afl. Jolly helped the swans and pies to a flag. So too Ottens with geelong. They are not wasted picks
ah mumford was one i called for us to target. you may be right and for sure some clubs have benefitted greatly by trading into needs. but i reckon growing your own is the way to go.
the troublke is with ruckmen it is so hit and miss.
i have a mental blank with this kids name he went to wce at 29 or so geez i would have been happy to take him around there. sam jacobs anyone two yrs before adelaide got him i was adamant we should poach him.
seaby could only be an improvement on graham. moran was another who would be an upgrade and yeah he has struggled a little but i reckon he will get there.
will say the one im impressed with is simpson at geelong. the little ive seen the last yr or two i reckon he will be decent.