Author Topic: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?  (Read 4488 times)

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #15 on: November 03, 2010, 07:13:56 AM »
Capable of kicking goals. A real plus. Tired towards end of season. Good attitude. Hopefully continues to improve next year.

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #16 on: November 03, 2010, 10:01:36 AM »
Is a running machine with lovely footskills but I'm uncertai wether he will still be in our best side in the future. Of course I never thought King would be either so if he can continue to improve, strengthen and find a spot in the side I will be one of the first to congratulate him.

One thing Nason does do well is show that hard work will be rewarded and adds a significant amount of pressure on other players around him to train hard or they will lose their place to players who may not have the same potential upside as they do. This in itself is a huge plus for Nason being about and getting a game for mine  :cheers

Good luck Nase and keep fightig to improve!

Stripes

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2010, 10:48:04 AM »
Gave him a 7
Tired a bit at the end but geez you can't ask for much more from pick 70 odd.
Kicked some goals too which is good.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline nahadaman

  • Future Richmond star
  • **
  • Posts: 71
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #18 on: November 03, 2010, 02:23:08 PM »
Reminds me of an early Dale Morris, hopefully can become a similar player.

Offline sabartooth

  • Big Griff's Official Mentor !
  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #19 on: November 03, 2010, 03:09:32 PM »
Gave him a 5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 5. Probably wasn't quite as impressed with his season as some others appear to be i don't think getting 15 possies as a somewhat unaccountable wingman is that impressive if your opponent is getting 25. However, did kick some big goals for us provided some run often being the first released from a rebound from the 50 and for his first year it was a very solid perfomance. Don't think he is in our best 22 currently and don't see him becoming a regular in it but definately a good player to have on the list pushing others to perform and i hope his potential is higher than my expectations :thumbsup

3, needs to be a lot more involved
2 years into a 35 year plan

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #20 on: November 03, 2010, 03:28:24 PM »
Gave him a 5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 5. Probably wasn't quite as impressed with his season as some others appear to be i don't think getting 15 possies as a somewhat unaccountable wingman is that impressive if your opponent is getting 25. However, did kick some big goals for us provided some run often being the first released from a rebound from the 50 and for his first year it was a very solid perfomance. Don't think he is in our best 22 currently and don't see him becoming a regular in it but definately a good player to have on the list pushing others to perform and i hope his potential is higher than my expectations :thumbsup

3, needs to be a lot more involved
Nason's season rated a 3 lol
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #21 on: November 03, 2010, 03:54:39 PM »
Reminds me of an early Dale Morris, hopefully can become a similar player.

as in Dale Morris from the bulldogs?  ???

He will never be a dale morris type, morris is a 190cm super quick hard nosed tank backman. Predator will never have those physical traits

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2010, 06:06:00 PM »
Gave him a 5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 5. Probably wasn't quite as impressed with his season as some others appear to be i don't think getting 15 possies as a somewhat unaccountable wingman is that impressive if your opponent is getting 25. However, did kick some big goals for us provided some run often being the first released from a rebound from the 50 and for his first year it was a very solid perfomance. Don't think he is in our best 22 currently and don't see him becoming a regular in it but definately a good player to have on the list pushing others to perform and i hope his potential is higher than my expectations :thumbsup

3, needs to be a lot more involved
Pretty sure Nason was leading the B&F about 1/3 of the way into the season. Yet he still gets a 3 from you?
Laughable rating for a 1st year player

Offline sabartooth

  • Big Griff's Official Mentor !
  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2010, 11:44:20 AM »
OK upgrade to 3.5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 3. l would rate Dale Thomas 8-9 who plays a similar HFF position. Nason got a few kicks and showed some potential but some of you want to give everyone on our list 9-10 when we keep finishing down the bottom of the ladder. So that's why he gets a 3.5  ;D , needs to be a lot more involved and damaging to other teams.
2 years into a 35 year plan

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2010, 05:20:03 PM »
Gave him a five but real happy with his performance this.

Could be a real find if he further develops

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #25 on: November 06, 2010, 08:16:34 PM »
Gave him a 5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 5. Probably wasn't quite as impressed with his season as some others appear to be i don't think getting 15 possies as a somewhat unaccountable wingman is that impressive if your opponent is getting 25. However, did kick some big goals for us provided some run often being the first released from a rebound from the 50 and for his first year it was a very solid perfomance. Don't think he is in our best 22 currently and don't see him becoming a regular in it but definately a good player to have on the list pushing others to perform and i hope his potential is higher than my expectations :thumbsup

3, needs to be a lot more involved
Pretty sure Nason was leading the B&F about 1/3 of the way into the season. Yet he still gets a 3 from you?
Laughable rating for a 1st year player


leading the B & F after round 7/8. Okay now im convinced you are on the disco biscuits

nason 4
solid from where he came from not great

good selection but needs bulk
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #26 on: November 06, 2010, 08:43:22 PM »
The thing that is laughable is the fact that Nason actually was leading our B&F after about 5 rounds.  :-[

Gets a 6 from me... Played a couple of good games but was incredibly bad in the last 5-6 games (which is to be expected I guess). He's 22 next season so I'll personally be expecting improvement after a big pre season.

Offline julzqld

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3918
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #27 on: November 08, 2010, 04:59:20 PM »
Mini-me loves him

Offline Jacosh

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
  • No bish fish, the moon wasnt right.
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #28 on: November 08, 2010, 08:39:06 PM »
Well i gave him a 7

6 For how he came along from where he was picked.
I dont hold all players to the same ratings as say lids. They are all different and need to be scored accordingly.
Im sure that if this was a Geelong forum last year we wouldnt be holding ALL players to Ablett's standard.

Ohh almost forgot.  bonus point for the hair. :bow

Offline Infamy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4426
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Rate a Tiger's year - 47. Ben Nason?
« Reply #29 on: November 08, 2010, 11:18:51 PM »
Gave him a 5. The reason being that in terms of rating players for me everyone is held to the same standard so if lids, jack etc get 8's then Ben deserves a 5. Probably wasn't quite as impressed with his season as some others appear to be i don't think getting 15 possies as a somewhat unaccountable wingman is that impressive if your opponent is getting 25. However, did kick some big goals for us provided some run often being the first released from a rebound from the 50 and for his first year it was a very solid perfomance. Don't think he is in our best 22 currently and don't see him becoming a regular in it but definately a good player to have on the list pushing others to perform and i hope his potential is higher than my expectations :thumbsup

3, needs to be a lot more involved
Pretty sure Nason was leading the B&F about 1/3 of the way into the season. Yet he still gets a 3 from you?
Laughable rating for a 1st year player


leading the B & F after round 7/8. Okay now im convinced you are on the disco biscuits

nason 4
solid from where he came from not great

good selection but needs bulk
Was definitely up there, if not leading
Do you forget how crap we were and here was Nason busting is butt all game, so it wasn't exactly surprising to see him poll so highly