Author Topic: RFC Official - We're on board!  (Read 454826 times)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1350 on: October 20, 2015, 05:11:47 PM »
Even the old one?
Old one is working in the NBA.

Hence him being the old one ::). I meant when he was around/just leaving

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1351 on: October 20, 2015, 05:25:13 PM »
Well someone needs to do something. And I'm to hear the mods are trying  :gotigers
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1352 on: October 20, 2015, 05:33:23 PM »
Even the old one?
Old one is working in the NBA.

Hence him being the old one ::). I meant when he was around/just leaving

Again, sorry I don't understand what you are on about or are implying  :huh

Are you asking if the previous RFC_O did what Petey is asking about the current one ie "IS it true that RFCOs have been asking mods on forums to tone down the negativity before they answer questions"
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1353 on: October 20, 2015, 07:42:20 PM »
Yes.

Basically has any RFCO, present or former, put forward any complaints about negative posting?

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1354 on: October 20, 2015, 07:58:25 PM »
Yes.

Basically has any RFCO, present or former, put forward any complaints about negative posting?

No
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1355 on: October 20, 2015, 07:59:13 PM »
Yes.

Basically has any RFCO, present or former, put forward any complaints about negative posting?

No

K.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1356 on: October 22, 2015, 10:10:00 PM »
The absence is a disgrace. Shows club can't finish anything they start
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1357 on: October 23, 2015, 06:17:42 AM »
How hard is it to dedicate maybe half a day per week across 4-5 forums to answer questions or at least maintain a presence?

"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1358 on: October 23, 2015, 07:09:58 AM »
How hard is it to dedicate maybe half a day per week across 4-5 forums to answer questions or at least maintain a presence?
We are one of the few clubs that has even bothered to do this, so that is a positive.
I just don't think that it is a priority for the club. I can sort of understand why too. In the scheme of things, what percentage of the 70K members are on these forums? Probably less than 1%.....
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1359 on: October 23, 2015, 09:16:35 AM »
I thought WP was trying to find out what is going on.

Have they not even bothered to reply or is the reply something not wanted to be shared?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40306
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1360 on: October 23, 2015, 12:34:44 PM »
I thought WP was trying to find out what is going on.

Have they not even bothered to reply or is the reply something not wanted to be shared?

I haven't had time this week to sit down to write & send an email

Have had other things to deal with on here and away from here

Will get to it this weekend

Once I get an answer I will share

If I don't get a reply then I will keep emailing until I do
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8093
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1361 on: October 26, 2015, 07:48:59 PM »
How hard is it to dedicate maybe half a day per week across 4-5 forums to answer questions or at least maintain a presence?
We are one of the few clubs that has even bothered to do this, so that is a positive.
I just don't think that it is a priority for the club. I can sort of understand why too. In the scheme of things, what percentage of the 70K members are on these forums? Probably less than 1%.....

I reckon this makes it worse.
They start, then can't follow through.
Like recruiting players that can kick.
Good intentions can't put a roof over my head Marge.
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1362 on: October 26, 2015, 07:52:14 PM »
Just ban them.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7359
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1363 on: October 26, 2015, 08:04:19 PM »
= sum wank3r

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: RFC Official - We're on board!
« Reply #1364 on: October 30, 2015, 08:50:02 AM »
I thought WP was trying to find out what is going on.

Have they not even bothered to reply or is the reply something not wanted to be shared?

I haven't had time this week to sit down to write & send an email

Have had other things to deal with on here and away from here

Will get to it this weekend

Once I get an answer I will share

If I don't get a reply then I will keep emailing until I do

Bump
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI