« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]  (Read 4669 times)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2011, 04:17:01 PM »
The forbidden C word ;D
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2011, 04:21:14 PM »
LOL
Soz Willy-i didn't mean to add the xtra N.
LMAO@ A typo that works for the devil
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2011, 04:23:31 PM »
point being,Id rather they smash them properly and break a jaw.
What they do is girly stuff....and people all point the finger

FO!1!
Logged

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2011, 04:43:04 PM »
They both are free to play.

Vickery fined for instigating and being involved in a melee.

King had no case to answer.
Logged
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Tigermonk

  • Guest
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2011, 04:44:40 PM »
Good Post OX,   Too many shirt lifters in Tigerland. MRP will rape us again cause its Richmond
Logged

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5410
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2011, 04:45:32 PM »
Quote from: wayne on July 11, 2011, 04:43:04 PM
They both are free to play.

Vickery fined for instigating and being involved in a melee.

King had no case to answer.
I'll retract my ealier cooments about Kingy!I for one am very happy with that result!Thanks Wayne!
Logged

Offline Muscles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2011, 04:46:21 PM »
Quote from: wayne on July 11, 2011, 04:43:04 PM
They both are free to play.

Vickery fined for instigating and being involved in a melee.

King had no case to answer.

I thought the instigator was that Essendon fella, number 30, who was the third man in.  Not so?  Or a different set of rules each week?
Logged

Offline Oiafi

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Against logic there is no armour like ignorance.
Re: Will Vickery and King be in trouble with the MRP?
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2011, 05:17:31 PM »
Quote from: Muscles on July 11, 2011, 04:46:21 PM
Quote from: wayne on July 11, 2011, 04:43:04 PM
They both are free to play.

Vickery fined for instigating and being involved in a melee.

King had no case to answer.

I thought the instigator was that Essendon fella, number 30, who was the third man in.  Not so?  Or a different set of rules each week?

Me too. ???
Logged

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2011, 06:27:08 PM »
Vickery (x2), Edwards, Grigg and Martin copped fines...

---------------------------------------------------------------

Tyrone Vickery, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for being the instigator of a melee at quarter-time of the Round 16 match between Richmond and Essendon, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept an $1800 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for being the instigator of a melee is a $2400 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to an $1800 sanction.
 

Tyrone Vickey, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee at quarter-time of the Round 16 match between Richmond and Essendon, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.
 
Shaun Grigg, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee at quarter-time of the Round 16 match between Richmond and Essendon, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.

Shane Edwards, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee during the fourth quarter of the Round 16 match between Richmond and Essendon, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.
 
Dustin Martin, Richmond, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee during the fourth quarter of the Round 16 match between Essendon and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.

Other Incidents Assessed:
Contact between Richmond's Tyrone Vickery and Essendon's Patrick Ryder from the quarter-time break of Saturday's match was assessed. The impact was below the force required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
 
Contact between Richmond's Jake King and Essendon's Angus Monfries from the fourth quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The impact was below the force required to constitute a reportable offence, as a medical report from the Essendon Football Club said player Monfries was not treated for any injury for the contact. No further action was taken.
 


And the Bomber fines...

Jake Melksham, Essendon, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee at quarter-time of the Round 16 match between Essendon and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.
 
Patrick Ryder, Essendon, has been charged with a second offence for engaging in a melee at quarter-time of the Round 16 match between Essendon and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $2100 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $2800 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $2100 sanction.
 
Leroy Jetta, Essendon, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee during the fourth quarter of the Round 16 match between Essendon and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.
 
Ben Howlett, Essendon, has been charged with a first offence for engaging in a melee during the fourth quarter of the Round 16 match between Essendon and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday July 9, 2011.
 
In summary, he can accept a $1200 sanction with an early plea.
 
A first offence for engaging in a melee is a $1600 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $1200 sanction.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/118297/default.aspx
Logged

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3811
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2011, 06:37:15 PM »
Glad Vickery and King free to play Gold Coast. Would not have been great going up there without Vickery
Logged

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #25 on: July 11, 2011, 08:54:30 PM »
I think Angus Monfries should be fined $5,000 for pathetic acting
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #26 on: July 11, 2011, 09:07:13 PM »
Monfries should be hung up at punt rd and let the boys use him as a punching bag   :laugh:
Logged
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #27 on: July 11, 2011, 09:12:32 PM »
once again money well spent.

these fines are all collated and then distributed back to the clubs anyway.
Logged
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #28 on: July 11, 2011, 09:17:35 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on July 11, 2011, 08:54:30 PM
I think Angus Monfries should be fined $5,000 for pathetic acting

I hate him and his face. Wish Pickett was still around to knock him into next year
Logged

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Vickery, Edwards, Grigg and Martin cop fines [update]
« Reply #29 on: July 11, 2011, 10:24:20 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on July 11, 2011, 08:54:30 PM
I think Angus Monfries should be fined $5,000 for pathetic acting

They call him Hollywood.

I think that the common sense approach by the MRP with regard to wrestling/jumper punches with low impact is right, they should do the same with head butts.

Low impact means it brushed them so leave it.

Big improvement on previous rulings.
Logged
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »