From the Age webiste:
"Anderson said that the case was dealt with more severely than the Shaw case as the bets were placed by Wallis himself, and were more substantial.
However, his case involved no use of inside information for personal gain, which was taken into account when the penalty was determined.
The three bets, placed in June, July and August were footyquads, the second involving an Essendon leg.
Anderson said the league had taken into account that Wallis had eventually pled guilty to the offence; that there had been no evidence of corrupt activity; and there was no misuse of inside information.
However, the penalty, which precludes Wallis was any work with Essendon players, including during the 2012 NAB Cup, was sever for the following reasons: He was initially untruthful about the bets; he bet on his own club; the size of the bets was ‘not unsubstantial’; there was no excuse for making bets after the example set by the sanctions on Shaw and Maxwell.Full article:
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/wallis-banned-for-14-weeks-20110908-1jyxi.htmlAll you can really say is: