Author Topic: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread  (Read 27477 times)

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #225 on: February 18, 2013, 07:39:55 PM »
Actually Graham was the best. Killed it in fact

He was up against two very poor opponents but must admit he looked a hell of allot better than he ever did with us!!

Two very poor opponents? Poppycock. Trengove has been in a squad of 40 for AA and has won a B&F. Westhoff is very good around the ground and he (Gus) murdered Lobbe early on too. For him to hold his own around the ground against Trengove and Westhoff is a great effort in that heat. I expected him to have a heart attack at some point. He dominated the stoppages

Trengove averages 3.2 ho per game in 4 seasons and Westhoff 1.8 ho over 6 seasons.
Yep they both aren't ruckmen.

We tried to poach Trengove to be another tall defender for us a couple of years ago. At 197cm which is a fraction too short for a ruckman (he doesn't have a NicNat leap), CHB is his position.
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #226 on: February 18, 2013, 07:57:49 PM »
Actually Graham was the best. Killed it in fact

He was up against two very poor opponents but must admit he looked a hell of allot better than he ever did with us!!

Two very poor opponents? Poppycock. Trengove has been in a squad of 40 for AA and has won a B&F. Westhoff is very good around the ground and he (Gus) murdered Lobbe early on too. For him to hold his own around the ground against Trengove and Westhoff is a great effort in that heat. I expected him to have a heart attack at some point. He dominated the stoppages

Trengove averages 3.2 ho per game in 4 seasons and Westhoff 1.8 ho over 6 seasons.
Yep they both aren't ruckmen.

We tried to poach Trengove to be another tall defender for us a couple of years ago. At 197cm which is a fraction too short for a ruckman (he doesn't have a NicNat leap), CHB is his position.

A NicNat leap? Other than Howie, who the hell in Australia can jump like him? Troy Simmonds wouldn't be 197cm and he was a solid ruckman for a number of years. Jeff White was close to the best ruck in the comp and he was shorter than Richo. Trengove can ruck. There would be no debate here if it wasn't a former whipping boy of ours who kicked his arse yesterday.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #227 on: February 18, 2013, 08:12:33 PM »
Gus was always massively under rated

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #228 on: February 18, 2013, 08:13:52 PM »
Gus was always massively under rated

Yessssssssssssssssssss big man. :clapping

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #229 on: February 18, 2013, 08:18:03 PM »
..............for a Sheila

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #230 on: February 18, 2013, 08:33:07 PM »
Bump

Needed on now that the great Gus is proving his doubters wrong

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98234
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #231 on: February 18, 2013, 10:35:23 PM »
I've moved the Graham discussion from the NAB Cup thread to here.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #232 on: February 18, 2013, 11:18:20 PM »
Should have had its own topic as Trengove has nothing to do with Graham's appreciation thread ;D

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #233 on: February 19, 2013, 03:15:57 AM »
Actually Graham was the best. Killed it in fact

He was up against two very poor opponents but must admit he looked a hell of allot better than he ever did with us!!

Two very poor opponents? Poppycock. Trengove has been in a squad of 40 for AA and has won a B&F. Westhoff is very good around the ground and he (Gus) murdered Lobbe early on too. For him to hold his own around the ground against Trengove and Westhoff is a great effort in that heat. I expected him to have a heart attack at some point. He dominated the stoppages

Trengove averages 3.2 ho per game in 4 seasons and Westhoff 1.8 ho over 6 seasons.
Yep they both aren't ruckmen.

We tried to poach Trengove to be another tall defender for us a couple of years ago. At 197cm which is a fraction too short for a ruckman (he doesn't have a NicNat leap), CHB is his position.

A NicNat leap? Other than Howie, who the hell in Australia can jump like him? Troy Simmonds wouldn't be 197cm and he was a solid ruckman for a number of years. Jeff White was close to the best ruck in the comp and he was shorter than Richo. Trengove can ruck. There would be no debate here if it wasn't a former whipping boy of ours who kicked his arse yesterday.
What heights ruckmen were in the past doesn't relate to footy now (Roy Wright was only Jacko's height - 188cm - when he won two Brownlows). Footy has changed so much even over just the past 5 years. 197cm is too short for a full-time ruck now unless you have some incredibly freakish leap. Most full-time rucks these days are 200cm or above and the new rules will only further favour the taller ruckmen. So while I don't rate Gus as a AFL footballer, there is no doubt he is definitely ruckman size at 201cm tall whereas Trengove is not. At best Trengove could do follower roles and throw-ins. No way he is or will be a genuine centrebounce ruckman.
 
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #234 on: February 19, 2013, 09:26:11 AM »
He's a CHB. He was drafted as a ruck that could play KP at either end. Turns out he was a poo ruck and forward but an excellent CHB. Having said that, if he was forced to play and entire game in the centre against Graham, he'd be on top by the end of the day. Too aggressive and competitive to let the turtle triumph.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #235 on: February 19, 2013, 02:47:13 PM »
Actually Graham was the best. Killed it in fact

He was up against two very poor opponents but must admit he looked a hell of allot better than he ever did with us!!

Two very poor opponents? Poppycock. Trengove has been in a squad of 40 for AA and has won a B&F. Westhoff is very good around the ground and he (Gus) murdered Lobbe early on too. For him to hold his own around the ground against Trengove and Westhoff is a great effort in that heat. I expected him to have a heart attack at some point. He dominated the stoppages

Trengove averages 3.2 ho per game in 4 seasons and Westhoff 1.8 ho over 6 seasons.
Yep they both aren't ruckmen.

We tried to poach Trengove to be another tall defender for us a couple of years ago. At 197cm which is a fraction too short for a ruckman (he doesn't have a NicNat leap), CHB is his position.

A NicNat leap? Other than Howie, who the hell in Australia can jump like him? Troy Simmonds wouldn't be 197cm and he was a solid ruckman for a number of years. Jeff White was close to the best ruck in the comp and he was shorter than Richo. Trengove can ruck. There would be no debate here if it wasn't a former whipping boy of ours who kicked his arse yesterday.
What heights ruckmen were in the past doesn't relate to footy now (Roy Wright was only Jacko's height - 188cm - when he won two Brownlows). Footy has changed so much even over just the past 5 years. 197cm is too short for a full-time ruck now unless you have some incredibly freakish leap. Most full-time rucks these days are 200cm or above and the new rules will only further favour the taller ruckmen. So while I don't rate Gus as a AFL footballer, there is no doubt he is definitely ruckman size at 201cm tall whereas Trengove is not. At best Trengove could do follower roles and throw-ins. No way he is or will be a genuine centrebounce ruckman.
 

You're talking about a guy who finished up 50+ years ago. How tall is Stefan Martin? Trengove has played good football in the ruck. You're saying blokes under 200cm can't play in the ruck due to centre bounces. Really. How many centre bounces are there per game? If I were a betting man I would say Jackson has a better leap than most who are taller. At worst he loses the hitout count (but due to his aggressiveness he will make a great contest + win a fair share of his own) but easily beats any beanpole around the ground.  If you only judge ruckman on how many hitouts they win at a centre bounce then you'll miss blokes who are very good around the ground.

Offline Mopsy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Once a Tiger always a Tiger
Re: Angus Graham Appreciation Thread
« Reply #236 on: February 22, 2013, 02:14:35 PM »
Actually Graham was the best. Killed it in fact

He was up against two very poor opponents but must admit he looked a hell of allot better than he ever did with us!!

Two very poor opponents? Poppycock. Trengove has been in a squad of 40 for AA and has won a B&F. Westhoff is very good around the ground and he (Gus) murdered Lobbe early on too. For him to hold his own around the ground against Trengove and Westhoff is a great effort in that heat. I expected him to have a heart attack at some point. He dominated the stoppages

Trengove averages 3.2 ho per game in 4 seasons and Westhoff 1.8 ho over 6 seasons.
Yep they both aren't ruckmen.

We tried to poach Trengove to be another tall defender for us a couple of years ago. At 197cm which is a fraction too short for a ruckman (he doesn't have a NicNat leap), CHB is his position.

A NicNat leap? Other than Howie, who the hell in Australia can jump like him? Troy Simmonds wouldn't be 197cm and he was a solid ruckman for a number of years. Jeff White was close to the best ruck in the comp and he was shorter than Richo. Trengove can ruck. There would be no debate here if it wasn't a former whipping boy of ours who kicked his arse yesterday.
What heights ruckmen were in the past doesn't relate to footy now (Roy Wright was only Jacko's height - 188cm - when he won two Brownlows). Footy has changed so much even over just the past 5 years. 197cm is too short for a full-time ruck now unless you have some incredibly freakish leap. Most full-time rucks these days are 200cm or above and the new rules will only further favour the taller ruckmen. So while I don't rate Gus as a AFL footballer, there is no doubt he is definitely ruckman size at 201cm tall whereas Trengove is not. At best Trengove could do follower roles and throw-ins. No way he is or will be a genuine centrebounce ruckman.
 
Mighty on average our race has grown much taller since those times and of course we lost a lot of our six footers in the two world wars


Edit: fixed quoting
« Last Edit: February 23, 2013, 03:24:10 PM by one-eyed »