I have been thinking about this since poor Dave Rodan did his knee in downtown Morwell and I thought I'd raise it here to see what people think and if anyone can give me some clarity.
Dave Rodan's knee injury was described as being a
"ruptured ACL joint". When Gas did his knee it was said he had ruptured his ACL as well.
Over the years other players have
torn their ACL or snapped their ACL.
The result is always the same a complete knee reconstruction.
However, over the years I have read that some knee injuries requiring reconstructions are considered not "bad ones" while others are described as really bad ones. For example, when Gas did his knee they said it wasn't a bad one but when Joel Smith was at StKilda and did his knee (I still remember that one after all these years - OUCH) it was described as a bad ACL. The result of these "bad ones" and not so "bad ones" are that the reconstructions are referred to the same way.
I am assuming that rupturing the ACL is not as bad a tearing or snapping it and as a result the reconstruction process (the grafting) for each is slightly different?
Does anyone know , has anyone had a reco?
Thoughts? Comments?