Author Topic: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?  (Read 11116 times)

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #60 on: November 25, 2011, 11:10:28 PM »
agree with the big West Aussie
i've seen some fat ass midgets
you've got the right ticket but jumped on the wrong train
 :lol

don't try and get between me and the big fella, we go way back to back  :-*

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #61 on: November 25, 2011, 11:16:07 PM »
  :rollin
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #62 on: November 25, 2011, 11:28:57 PM »
sometimes you have to wade through the by-catch to get your target  :laugh:

midget is based on height not weight  :thumbsup

No its not...
surely you come from a different reality?

what definition of a midget, besides yours, is based on weight, not height?

your not suggesting that westoff was a midget are you?

No i'm not

does it matter

am I
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2011, 11:33:42 PM »
you've got the right ticket but jumped on the wrong train
 :lol

 :lol only just pieced it together
don't think i even made the train, i'm on the doomed trawler  :lol

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2011, 11:34:28 PM »
sometimes you have to wade through the by-catch to get your target  :laugh:

midget is based on height not weight  :thumbsup

No its not...
surely you come from a different reality?

what definition of a midget, besides yours, is based on weight, not height?

your not suggesting that westoff was a midget are you?

No i'm not  :yep

does it matter :nope

am I  :huh

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2011, 11:35:33 PM »
you've got the right ticket but jumped on the wrong train
 :lol

 :lol only just pieced it together
don't think i even made the train, i'm on the doomed trawler  :lol
:lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2011, 11:46:16 PM »
sometimes you have to wade through the by-catch to get your target  :laugh:

midget is based on height not weight  :thumbsup

No its not...
surely you come from a different reality?

what definition of a midget, besides yours, is based on weight, not height?

your not suggesting that westoff was a midget are you?

No i'm not  :yep

does it matter :nope

am I  :huh


No i'm not   ::)

does it matter  :whistle

am I   :lol

DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #67 on: November 26, 2011, 05:01:23 AM »
Snip! Okay back to the footy topic ppl!

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #68 on: November 26, 2011, 10:51:52 AM »
Snip! Okay back to the footy topic ppl!

ever thought about becoming a barber  ;D

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #69 on: November 26, 2011, 11:18:36 AM »
I think we choose as good a player as we could with our picks, but I don't think we we able to pick up exactly the type of players we ideally would have, had they been available.

But I also remember Richard Tambling bursting through the centre in his first NAB Cup game, having two bounces and kicking a 60 metre torpedo goal. I now refrain from judging drafts prematurely.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 98251
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #70 on: November 26, 2011, 03:42:28 PM »
Inside Football's Brett Anderson twitter:

"Richmond draft review: Hardwick wanted strong bodies + good skills, Ellis & Arnot are that! Elton was a top 10 talent at start of year."

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #71 on: November 28, 2011, 06:40:07 AM »
I gave it a 6/10 overall as it's hard to judge with just 3 picks. While it's a positive that there's a clear switch to drafting solid bodied players who don't need to wait 3 preseasons to put on weight, I would've thought we needed another classy 6' 2" (187cm) midfielder to upgrade from a Tuck or Jacko and to add more midfield depth. Then theres Elton who seems to be vying for the same position/role as Griffiths. It seems we decided that the 2011 draft was more about adding depth and size than fixing any remaining positional deficiencies. There was no big key defender or classy medium forward on offer that we were interested in..
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #72 on: November 28, 2011, 06:58:09 AM »
Elton will be a few years in the making ala Vickery and JR8 but I think he has as much if not more of an upside starting off as either of those fellas did if you do a comparison.  This bloke could of gone very early if he hadm't of muffed up the nationals and got bitten by the spider etc.  Might be a blessing for us though.  Griffs is still going to come on and kick some stool regulation valve  for us no problems there.  Goddam filter...
Lots of people name their swords......

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #73 on: November 28, 2011, 09:26:54 AM »
I gave it a 6/10 overall as it's hard to judge with just 3 picks. While it's a positive that there's a clear switch to drafting solid bodied players who don't need to wait 3 preseasons to put on weight, I would've thought we needed another classy 6' 2" (187cm) midfielder to upgrade from a Tuck or Jacko and to add more midfield depth. Then theres Elton who seems to be vying for the same position/role as Griffiths. It seems we decided that the 2011 draft was more about adding depth and size than fixing any remaining positional deficiencies. There was no big key defender or classy medium forward on offer that we were interested in..

The club would probably agree with you MT but in this year's draft any classy midfielders that we rated were most likely gone by the time we got our first pick so they have done the best they could given the circumstances.  I gave them a 7 because I could see their strategy/thinking, I agreed with it, and I think they did a reasonable job of achieving it.  Of course, feel free to wheel in the hindsight trolley now!  ;D

Offline Owl

  • Magnificent Bastard
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7012
  • Bring me TWO chickens
Re: How did we rate how Richmond went in the draft?
« Reply #74 on: November 28, 2011, 09:27:46 AM »
give yourself an uppercut.  But if you look at their respective stats, on paper, Elton looks more promising, he isn't a soccer convert like Riewoldt was, he is more athletic than both Vickery and Jack but can play and can kick the guts out of it....don't make me come over there you stuffin.....  We still on for the weekend?
« Last Edit: November 28, 2011, 02:01:58 PM by one-eyed »
Lots of people name their swords......