Richmond director John Matthies' firm in loan row (Age)

[cub]

Who gives a rats where the money comes from!

[bojangles17]

Hey Blaisee.what sort of a twit are you?? Judging people by what $$$ they spend .now that's as shallow as it gets..what about all the volantees who gave there heart and soul to the place..your just a twit

cut it out Jack, not sure his response deserves a crucifiction, teeth in and brain into gear next time partner and be nice it's christmas 

[Jackstar is back again]

Sorry ....is a tiny bit strong.imbecile is much more suitable

[MikeetIGER]

Sorry twit is a tiny bit strong.imbecile is much more suitable

You're definately an expert on the word imbecile....

GO TIGES!!!

[WilliamPowell]

Snip - topic people without the name calling and personal insults.   

Disagree debate the topic with out the crap

ordinary bloke, actually a disgrace

Matthies poo bloke it seems

Do you know him personally? IF you don't then how would you know if he is an "ordinary bloke"

While I agree the article doesn't do him any favours but unless you know him personally I don't think you can label him an "ordinary bloke" just like I can say he is agreat bloke because I don't know him

Agree Al.  Very complex situation for an "illiterate" person to have found themselves in, in the first place I would have thought.

Have to agree smokey

[bojangles17]

I find it remarkable that due to the plaintiff being an illiterate, everyone jumps to the simple conclusion , what a nasty conniving shylock JM must be...well Ive come across some illiterates in my time, they were also, uncouth, fould mouthed swines that I wouldnt trust as far as I could kick them, so my advice would be to stop short of sending a possee to lynch the bloke and find out a little more about the situation...hope that helps

[Penelope]

dont be drama queen bo and read what people have actually said.

[bojangles17]

dont be drama queen bo and read what people have actually said.

how about you review posts 2-10 and let us know how you arrived at the conclusion he was an ordinary bloke et al....wait I'll just get some popcorn and buckle myself in, cant wait to hear this

[Penelope]

where did i say he was an ordinary bloke? did i say that? .

In fact how about you go back and read my first post in the thread, or any of my posts actually, and tell me how you came to the conclusion i was bagging Matthies in any way at all?

did anyone who made mention of the woman involved actually make a judgment on Matthies

as i said, dont be a drama queen and read what people are actually writing.

hope you are enjoying you popcorn and long wait, and not missing anything important.

[yellowandback]

I find it remarkable that due to the plaintiff being an illiterate, everyone jumps to the simple conclusion , what a nasty conniving shylock JM must be...well Ive come across some illiterates in my time, they were also, uncouth, fould mouthed swines that I wouldnt trust as far as I could kick them, so my advice would be to stop short of sending a possee to lynch the bloke and find out a little more about the situation...hope that helps

I find it remarkable that you would stereotype someone as being a "foul mouthed and uncouth" because they cannot read?

I know a few hard working people who were illiterate because they were immigrants to this country and worked their  R's off doing jobs you wouldnt do to make their way in this country. Learning to read might not be a priority when you need to support a family partner.

I know of others who were undiagnosed with dyslexia and therefore had to put up with ignorant nobs like you because they didn't know what they didn't know.

The most sensible thing you have posted is the need to hear more before jumping to conclusions partner.

On the one hand, you're prepared to hang and quarter someone who is basically defending her rights not to be exploited and yet you then say we need to find out more about the situation.

[bojangles17]

I find it remarkable that due to the plaintiff being an illiterate, everyone jumps to the simple conclusion , what a nasty conniving shylock JM must be...well Ive come across some illiterates in my time, they were also, uncouth, fould mouthed swines that I wouldnt trust as far as I could kick them, so my advice would be to stop short of sending a possee to lynch the bloke and find out a little more about the situation...hope that helps

I find it remarkable that you would stereotype someone as being a "foul mouthed and uncouth" because they cannot read?

I know a few hard working people who were illiterate because they were immigrants to this country and worked their  R's off doing jobs you wouldnt do to make their way in this country. Learning to read might not be a priority when you need to support a family partner.

I know of others who were undiagnosed with dyslexia and therefore had to put up with ignorant nobs like you because they didn't know what they didn't know.

The most sensible thing you have posted is the need to hear more before jumping to conclusions partner.

On the one hand, you're prepared to hang and quarter someone who is basically defending her rights not to be exploited and yet you then say we need to find out more about the situation.

I was actually arguing against the stereotype ya dill, not every illiterate is poor and intellectually disabled , i balanced the case with my expereince, hope that helps

[RedanTiger]

ordinary bloke, actually a disgrace

Matthies poo bloke it seems

Do you know him personally? IF you don't then how would you know if he is an "ordinary bloke"

While I agree the article doesn't do him any favours but unless you know him personally I don't think you can label him an "ordinary bloke" just like I can say he is agreat bloke because I don't know him

I would have to follow the lead of a Supreme Court Judge who has heard all the evidence in this case, including from Matthies himself, in agreeing that Matthies is an "ordinary bloke and a disgrace". That's why the Supreme Court Justice has referred the matter to the corporate watchdog.

So here's one for balance - Jackstar is relying on a Supreme Court Justice for his opinion. On what evidence is Blaisee basing his statement of fact that Matthies has "given millions to the club". 

[bojangles17]

ordinary bloke, actually a disgrace

Matthies poo bloke it seems

Do you know him personally? IF you don't then how would you know if he is an "ordinary bloke"

While I agree the article doesn't do him any favours but unless you know him personally I don't think you can label him an "ordinary bloke" just like I can say he is agreat bloke because I don't know him

I would have to follow the lead of a Supreme Court Judge who has heard all the evidence in this case, including from Matthies himself, in agreeing that Matthies is an "ordinary bloke and a disgrace". That's why the Supreme Court Justice has referred the matter to the corporate watchdog.

So here's one for balance - Jackstar is relying on a Supreme Court Justice for his opinion. On what evidence is Blaisee basing his statement of fact that Matthies has "given millions to the club".

has their been a decision yet or are you jumping the gun

[Dubstep Dookie]

I find it remarkable that people are making comments on circumstances they know nothing about 

[Smokey]

I find it remarkable that people are making comments on circumstances they know nothing about 

Wouldn't be OER if we did it any other way Dooks!