Author Topic: Melbourne surely cant beat us  (Read 5545 times)

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #30 on: April 01, 2012, 11:04:05 AM »
the problem with melbourne is they had a coach who set out to lose games.

you reap what you sow

Unlike Carlton hey Al, or Collingwood who picked up Thomas and Pendles the year they tanked.
The problem Al, not the symptom
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #31 on: April 01, 2012, 11:09:30 AM »
Not everyone who finishes last did it on purpose.

How long did it take carlton to recover from their alleged tanking?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #32 on: April 01, 2012, 11:49:41 AM »
Didn't notice that they have the Eagles at subi next week.

They will get murdered over there, and then they will come back and fire up to win against us. Then their 10 thousand supporters will do our heads in at the match when Watts kicks 5 on Post.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline rogerd3

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #33 on: April 01, 2012, 12:11:42 PM »
Didn't notice that they have the Eagles at subi next week.

They will get murdered over there, and then they will come back and fire up to win against us. Then their 10 thousand supporters will do our heads in at the match when Watts kicks 5 on Post.

just about right there.

Offline Muscles

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #34 on: April 01, 2012, 12:23:28 PM »
Just watched the replay of the Cats vs Shockers.  Funny how a couple of the Cat's mids can be in the back pocket to clear the ball and then in the forward pocket 30 secs later, time and time again, in the last quarter.  Bartel and Chappy lead the way. Pity that our mids can't learn from watching that effort.

I thought that was the critical difference between the Blooze and us.  Their mids, who aren't renown for it, were prepared to run both ways a lot harder than our guys were.

Offline Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8099
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #35 on: April 01, 2012, 01:47:47 PM »
Not everyone who finishes last did it on purpose.

How long did it take carlton to recover from their alleged tanking?

Carlton played finals in 2001 and 2012 will be their 4th consecutive year in finals. Compared to the Tigers tanking has been a huge success!
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #36 on: April 01, 2012, 02:15:39 PM »
Remember we said the same thing in round 4, 2009 and we lost  :help. SEN today were sure putting us in the same boat as the Dees today  ::).
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #37 on: April 01, 2012, 02:21:43 PM »
Remember we said the same thing in round 4, 2009 and we lost  :help. SEN today were sure putting us in the same boat as the Dees today  ::).

Let me tell you MT, we don't beat the toffs in Round 3 and its a long way back from 0-5 to 12th spot let alone 6-10 position.

Anyone ever made finals having lost their first 5 in the same season?

Offline mightytiges

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 58597
  • Eat 'Em Alive!
    • oneeyed-richmond.com
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #38 on: April 01, 2012, 02:33:11 PM »
Remember we said the same thing in round 4, 2009 and we lost  :help. SEN today were sure putting us in the same boat as the Dees today  ::).

Let me tell you MT, we don't beat the toffs in Round 3 and its a long way back from 0-5 to 12th spot let alone 6-10 position.

Anyone ever made finals having lost their first 5 in the same season?
Nup.

I never saw us and still don't see us making the finals. While our top end has improved, we are still too young and inexperienced and our depth across our list still isn't there. You would remember I told Craig Cameron that last year ;).
All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be - Pink Floyd

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #39 on: April 01, 2012, 03:28:38 PM »
Not everyone who finishes last did it on purpose.

How long did it take carlton to recover from their alleged tanking?

Carlton played finals in 2001 and 2012 will be their 4th consecutive year in finals. Compared to the Tigers tanking has been a huge success!
what year did they set out to deliberately lose matches?

compared to the tigers everyone has been a huge success
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #40 on: April 01, 2012, 03:30:17 PM »
we could pee talk whether melb loss was worse than ours, facts where we lost to a side widely tipped to be Top 3 or 4 this year, whereas Melbourne....Put that asie, we cant afford to take anyone lightly, we need our A grade game ea week...and that should take care of 14 or so sides in the comp :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #41 on: April 01, 2012, 03:53:18 PM »
Not everyone who finishes last did it on purpose.

How long did it take carlton to recover from their alleged tanking?

Carlton played finals in 2001 and 2012 will be their 4th consecutive year in finals. Compared to the Tigers tanking has been a huge success!
what year did they set out to deliberately lose matches?

compared to the tigers everyone has been a huge success


So are you suggesting that Carlton never tanked?
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #42 on: April 01, 2012, 04:18:24 PM »
no what i'm suggesting (originally) is that by deliberately creating a losing culture Melbourne now have a lot of work to undo that culture.

But in the above post you quoted, i am asking what year did Calrton set out to deliberately lose games..

Not to sure if i can make the question any simpler :huh
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2012, 04:33:11 PM »
no what i'm suggesting (originally) is that by deliberately creating a losing culture Melbourne now have a lot of work to undo that culture.

But in the above post you quoted, i am asking what year did Calrton set out to deliberately lose games..

Not to sure if i can make the question any simpler :huh

The question is ambiguous because you appear to be differentiating deliberate losing with tanking
If so, what is the difference, if not are you suggesting Carlton never tanked. :-\
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Melbourne surely cant beat us
« Reply #44 on: April 01, 2012, 04:44:17 PM »
no if i had said tanking then the question is ambiguous.

Tanking by definition is to deliberately lose. It stems from boxing terminology to take a dive or more precisely to dive into the tank. A Tank being a term in the USA for a pool way back then. you could use use the term match fixing, but generally that is used when money is involved and tanking is used when draft picks are involved, again coming from the USA, but basically both refer to deliberately losing. The term tanking has also been used in politics in the USA , but still refers to candidates setting out to lose.

Many people who follow AFL refer to tanking as things like putting injured players in for surgery, trying players in different positions giving youngsters a game or two and playing bordeline players just so you have a last look at them before cutting, as tanking, but that is not what i am talking about

so the term tanking is ambiguous, as different people see it as having different reasons.

I deliberately have not used the term tanking in this particular discussion, for that reason.

I have only referred to deliberately losing games.

So the simple, unambiguous question remains, what year did Carlton deliberately lose games?

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI