Author Topic: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)  (Read 8800 times)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2012, 07:43:40 AM »
nason yes he is.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2012, 01:41:03 PM by one-eyed »

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2012, 08:25:08 AM »

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2012, 09:05:10 AM »
Sluactch is putrid. Worse player in the AFL.

I'd rather Brad Miller.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2012, 10:00:47 AM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2012, 10:12:53 AM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.

He had the currency of a wet fart

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2012, 01:02:43 PM »
Port offered a 2nd rounder 2 years earlier and Greg Miller knocked it back  :banghead

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #36 on: April 20, 2012, 02:10:05 PM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.

He had the currency of a wet fart

POTY
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #37 on: April 20, 2012, 02:40:07 PM »
Port offered a 2nd rounder 2 years earlier and Greg Miller knocked it back  :banghead

Geez we like knocking back those draft picks for duds.... Ben Holland...

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #38 on: April 20, 2012, 06:21:44 PM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.

He had the currency of a wet fart

yeah and that's partly our fault. should have played him in the 2nd half of 09. even if he didn't touch the ball he still would have had more currency then a bloke playing SANFL twos. Maybe the trade was already agreed to during the season

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #39 on: April 20, 2012, 07:32:41 PM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.



He had the currency of a wet fart

yeah and that's partly our fault. should have played him in the 2nd half of 09. even if he didn't touch the ball he still would have had more currency then a bloke playing SANFL twos. Maybe the trade was already agreed to during the season

would rather have watched myself pee out a gallstone

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #40 on: April 20, 2012, 07:34:23 PM »
The article wasn't comparing Schulz to anyone. It's about players clubs would like to have back. and if we had a choice then I reckon we'd take Schulz back in a heartbeat. The lad can play. If he had an AFL standard midfield delivering it to him...:outtahere

Agree. It's a moot point though as Jay didn't really want to stay at Richmond either.
The crux of my frustration is what we got in return for him. Port pulled our pants down on the trade.



He had the currency of a wet fart

yeah and that's partly our fault. should have played him in the 2nd half of 09. even if he didn't touch the ball he still would have had more currency then a bloke playing SANFL twos. Maybe the trade was already agreed to during the season

would rather have watched myself pee out a gallstone

...and it's Chucky with the 3 pointer  :clapping

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #41 on: April 20, 2012, 07:55:06 PM »
Old Ted and his black noodle  :cheers

Jay Schulz knows it

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #42 on: April 20, 2012, 08:06:25 PM »
Ted Richards is my second favourite player

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100473
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #43 on: April 21, 2012, 08:36:52 AM »
Port Adelaide forward Jay Schulz goes from cagey tiger to lethal weapon

Eliza Sewell
From:Herald Sun
April 21, 2012



JAY Schulz used to be Richmond's problem. Today, he will be Collingwood's.

Schulz will step on to Etihad Stadium as Port Adelaide's premier forward, a status he failed to achieve in seven frustrating seasons with the Tigers.

A challenging apprenticeship at Tigerland included stints forward and back, and, of course, Schulz lived in the shadow of Matthew Richardson.
 
Tigers fans couldn't swallow the No.12 draft pick's inconsistency and many couldn't wait to see the back of him when he was traded to the Power at the end of 2009. But Schulz said he was his harshest critic.
 
"They're very passionate people (Tigers fans), but I never felt it personally," he said.
 
"I was very sick of, towards the end of my days at Richmond, people asking me why I wasn't playing consistent football. I was very sick of people telling me that I was very talented and under-performing.

"Those were some of the things that were starting to take a toll on me mentally. (It) makes you think, 'Well s---, am I really that talented? I obviously mustn't be because I'm not able to do it'."
 
Schulz kicked 58 goals in 71 games in yellow and black, spending all but four games of his final year in the VFL.
 
In contrast, his first year at Port yielded 33 goals in 16 games and he backed that up with 31 goals from another 16 games last year and another eight in 2012.
 
Former Richmond coach Terry Wallace said Schulz was up against it from the start.
 
"I think he suffered a little bit from playing alongside Matthew Richardson for a long period," Wallace said.
 
"That wasn't Matthew's fault, but it's what would happen with Jonathan Brown, Nick Riewoldt, any of those real stars of the game - the ball gets directed in their direction 80 per cent of the time so you've only got 20 per cent to try to pick up the scraps.
 
"He kicked that six goals up in Brisbane early (2004), and that almost became the standard and everyone thought that's what you've got to deliver. I think he found that difficult to live up to."
 
Schulz said "growing up a bit" had contributed to his success at Port, along with being allowed to play permanently forward.

But he's also won the mental battle, with some help from an Adelaide sports psychologist.
 
"I'm more comfortable with my own abilities and believe in myself more to a certain extent," he said. "In my final year at Richmond, I started to realise - I don't want this to sound arrogant - but I shouldn't have been playing VFL, and I was starting to believe I was an AFL player.
 
"I was talking with people a lot more about my mental state of mind, trying not to ride my highs too high and my lows too low and just trying to be a much more level person, because it reflected the way I was playing.
 
"I still am my harshest critic."
 
In the end, the split with Richmond was amicable. Coach Damien Hardwick called him in and told him there were offers on the table and Schulz thought it was time to go.
 
Wallace said Schulz lacked confidence at Richmond, but he always thought he'd prosper.
 
"I wouldn't have let him go if I had have been there, I would have wanted to keep him," Wallace said."There were a lot of people at Richmond and I'm talking players as well, who thought he could play."
 
Schulz was caught drink-driving in 2005, an incident that cost the Tigers their TAC sponsorship, and Wallace said that contributed to Schulz's lack of success at Punt Rd, too.
 
"I think that put him into his shell a little bit," he said. "It was a combination of everything getting in his way."
 
Schulz said the episode was one of the toughest weeks of his life.
 
"It was always a harder thing for me because I wasn't playing consistent footy ... I couldn't repay the faith," he said. "It definitely took a toll, to what extent I couldn't tell you, but it was tough. I'm a better person now."
 
Schulz, now 27, and partner Amy are parents to Halo, who was born in August.
 
"No matter how I play on the weekend I always come home to a big smile," he said.
 
Wallace said he was pleased for his former project player.
 
"You want the best for those guys, you love to see them go on ... to see him thriving, it's a good story," he said.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/more-news/port-adelaide-forward-jay-schulz-goes-from-cagey-tiger-to-lethal-weapon/story-e6frf9jf-1226334814410

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #44 on: April 21, 2012, 08:58:46 AM »
Why the articles about Poort players on the Richmond board? This should be moved to the Outer. Poor moderating.