Author Topic: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)  (Read 8840 times)

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #60 on: May 19, 2012, 05:39:55 PM »
He stinks and so the port

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #61 on: September 02, 2012, 09:39:25 PM »
I hope people are finally ready to admit they were wrong about this guy. 12 marks and 4.1 today on Rancey.

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #62 on: September 02, 2012, 09:47:37 PM »
I hope people are finally ready to admit they were wrong about this guy. 12 marks and 4.1 today on Rancey.

No he stinks and so do Port

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #63 on: September 02, 2012, 09:52:19 PM »
I hope people are finally ready to admit they were wrong about this guy. 12 marks and 4.1 today on Rancey.

No he stinks and so do Port

Yeah but you would have to admit he is better than Riewoldt?

Online Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: The men clubs would love to have back - Jay Schulz (I.F.)
« Reply #64 on: September 02, 2012, 09:53:29 PM »
I hope people are finally ready to admit they were wrong about this guy. 12 marks and 4.1 today on Rancey.

No he stinks and so do Port

Yeah but you would have to admit he is better than Riewoldt?

True i would take a fourth rounder for Riewoldt