Author Topic: Would you take Tambling, Pettifier, Morton or another of our old players back?  (Read 6102 times)

Offline Stripes

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4264
We have to let players go but sometimes it would be nice to get them back if we could take them for nothing. Do we have any players worth a second chance?  :o

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Jason Torney

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Chris Naish
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

the claw

  • Guest
i went other and picked schulz.
we could do with a real solid consistent team oriented kpf atm
even in saying this i know we did the right thing in cutting him. we had something like 7 yrs of mostly mediocre and inconsistent performances and something had to give.
we sto this day hang onto players for far to long who have been mostly mediocre inconsistent and with big flaws in their games.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
I'd have Shultz but he was a cancer in our club and thats why we got rid of him.

Lost us our TAC sponsorship.
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline The Big Richo

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3140
  • Keyboard Hero
Yeah Shultcz was a disgrace.
Who isn't a fan of the thinking man's orange Tim Fleming?

Gerks 27/6/11

But you see, it's not me, it's not my family.
In your head, in your head they are fighting,
With their tanks and their bombs,
And their bombs and their guns.
In your head, in your head, they are crying...

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Will Thursfield

Offline rufio_1991

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
  • #23
mitch farmer

had a great kick and could kick goals, surprised why we didn't trial him in the forward line

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
I'd have Shultz but he was a cancer in our club and thats why we got rid of him.

Lost us our TAC sponsorship.

Cancer and thats why we got rid of him? He left by HIS choice. Had a few clubs interested in him in 2009 so he left. Could have stayed if he wanted because he was contracted. Zantuck, Schulz and others all had a role in losing that sponsorship. Schulz was just the final nail. Made us a poo load money anyway.

anyway, Schulz and an in form Rodan are two blokes I'd have back

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Um, where the stuff is the Relton Roberts voting option I was promised?  >:(
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 11:10:44 PM by Dookie »

gerkin greg

  • Guest

Online Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5105
  • All up inside ya.
I've been following the Burang Bullet on da tweets bruz.

from 4th of May:
'2 minute noodles and cans before footy tomorra bruz. #carbs'

http://twitter.com/#!/scooby_50

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
I've been following the Burang Bullet on da tweets bruz.

from 4th of May:
'2 minute noodles and cans before footy tomorra bruz. #carbs'

http://twitter.com/#!/scooby_50

OMG!! That is pure class those tweets I'm following!
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Sabretooth

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Schulz is a notable omission from the options listed in the poll.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2012, 02:31:17 PM by Sabretooth »

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Schulz without doubt.