Author Topic: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]  (Read 19324 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #135 on: July 07, 2012, 04:39:56 PM »
Tuck is the dead set heart of this club! IMO all round the best player we have! Mentally tough, strong, versatile, he has what our other players lack!

Cotchin then daylight. Tuck best player all round , you can't be serious. Love Tucky, but come on

Cotch great, but all round Tuck, plays back, mid, forward......

22 points up and we are poo..

Hands down the Dees will overtake us next year!

I'll buy you a Dees membership :thumbsup

I will PM you my address..
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #136 on: July 07, 2012, 04:40:19 PM »
:lol

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #138 on: July 07, 2012, 04:43:17 PM »
Tuck.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #139 on: July 07, 2012, 04:51:46 PM »
pee weak win....
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #140 on: July 07, 2012, 04:52:57 PM »
did better than your favorite team against did against them
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Lozza

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #141 on: July 07, 2012, 04:58:42 PM »
Would rather have root canal therapy than sit through a game like that again, instant delete off the IQ, certainly no moments for the highlight reel during that poor effort. Funny thing is that McGuane had a good game but with him in the team it just seemed like the old Tigers today. Loopy handballs to players under pressure, dinky 5 metre kicks to players under pressure, running with the ball with no apparent awareness of being mown down. All the traits of the Tigers over the last few season which i thought we had seen the end of. Even our kicking efficiency which had been good to date was so far from acceptable today. We really have missed two key opportunities to increase our %, if we dont use the GC game to do that then for me we dont deserve finals even if we manage to sneak in. Its games like this and the GWS game that if we end up in 9th spot due to an inferior % we will look back and say what if.

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #142 on: July 07, 2012, 05:05:30 PM »
A really poor performance against a team who is nowhere near being competitive. I rate the performance a 3/10 at best. Most other sides would have beaten us today. We have a really long way to go still but at least the 4 points are in the bag. A really disappointing day IMHO should have won by 20 goals if we were a serious club.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #143 on: July 07, 2012, 05:40:01 PM »
Would rather have root canal therapy than sit through a game like that again, instant delete off the IQ, certainly no moments for the highlight reel during that poor effort. Funny thing is that McGuane had a good game but with him in the team it just seemed like the old Tigers today. Loopy handballs to players under pressure, dinky 5 metre kicks to players under pressure, running with the ball with no apparent awareness of being mown down. All the traits of the Tigers over the last few season which i thought we had seen the end of. Even our kicking efficiency which had been good to date was so far from acceptable today. We really have missed two key opportunities to increase our %, if we dont use the GC game to do that then for me we dont deserve finals even if we manage to sneak in. Its games like this and the GWS game that if we end up in 9th spot due to an inferior % we will look back and say what if.

x 2

And I'm not going to blame McGuane either, I thought he was our best forward over 4 quarters but the resemblance of our style today to the 'Tige's of old' was a real worry.  I have never seen so much poor use (over use) of the ball from us all year - bloody handballs back into trouble was almost like we were running a training drill of forcing ourselves into a pressure situation!

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8464
  • In Absentia
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #144 on: July 07, 2012, 06:02:55 PM »
When are we going to smash a poor side?

We seem to raise or drop our level depending on who we play.

We look a million bucks against West Coast, Hawks and St. Kilda and against Poort, GWS and Melbourne look like we're fighting it out for the spoon with them.
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #145 on: July 07, 2012, 06:06:32 PM »
Would rather have root canal therapy than sit through a game like that again, instant delete off the IQ, certainly no moments for the highlight reel during that poor effort. Funny thing is that McGuane had a good game but with him in the team it just seemed like the old Tigers today. Loopy handballs to players under pressure, dinky 5 metre kicks to players under pressure, running with the ball with no apparent awareness of being mown down. All the traits of the Tigers over the last few season which i thought we had seen the end of. Even our kicking efficiency which had been good to date was so far from acceptable today. We really have missed two key opportunities to increase our %, if we dont use the GC game to do that then for me we dont deserve finals even if we manage to sneak in. Its games like this and the GWS game that if we end up in 9th spot due to an inferior % we will look back and say what if.

x 2

And I'm not going to blame McGuane either, I thought he was our best forward over 4 quarters but the resemblance of our style today to the 'Tige's of old' was a real worry.  I have never seen so much poor use (over use) of the ball from us all year - bloody handballs back into trouble was almost like we were running a training drill of forcing ourselves into a pressure situation!
x 3

Froze my t@s off for that rubbish. What has happened to the side that I saw defeat the Saints? Over-posession, lack of leadership (apart from Cotch), imbecilic movement into the forward line.

I said to my son that Nahas is just a paddock footballer (after the first quarter) and he retorted  that I'm right but he will kick 3 and be selected next week - and he was right. Addam Maric is also not up to it. The youngsters I will cut some slack.

Why is it that every Coach salivates when opposition teams try to go 'one-on-one' yet Dimma and his players are frozen with fear?

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #146 on: July 07, 2012, 06:14:12 PM »

Froze my t@s off for that rubbish. What has happened to the side that I saw defeat the Saints? Over-posession, lack of leadership (apart from Cotch), imbecilic movement into the forward line.


And with Yarra Park closed I decided to travel in by train.

Never again.

I'll walk next time.

Good to have a win.

A win next week and then two eight point games against North and Carlton.
Can't see us winning either of those.

 :cheers
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #147 on: July 07, 2012, 06:19:32 PM »
I liked Big Tom's efforts today. He gave Eevarn a rest and filled a role when Griff was injured.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #148 on: July 07, 2012, 06:29:22 PM »
Too many stupid players, list cloggers, vfl superstars etc whatever you wanna call 'em.

Until we get rid of these types we will never be good enough.

Bugger off dude. We've just made 7 changes and we're killing this mob
C'mon coach, Most of those 7 wouldn't play in any other team!
You can find every excuse under the sun and we might even win but we are seriously miles away. Wed be killed by most other teams today.
any chance you could display some football knowledge and actually tell us what areas we are falling down in rather making simple generalisations.

the only thing that is stopping us from being 10 goals up is poor goal kicking.
turnovers, clangers and poor decision making.
Like I said if we were playing a top 8 side we'd be getting smashed.
only because once again we are not taking our chances. we have dominated for most of the game and have not been overly bad in the areas you mention. very few clangers (except kicks on goal) and decision making has generally been good, particlarly under pressure.

on the flip side our pressure has been great and melbourne are getting very few easy kicks, and no easy goals
so you agree with coach then? Do you think some of these guys are actually good enough?

It's plain to see in my opinion. Some of these blokes are try hards but miles away from being good enough for this level.

.... Like I said plain to see.... if your at the game.
anyone knows that there are players that need to iomprove or be replaced, but the carry on like we are getting flogged reeks of barrackers who dont understand the game. the only thing that is preventing a large easy win is poor goal kicking 11.22.

we are flattering melbourne with our poor kicking for goal, as we have done in the last 4 weeks
no your absolutely wrong Al.
If we played a top 8 side today we wouldve been thrashed. Fact.
We don't have enough quality players yet and we were very very very lucky we were playing Melbourne today.
The club that keeps giving.

Offline Tigeritis™©®

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9657
  • Richmond, Premiers 2017.2019.2020
Re: Richmond vs Melbourne [members' replacement game]
« Reply #149 on: July 07, 2012, 06:33:50 PM »
It's funny how many of posters who actually went to the game think we were very poor. But coach and Al think we were great.
 :lol  :shh
The club that keeps giving.