That's just basic knowledge.
Really?
So I would assume you know the anatomy of the brachial plexus too?
I actually have anatomy knowledge but let's not deviate from the point because unlike you, I don't feel the need to act superior. He simply said there are some injuries that don't cause more problems which is pretty common knowledge, you don't need to know the anatomy behind the nerves or the glenohumeral joint.
and that's about as vague a statement as one could make to try and prove their point.
See that's where YBB's problem was though, he read too much into pretty much a nothing statement.
If you can't see what I was doing I'll have to explain. Claw was having a go at the Judge's knowledge of injuries by making a comment on injuries himself. He was specifically talking about Morris' injury. It wasn't a nothing statement. How the hell does claw know what the extent of Morris' injury is? Claw has no medical training (or appears that way anyway) but he is happy to have a go at a fellow forum member using "facts" to back up a pretty rude statement.
My point is that NOBODY on here could possibly know exactly what his shoulder injury is and that as such cannot assume that he isn't doing any damage every time he pops out his shoulder.
Then you come on to add fuel to the fire by saying that it's basic knowledge. Well, how do you come to that conclusion? Do you also know the exact state of Morris' shoulder injury? I highly doubt it.
I'm not here to cast any superiority over any one else, be assured of that. However, I do take offence to posters that write things they have no right to post and in the mean time are being rude to someone else whilst they are posting these comments.
I do feel I have a right to challenge posters on comments they have made, especially on medical grounds, if I do seriously disagree with their views.