Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 330459 times)

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3705 on: April 27, 2017, 02:03:44 AM »
Fwiw, I still want the useless prick gone.
LMAO at losing Caracella to Colonwood and going back to aimless footy.
Caracella and Balmey.

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8095
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3706 on: April 27, 2017, 07:29:57 AM »
I still can't see Dimma coaching us to a flag but am prepared to hold out some hope...
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3707 on: April 27, 2017, 10:44:27 AM »
I wasnt comfortable with this thread being on page 3 so lets revisit it.

FWIW i still want him sacked if we dont move forward, but facts are it wont happen until seasons end , if at all.

any comments?

he should be judged at seasons now and whilst these wins are nice, he should be judged come seasons end and especially after our september campaign if we make it.

dont progress forward then sack the bum and install blake as our coach.

Blake won't be there at seasons end.

He will be coaching Collingwood.

The only way that we will retain him is if the board puts in a succession plan and gets Dimma to agree.

Offer Dimma a promotion.

Do we have a Director of Coaching?
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Online Hard Roar Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8095
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3708 on: April 27, 2017, 11:48:13 AM »
Why would we promote him?
8 years, $4-5 million in salary for a return of 3 possibly 4 finals campaigns. I'm not sure that even resembles a promotion.
He'd make a decent senior assistant at a club like the Bulldogs.
Neil Balme is proving we need people who have achieved elite results at other clubs in our senior positions
“I find it nearly impossible to make those judgments, but he is certainly up there with the really important ones, he is certainly up there with the Francis Bourkes and the Royce Harts and the Kevin Bartlett and the Kevin Sheedys, there is no doubt about that,” Balme said.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3709 on: April 27, 2017, 12:26:39 PM »
You all understand that this tool has been kept on simply out of the need for Piggy and Ben to justify their unprofessional decisions and club management.
Get Blake, use his nouse (fkstick clearly has nfi) and keep the token tool on, to soften the reality of how many years they wasted, both in terms of recruitment and establishing a winning culture under a winning coach.

In one way it's an admission that they're stuffn imbeciles...but sneaky dog ones.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline sugark

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3710 on: April 27, 2017, 12:54:22 PM »
How much dribble can one person include in a post!!!

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3711 on: April 27, 2017, 01:15:05 PM »
As astute posters have stated previously a succession plan is hopefully in place or will be. The inner sanctum and players know where this improvement has come from and it wasn't from a 'cock n bull', 'road to damascus' moment where Dimma's supposed "let them play" theory was borne. Ryan ferguson said when commenting on Shia Bolton, and I quote: " we don't care about the number of possessions, we care about their impact on the game"....Hallelujah! These aren't the words of "possessions at all cost" Dimma.....no way.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3712 on: April 27, 2017, 02:01:25 PM »
Losing Caracella to Collingwood will be like when we lost Sheedy to Essendon....except without the excuse that the incumbent had just coached us to a premiership...
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3713 on: April 27, 2017, 05:26:49 PM »
You all understand that this tool has been kept on simply out of the need for Piggy and Ben to justify their unprofessional decisions and club management.
Get Blake, use his nouse (fkstick clearly has nfi) and keep the token tool on, to soften the reality of how many years they wasted, both in terms of recruitment and establishing a winning culture under a winning coach.

In one way it's an admission that they're stuffn imbeciles...but sneaky dog ones.

I dont disagree with this.

Astute and reasonable comment
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3714 on: May 15, 2017, 12:56:04 PM »

Bump

I'm on board.

We need a new Captain and Coach.

How about making Rance Captain-Coach?

 :cheers
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3715 on: May 15, 2017, 01:02:07 PM »

Bump

I'm on board.

We need a new Captain and Coach.

How about making Rance Captain-Coach?

 :cheers
:snidegrin

For how long now?
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Simonator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2888
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3716 on: May 15, 2017, 04:19:06 PM »
Should've been sacked end of last year with everyone else. Given a second chance this year, so far I'd say 5-3 isn't a bad result. What's the pass mark ?

Offline mat073

  • Perth's biggest tiger tragic.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4802
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3717 on: May 15, 2017, 04:24:53 PM »
I would of taken 5-3 at the start of the year but **** me we could be 7-1 .
Unleash the tornado

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3718 on: May 15, 2017, 04:53:56 PM »
Should've been sacked end of last year with everyone else. Given a second chance this year, so far I'd say 5-3 isn't a bad result. What's the pass mark ?

Whatever it is, he won't get there
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Sack Hardwick [merged]
« Reply #3719 on: May 15, 2017, 05:40:12 PM »
Should've been sacked end of last year with everyone else. Given a second chance this year, so far I'd say 5-3 isn't a bad result. What's the pass mark ?

Whatever it is, he won't get there

And he'll probably get a contract extension irrespective
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018