Author Topic: Sack Hardwick [merged]  (Read 330828 times)

Offline 🏅Dooks

  • FOOTBALL EXPERT
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10370
  • 🏆✴✔👍⛉🌟
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #630 on: March 17, 2014, 07:39:37 PM »
LMAO OX  :cheers

Who am I kidding.

I'm addicted to this rubbish up the arse.

Amusingly I believed I no longer gave an Edgar Brit.

Back up the dozer big man.

Everyone gives a Brad Pitt
"Sliding doors moment.
If Damian Barrett had a brain
Then its made of sh#t" Dont Argue - 2/8/2018

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #631 on: March 18, 2014, 12:46:25 PM »
Dimma's ok but Ken Hinkley is a gun. Port have based their game on gut running and ultra discliplined defense.  That's the way to achieve success in the AFL. We don't do that.
Did we get it right choosing Dimma ahead of Hinkley ?  I guess we weren't to know that defending wouldn't be a high priority under Dimma's gameplan ?
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #632 on: March 18, 2014, 01:22:27 PM »
I think Poort are a fairly crap defensive side

Their run keeps them in games

We schooled them easily last year on their home deck

"It's fraught with danger to look at one game and make assessment as to where we need to improve,"

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #633 on: March 18, 2014, 02:43:07 PM »
I think Poort are a fairly crap defensive side

Their run keeps them in games

We schooled them easily last year on their home deck

"It's fraught with danger to look at one game and make assessment as to where we need to improve,"

True Gerk. I know it's only round 1 but we do leak goals in bursts. Happened all last year. Teams don't kick one or two before we respond. They kick  5, 6 or 7.
 I'm ok with Dimma for now but I love what Hinkley's been able to do. Port were an absolute basket case when he got there. They were getting beaten by 150+ points in some games under Primus. Was he that bad or is Hinkley that good ? They'll be a good side again this year. Top 8 certs I reckon. Maybe top 4 ?
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #634 on: March 18, 2014, 03:29:11 PM »
Primus was pretty bad and the club had become toxic, but Hinkley is good and he has inherited a talented crop and stable back room.

They should make the 8 again. They got swag.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #635 on: March 18, 2014, 03:33:14 PM »
Primus was worse than bad. Not his fault he was chosen as coach though. Port are in a bit of strife if Westhoff or Schulz go down. They'd still be a decent side but they need those two kicking about.

I reckon we should get Studley involved at Richmond. Give him a job.

Offline froars

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #636 on: March 27, 2014, 10:12:33 PM »
FHO, sick of this idiot just sitting back letting th is happen every bloody year

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #637 on: March 27, 2014, 10:22:25 PM »
FHO, sick of this idiot just sitting back letting th is happen every bloody year

Great call

Offline froars

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #638 on: March 27, 2014, 10:23:41 PM »
If they'd have kicked straight different result.
While he sits back staring into space

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13304
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #639 on: March 27, 2014, 10:24:53 PM »
If they'd have kicked straight different result.
While he sits back staring into space

Keep moaning while the rest of us celebrate a win, very impressive

Offline lamington

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #640 on: March 27, 2014, 10:25:10 PM »
Definitely let off the hook. They missed almost everything in front of goal. Definitely got outcoached in the 2nd half. Not to mention this is a Carlton squad with no Judd, Kruezer, and Walker. Would've went down in a horrible fashion had they been at full strength with the way we played tonight

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #641 on: March 27, 2014, 10:28:40 PM »
Mick watches the game unfold, sees where they're losing it, plugs the holes and they work us over. We just stay in the same gear and hope to win. Dimma setup is and prepared better but got smashed in the coaches box on game day again.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #642 on: March 27, 2014, 11:14:05 PM »
Hard wick doesn't often win the tactical battle

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #643 on: March 28, 2014, 12:09:59 AM »
I don't think Dimma is to blame here .Not sure if Chocco is in the box with Dimma but if he is then Dimma has a shoulder to lean on who is very good in this area .so maybe the issue falls back on the players and what happens between their ears

tony_montana

  • Guest
Re: Sack Hardwick
« Reply #644 on: March 28, 2014, 12:14:13 AM »
Nah Choco isn't in the box, he's on the pine revving up the boys and sticking to his development coach role. Personally feel we are under utilising his talents, but he seems happy so who am I to judge?