Author Topic: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads  (Read 16470 times)

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #60 on: July 30, 2012, 09:32:01 PM »
Mr Magic.i will post a copy of the ladder after the final round

the claw

  • Guest
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #61 on: July 30, 2012, 10:51:28 PM »
I ain't talking about Geelong
I am talking about a club that had under performed for the past 30 years
Why compare with Geelong
You should be employed at Punt Road
most of us are wondering just what you are talking about jack. one thing for sure what ever it is there isnt much common sense involved.

the only possible conclusion one can come to is your a very persistent fisherman.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #62 on: July 30, 2012, 10:57:38 PM »
Mr Magic.i will post a copy of the ladder after the final round

Great Jack. If anything it will prove we have improved.

Percentage sitting at 106% currently..last year 86%.

Currently sitting on 7 wins and I'd expect at least couple more from the remaining rounds...last year we had 8 wins.

However even though it will look healthier, it's pretty obvious to anyone paying genuine attention that we've improved the list since last year without looking too hard.

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #63 on: July 31, 2012, 07:03:24 AM »
Improved the list ..you must be joking
This year has proved that out top 6 players are probably the best in the comp and the rest of the list is ordinary
Our best players have carried the team
This year has shown that many players aren't up to it
It's amazing how many people think that Grigg is a good player
Biggest squib going around
If we had improved .we would of beaten Gold Coast
End of story
You can argue to the calls come home
I have never seen one player carry a football club as Cotchin has this year

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14182
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #64 on: July 31, 2012, 07:46:42 AM »
Improved yet still got beaten by a bunch of kids and nearly by GWS

When we play finals il admit we have improved

Off field we have improved with memberships, FTF etc etc, but that's it.

Until finals are achieved getting embarrassed once again does not mark improvement IMO

WGAF about % if you don't win
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #65 on: July 31, 2012, 08:02:18 AM »
Daniel what's amazing that people think because our percentage is over 100 we have improved
Maybe they should learn to read and have a look at the blow outs on the percentages of other teams  :banghead

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #66 on: July 31, 2012, 08:23:02 AM »
maybe you should get a better grasp of the English language and learn what the word improved means.
There are different levels of improvement, but that seems too complicated
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Online Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5472
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #67 on: July 31, 2012, 08:57:26 AM »
Hardwick won't be and should not be sacked. Cop out reaction.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14182
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #68 on: July 31, 2012, 09:15:34 AM »
maybe you should get a better grasp of the English language and learn what the word improved means.
There are different levels of improvement, but that seems too complicated

People view improvement differently also Al

I see beating GC and finally beating teams we haven't in years as improvement

As I said off field we have improved no doubting that but on field I just don't see it

We are still fragile as ever before and still can't finish teams off as others do

Our list hasn't improved and spuds still getting rewarded games

Certain players have improved e.g the usuals and Grimes. Saw good signs with Griff too

I would rather lose with Elton and Brett O than with Miller,  Jackson and co

Jack R still still thinking he is King and Houli and co worried about what's for dinner at Dimmas than putting head over ball does not mark improvement IMO


Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #69 on: July 31, 2012, 09:22:44 AM »
Can't beat Gold Coast..still can't win winnable games
Couldn't beat Carltons B Team
Give me a break Al
You should look up the meaning of the word WIN

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #70 on: July 31, 2012, 09:44:19 AM »
according to your theory, if the only games we lost all year were to gold coast and north, then we still would not have improved. :lol

as i said the simple concept of levels of improvement is beyond your comprehension. because we have not improved to an acceptable standard, you think that means we have not improved at all.

and lets ignore that when when we played carltons b team, we also had our b team. yeah, nah thats doesnt matter.

contradiction after contradiction.

margins dont matter when we lose, but do when we win.

the opposition have a few outs, so we should win, regardless of how many of we have.

a side plays their "b" side and they should lose
we have 11 changes in two weeks but that doesnt matter, we should win.

normally i have trouble tolerating fools, but you provide so much entertainment. It's such a boring place when you throw a tantie and close your accounts.

I do feel sorry for anyone that has to put up with such a miserable bitter and twisted person for any length of time though.
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #71 on: July 31, 2012, 09:45:33 AM »
If we had improved .we would of beaten Gold Coast
End of story

You are such a fool. Had a look at the ladder Jack?
Who's sitting one and two?
That's right Hawthorn and Sydney. Two teams we have beaten this season. :P
You can't on one hand point to GC and then ignore that fact just so you can grandstand like some pompous oracle.
If you don't want to support this club then pee off. They don't need behindhole people like you anywhere near it. >:(

Offline JVT

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1834
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #72 on: July 31, 2012, 03:23:25 PM »
We beat the Aints for the first time in 10 years, pummeled Hawthorn.

The 'improvement' for mine is that we haven't been belted by over 10 goals this season, which shows genuine competitiveness and yes, while the fade outs are there at the worst of times, I no longer go to a game and expect us to get belted by 10 goals + as I have in the past.

The problem we have at the moment is our depth and our bottom 6-7 players. When we lost players like Foley and Grimes and to an extent TV who wasn't right all year, we have nothing but crap to call up from Coburg and we are left exposed.

Players like McGuane, Moore, White, Webberley, Graham and A. Maric should never get an AFL game, but we have been forced to play them through lack of depth and injury.

Fix this issue and we will be playing finals, need to move on some more of the crap and bring in some quality depth players that will cost us peanuts. Thats what St Kilda and Sydney have been doing for years, and why they can be competitive while they continue to draft their next generation of 'cream' from year to year. I'm looking forward to this draft and trade period, not for the young talent, but for the depth we need to bring in.

Offline Smokey

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9279
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #73 on: July 31, 2012, 05:51:13 PM »

maybe you should get a better grasp of the English language


You can argue to the calls come home

I think you're on to something Al.   :huh

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: LMAO @ Sack Hardwick threads
« Reply #74 on: July 31, 2012, 05:52:37 PM »
 :lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI