« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.  (Read 4174 times)

Ox

  • Guest
The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« on: August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM »
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

Time to build a new culture.

Time has come to establish a new benchmark.

Let Chimp b Chimp,with Chimps number.

He's the best we have had in decades.
Logged

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2012, 10:03:44 PM »
Chimp told me he wants to wear the 69

Yin Yang mother****er
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2012, 10:05:32 PM »
what a shame
Logged

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4842
  • Beaver BLT
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2012, 10:18:00 PM »
Quote from: gerks on August 13, 2012, 10:03:44 PM
Chimp told me he wants to wear the 69

Yin Yang mother****er

I heard in a meeting that Relton Roberts wanted to wear 88, the concept was rejected and consequently he let himself go :shh
Logged

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2012, 10:34:38 PM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

I'll raise you Maurice Rioli.
Logged

Offline Darth Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1125
  • Dimmasty RFC!
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2012, 01:19:11 AM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

Yes it has been immaculate.
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2012, 02:13:49 AM »
Quote from: Mr Magic on August 13, 2012, 10:34:38 PM
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

I'll raise you Maurice Rioli.

still 30 years

No point in honoring a stuffing number.

Old school mentality.

Logged

Offline Go Richo 12

  • Richmond tragic, bleeding heart, hopeless cricketer and terrible fisherman.
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5355
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2012, 06:38:22 AM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 14, 2012, 02:13:49 AM
Quote from: Mr Magic on August 13, 2012, 10:34:38 PM
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

I'll raise you Maurice Rioli.

still 30 years

No point in honoring a stuffing number.

Old school mentality.
It was during the times of old school that we were last successful.
Logged

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2012, 07:42:15 AM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 14, 2012, 02:13:49 AM
Quote from: Mr Magic on August 13, 2012, 10:34:38 PM
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

I'll raise you Maurice Rioli.

still 30 years

No point in honoring a stuffing number.

Old school mentality.

I'm with you on that one. Prefer Cotchin wears number 9. The number's irrelevant, it's the acts that are important.
Logged

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13709
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2012, 07:45:45 AM »
Spot on

Ditch the number

Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point


Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2012, 07:52:53 AM »
Quote from: []())([]™ on August 13, 2012, 10:02:40 PM
Apart from Jack Dyers era,it stands for mediocrity since its conception.

Time to build a new culture.

Time has come to establish a new benchmark.

Let Chimp b Chimp,with Chimps number.

He's the best we have had in decades.

It is about building a new culture that pays homage to what made this club, this is rubbish oxx, what next, get rid of the sash....the 17 stays :shh
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39361
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2012, 08:04:19 AM »
Quote from: daniel161 on August 14, 2012, 07:45:45 AM
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7330
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2012, 08:13:35 AM »
Cotch captain, keeps 9 :thumbsup
Logged

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13709
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2012, 08:16:39 AM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on August 14, 2012, 08:04:19 AM
Quote from: daniel161 on August 14, 2012, 07:45:45 AM
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

Ooh im sorry i didn't realize Broders was captain? Kane Johnson though gee wiz how inspirational was he with his 20 metre set shot behinds. Please give me a spell

I'm in favour of players wearing 17 but why does it have to be the captain. Its complete BS.

whether your 17 or 70 u should wear the jumper with pride. Enter Steve Morris and Tuck. Those are players i really enjoy watching. Not gifted with talent but give it their all and within the rules not like spud Jackson

Cotch stays at 9. Old school leather face mentality don't need it





Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2012, 08:16:54 AM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on August 14, 2012, 08:04:19 AM
Quote from: daniel161 on August 14, 2012, 07:45:45 AM
Just haven't seen anyone wear with pride since Rioli, so what's the point

So Paul Broderick didn't wear it with pride? Didn't deserve to wear it?

How many years ago did Brodders wear it? Perhaps daniel never saw him.. ;) ;D

BTW Maurice wasn't captain either.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6   Go Up
« previous next »