Author Topic: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.  (Read 4101 times)

10 FLAGS

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #60 on: September 09, 2012, 09:35:49 AM »
I think Cotch should stick with the No 9. The club however would need to do something else that keeps the no.17 in our supporters memory for that the club could simply name a coterie group "Club 17" or something else like that.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #61 on: September 09, 2012, 09:40:26 AM »
maybe cotch will stick to 9 and maybe he wont be our next captain   :shh

ling was captain b4 selwood, so dont discount deledio yet  ;)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #62 on: September 09, 2012, 09:54:50 AM »
Stop pushing that man. Deledio is not a 30 year old tagger with a couple of years left.

Offline eliminator

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3741
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #63 on: September 09, 2012, 12:29:24 PM »
If Cotchin becomes captain then the decision should be his. I agree with the statement "I like the idea of the captain wearing #17 but in Cotch's case if he were made captain I'd like him to keep the #9 and make it his own throughout the career. If the current crop goes onto win a flag or five   then Cotch (barring serious injury) will go down in the Club's history as up there with Dyer, KB (#29), Hart (#4) and Bourke (#30). He's a once in a generation type footballer".

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39312
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #64 on: September 09, 2012, 04:10:11 PM »
I think Cotch should stick with the No 9. The club however would need to do something else that keeps the no.17 in our supporters memory for that the club could simply name a coterie group "Club 17" or something else like that.

We already have a coterie named in Jack Dyer's honour. It's called "Jack's Club", it's limited to just 17 members and it costs a pretty penny to be part of it  :thumbsup
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Ox

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #65 on: September 09, 2012, 04:28:08 PM »


We already have a coterie named in Jack Dyer's honour. It's called "Jack's Club", it's limited to just 17 members and it costs a pretty penny to be part of it  :thumbsup

Gee Whiz -  that's so "working class"
 of the club and speaks volumes.

FO!

Ox

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #66 on: September 09, 2012, 04:44:59 PM »
Don't be afraid to scratch beneath the surface

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #67 on: September 09, 2012, 09:29:19 PM »
Just give Cotch the choice

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #68 on: September 09, 2012, 10:06:15 PM »
Don't be afraid to scratch beneath the surface

Meth mites again?

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #69 on: September 09, 2012, 11:15:07 PM »
 :lol

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #70 on: September 10, 2012, 01:36:13 AM »
Stop pushing that man. Deledio is not a 30 year old tagger with a couple of years left.

deledio will be the youngest tiger to play200 250 300 games in our history
he is a rolls royce and wants the captaincy and imo has earned it , and im not the only one who thinks so  :shh

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #71 on: September 10, 2012, 10:44:03 AM »
Lids won't get it and im not the only one who thinks so  :shh

Offline Tigger

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #72 on: September 10, 2012, 02:03:42 PM »
I like the sentiments associated with #17.

However, I truly believe that a player should make his own image in his own number.  I dont mean this in any disrespect to #17.

But 'giving up' your number to wear #17 means you lose part of the identity with 'your number'.  Imagine if Cotch or even Lids - went on to win 3 brownlows and captain the team to 3 premierships over the next 6 years - wouldnt you want that success to be in the #9 or #3?

Personally, I would.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #73 on: September 10, 2012, 02:37:00 PM »
WGAF as long as the jumper is yellow and black

I don't yell out "Go number 9!" "Great work number 3!"

Some of you sound like Melbourne supporters

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: The captaincy requiring the chosen to wear No 17.
« Reply #74 on: September 10, 2012, 02:42:28 PM »
I don't yell out "Go number 9!" "Great work number 3!"

Yeah you do. I saw you doing that one night