Author Topic: Lance Armstrong  (Read 6013 times)

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Lance Armstrong
« on: August 24, 2012, 06:32:36 PM »
I dont want to believe he cheated because his story is such an inspiration.

I know he must get sick of being accused of being a drug cheat for years(as anyone would) but giving up on fighting the allegations doesn't seem right.

Quote
THE US Anti-Doping Agency will ban Lance Armstrong from cycling for life and strip him of all his results since August, 1998, including his seven Tour de France titles.

Armstrong today dropped any further challenges to USADA's allegations that he took performance-enhancing drugs to win cycling's premier event from 1999-2005.

Armstrong says USADA doesn't have the authority to vacate his Tour titles, but USADA chief executive Travis Tygart said the anti-drug agency had the power to make that decision.

Tygart called the Armstrong case a "heartbreaking" example of a win-at-all costs approach to sports as USADA confirmed it would strip Armstrong of all results since August 1, 1998.

Armstrong, who retired last year, declined to enter arbitration - his last option - because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests that he has passed as proof of his innocence

"There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, 'enough is enough'. For me, that time is now," Armstrong said in a statement.

He called the USADA investigation an "unconstitutional witch hunt".

"I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," he said. "The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today - finished with this nonsense."

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/more-sport/lance-armstrong-accepts-usada-drug-charges/story-fnducgor-1226457338370


Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2012, 06:38:59 PM »
C H E A T

Scumbag should have to return money to everyone who bought his books.

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13936
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2012, 07:09:24 PM »
C H E A T

Scumbag should have to return money to everyone who bought his books.

i agree but can you explain what is defense was?

I have mates who are cyclists and they say he never tested positive.

I just dont understand. he either tested positive, therefore guilty or he didnt.

IMO he is guilty as there are many people ready to testify against him. It seems very hallow now reading a novel on a man who fought a disease then took drugs to be the number 1 in his sport

I

Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2012, 07:13:26 PM »
perhaps the disease was caused by his drug taking?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2012, 09:08:53 PM »
I'm 12 and what is this

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40046
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2012, 08:44:01 PM »
What I don't get is he has banged on and on about being innocent.

Now he is saying he isn't going to fight this anymore , just wants it to be over

What the?

If you are so adamant about your innocence then wouldn't you just keep fighting to clear your name

Personally I don't get it
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2012, 07:47:00 PM »
What I don't get is he has banged on and on about being innocent.

Now he is saying he isn't going to fight this anymore , just wants it to be over

What the?

If you are so adamant about your innocence then wouldn't you just keep fighting to clear your name

Personally I don't get it

If it was taking a toll on him and his family I don't blame him. I'd rather live happily with a family for the rest of my life no matter what people think of me than put up with it.

Offline Big Papa Bear

  • Premiership Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 266
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #7 on: August 27, 2012, 03:26:20 PM »
To anyone who has experienced the devastation that cancer can cause - the LIVESTRONG ethic was a tonic for the soul.

If you are innocent - you keep fighting - don't cheapen your good work.

Even if you don't do it in court - you just keep wailing the message - " I AM INNOCENT ".



Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97370
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2012, 08:38:17 PM »
The US anti-doping agency has produced a 1000 pages which in summary call Armstrong not only a cheat himself but also a ringleader of drug cheating in cycling.


Lance Armstrong was ringleader of biggest doping conspiracy in sporting history, say USADA
By Nick Hoult
The Telegragh (UK)
11 Oct 2012


Lance Armstrong’s legacy as cancer survivor turned seven-time winner of the Tour de France is in ruins after he was accused of drug-taking on a massive scale, and being the ringleader of the most sophisticated doping conspiracy in sporting history.

The United States Anti-Doping Agency charged him with six offences covering the use of banned substances, the trafficking of drugs, the administration of drugs to team-mates and aiding and abetting a massive cover-up between 1998 and 2005, a period when he dominated the world’s most famous race.

Dave Brailsford, British Cycling’s performance director who was key to Bradley Wiggins becoming the first Briton to win the Tour de France this year, said was stunned to read the USADA findings. “It is shocking, it’s jaw dropping and it is very unpleasant.”

A total of 26 witnesses including 11 fellow riders from the United States Postal Service team testified to USADA against Armstrong in a ­doping case the agency described as “more extensive than any previously revealed in professional sports ­history”. The dossier has been sent to the International Cycling Union which now has 21 days to challenge its findings and appeal to the World Anti-Doping Agency or comply with the decision to strip Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles.

In a statement on Wednesday night UCI said it will examine the evidence and “provide a timely response”.

USADA released the findings of a two-year investigation yesterday accusing Armstrong of using a cocktail of banned substances and blood transfusions. They built up a picture of an elaborate doping ring which alleged the involvement of support staff, fellow riders and even his former wife. The doping programme was the brainchild of disgraced Italian doctor, Michele Ferrari, and Armstrong would travel across Europe during and before races to have blood transfusions.

The report also accused Armstrong of administering testosterone to a team-mate, threatening fellow riders with the sack if they did not follow Dr Ferrari’s EPO programme and of surrounding himself with drug runners “so that he could achieve his goal of winning the Tour de France year after year”. The report says there was a “code of silence” in cycling as Armstrong intimidated whistle-blowers and the 200 pages of evidence referenced financial records, email traffic, and laboratory test results which the agency believes proved he was ­doping for years.

“The USPS Team doping conspiracy was professionally designed to groom and pressure athletes to use dan­gerous drugs, to evade detection, to ensure its secrecy and ultimately gain an unfair competitive advantage through superior doping practices,” the agency said. “A program ­organised by individuals who thought they were above the rules and who still play a major and active role in sport today.”

A spokesman for Armstrong accused USADA of conducting a witch-hunt. “Ignoring the 500-600 tests Lance Armstrong passed, ignoring all ­exculpatory evidence, and trying to justify the millions of dollars USADA has spent pursuing one, single athlete for years, USADA has continued its ­government funded witch-hunt of only Mr Armstrong, a retired cyclist, in violation of its own rules and due process.”

Witnesses revealed how Armstrong would receive blood transfusions in the team doctor’s hotel room during races. When police in France tightened up security Armstrong employed a drug smuggler called 'Motoman’ to deliver EPO to rendezvous points on the 1999 Tour de France route.

“Lance Armstrong and his handlers engaged in a massive and long-running scheme to use drugs, cover their tracks, intimidate witnesses, tarnish reputations, lie to hearing panels and the press and do whatever was ­necessary to conceal the truth,” said the report. Armstrong refused to co-operate with the investigation but in September, after losing a legal suit challenging USADA’s jurisdiction, he decided not to contest their case and was stripped of his seven Tour de France victories.

Armstrong himself remained defiant last night, tweeting that he was "hanging with family".

The report lays bare his relationship with Dr Ferrari and includes records from Swiss banks detailing payments by Armstrong of more than $1 million to the Italian doctor.

Damning testimony was provided by some of the leading cyclists of the 1990s and 2000s. Some had been thrown out of the sport as drug users but others owned up to USADA for the first time about their own drug taking including Canadian Michael Barry who competed in the 2010 Tour de France alongside Bradley Wiggins for Team Sky.

The most personally damaging aspect for Armstrong was the testimony provided by George Hincapie, who was alongside him for his seven tour victories, and also never failed a drug test in his career. In the past Armstrong described him as “true blue, like a brother to me”. Hincapie confessed to doping and how his role as domestique stretched to off the road as well. In 2005 he was told by the team’s director, Johan Bruyneel, to sweep Armstrong’s apartment for any drug material.

Other riders revealed how they witnessed Armstrong use drugs. Jonathan Vaughters testified he saw Armstrong inject himself with EPO at the 1998 Vuelta a España while Floyd Landis corroborated the story that Armstrong failed a dope test at the Tour of Switzerland in 2001.

Landis told the team manager and Armstrong “flew to the UCI headquarters and made a financial agreement to keep the positive test hidden”. The report states Pat McQuaid, the current president of UCI, denied the allegation.

The report homes in on each of Armstrong’s tour victories and details his drug use in each race. Tyler Hamilton, whose recently published book included a string of explosive allegations about Armstrong, revealed how he found EPO in Armstrong’s fridge. Armstrong was also accused of using illegal substances when he came out of retirement to compete in the 2009 and 2010 Tours de France, producing blood results with the odds of “occurring naturally less than one in a million”.

On a dark day for cycling, the report revealed 20 of the 21 podium finishers in the Tour de France from 1999-2005 have been directly tied to likely doping and concluded by saying “so ends one of the most sordid chapters in sporting history.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9600577/Lance-Armstrong-was-ringleader-of-biggest-doping-conspiracy-in-sporting-history-say-USADA.html

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13936
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2012, 09:22:37 PM »
to quote Sandy Roberts

What more can you say!!
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline tiger101

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2012, 12:34:18 AM »
AN Australian specialist has emerged as a key figure in the case against Lance Armstrong, who has been labelled a serial drug cheat by the US Anti-Doping Agency.

And Cycling Australia's president has backed the idea of a doping amnesty to make a clean break from its tainted past.
The Australian newspaper reports Christopher Gore, the head of physiology at the Australian Institute of Sport in Canberra, was asked by USADA to examine blood samples taken from Armstrong between October 2008 and April this year.
According to the USADA case file, Gore found the samples to have had an unusually low percentage of reticulocytes, or immature red blood cells, which are created naturally by the body," the newspaper report says.

When additional red blood cells are added via a transfusion, the body's production of reticulocytes is suppressed.
Gore found the approximate likelihood of Armstrong's reticulocyte values during the 2009 and 2010 Tours de France occurring naturally was less than one in a million, the file reads.
USADA concluded that the findings "build a compelling argument consistent with blood doping", despite not being a conventional antidoping test, the New York Times reported.
AIS director Matt Favier praised the work of Gore, who has been with the Institute for more than 20 years
"He has two professorships and is well positioned as an internationally recognised expert," Favier told Fairfax.
"Given his expertise and impeccable credentials, Professor Gore has provided an evidence-based opinion on perturbation in various factors found in the blood of athletes in several anti-doping cases.
"Professor Gore was also a key researcher in work prior to the Sydney Olympic Games that provided the basis for the current process that identifies abnormal levels of markers in an athlete's bloodstream. Moreover, the basic model of the so called 'athlete blood passport' now used by WADA and USADA is built on the foundation of that 1999-2000 research project, which was funded by the IOC."
The Armstrong revelations have triggered huge reactions around the world, with this year's Tour de France champion Bradley Wiggins admitting he has been shocked by the mountain of evidence against the American.
Meanwhile Cycling Australia president Klaus Mueller has backed the idea of a doping amnesty, despite the sport's world governing body backing away from the concept.

The Cycling Australia (CA) boss said it was too early to tell whether the hundreds of pages of documents would implicate anyone in Australian cycling.
In the wake of the Armstrong case, there have been calls in the sport for an amnesty or the equivalent of a truth and reconciliation commission.
The idea is for cycling to air any dirty secrets in regards to doping and make a clean break from its tainted past.
"It might now be time to consider a range of options including an amnesty for athletes who have cheated in the past to own up to any wrongdoing and have their confessions mitigate any subsequent penalties," Mueller said in a statement.
"This would be dependent on the nature and extent of any infractions.
"This case also provides an opportunity for the Australian Government to review the resources and powers of ASADA (the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency) especially in light of the extensive investigation and action taken by USADA in their pursuit of this case."
Last month, cycling's world body the UCI adopted a motion at their annual congress which called on the governing body to deal with current doping cases and "ignore attempts to exploit commercially or otherwise the painful aspects of cycling's past".

http://www.news.com.au/sport/ais-head-of-physiology-christopher-gore-played-key-role-in-usadas-lance-armstrong-case/story-fnect155-1226494307629

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97370
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2012, 03:01:35 AM »

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40046
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2012, 08:02:54 AM »
Does anyone really care anymore?

Heard this morning one of the companies that paid him millions in bonuses after he "won" the Tour de France wants its money back  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2012, 04:31:03 PM »
Why don't they just bin cycling all together? How many of the last 20 tour de France titles have been won by someone clean? It seems like 80% of these guys are cheats. poo sport.

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Lance Armstrong
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2012, 04:47:10 PM »
cycling is irrelevant. it's like people that speed walk and think it's a sport. get a motorbike. you dont see steroids in motogp.

as my uncle jason used to say, "leather over lycra"