« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: The Edwards incident [Update: in the clear]  (Read 1945 times)

Dubstep Dookie

  • Guest
The Edwards incident [Update: in the clear]
« on: August 24, 2012, 09:36:58 PM »
The Monfries Milk/head snap-back against Edwards....

Edwards was reported for striking but does Monfries actually own a set?

Just asking


Update: Titch cleared. MRP said the force used was below that required to constitute a report.  :thumbsup
« Last Edit: August 27, 2012, 02:32:41 PM by one-eyed »
Logged

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 939
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2012, 09:42:19 PM »
It was a high fend off, 50m would have been an adequate penalty, embarrassing report by that umpy.
Logged

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2012, 09:46:31 PM »
More-frees is a skirt.

Sheds has been a bit of a niggler tonight  :thumbsup
Logged

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2012, 10:24:02 PM »
Nil impact
Logged
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2012, 10:50:54 PM »
great game by titch :clapping :clapping :clapping
Logged

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2012, 11:57:40 PM »
Logged
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7355
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2012, 01:48:32 AM »
Dismissed! Joke! Umpires prob % wise highest in society pooftas
Logged

Ox

  • Guest
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2012, 02:26:57 AM »
stuffen sissy
« Last Edit: August 25, 2012, 04:49:51 AM by one-eyed »
Logged

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2012, 02:43:51 AM »
There's no place in our game for this.

Edwards will get 4-5 weeks.
Logged
Quote from: the claw on December 10, 2013, 11:44:23 PM
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
Quote from: the claw on January 09, 2014, 09:00:49 PM
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 97383
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2012, 04:51:27 AM »
Logged

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2012, 05:31:04 AM »
Played a very good first qtr, went missing for the next two, then bobbed up for a good last qtr but by that time the Dons were gone, physicaly and mentaly.
Logged
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13938
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2012, 10:07:19 AM »
thought his game was good.

i dont care about goals, behinds this that

i like the aggression he shows at times, giving it to players jumper punches etc etc

Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

TigerTimeII

  • Guest
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2012, 10:16:31 AM »
monfries should go for diving
Logged

Offline cub

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 7355
  • "Tigertime!"
    • bantigertrade
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2012, 11:49:13 AM »
Why can't you say p00f ??????????? V
Logged

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: The Edwards incident
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2012, 12:09:26 PM »
Is that footage doctored? Because I can't see More-free's tutu.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »