Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44? All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 
Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.
Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?
Regardless of players involved.... 
.......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...
This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1. 
How is Tyson a top up player? He's a kid in his second year of senior football, would easily go in the top 10 if he was in this years draft. The kid is a young gun, who actually has an extra year of development under his belt 
Ok, I DID NOT NAME HIM AS A TOP UP PLAYER.......IS THAT CLEAR?????? I was generalising.
I said I wouldn't trade away pick 9 thats it, clear cut, nothing to read into. Enough said, IMO we keep pick 9...pretty easy to understand..
Mate, it's actually not easy to understand. In fact it's plain irrational.
If Tyson is seen by the club as better than their best couple of picks in the current draft and we can do the deal with pick 9, we do it. If they don't, we leave it.
If he is our best teenage option, it makes sense because :-
- He is still a teenager so it makes no difference from an age perspective
- he removes us from the lottery of a draft
- we get a kid with an extra Pre season under his belt.
I would understand us not trading pick 9 for Ablett because we are still trying to build our list with quality kids - which might by WATs point.
