Richmond targets a GWS young gun

[Judge Roughneck]

Not a real pick nine thou, was he?

Given the amount of players of his age group removed from the draft

[Loui Tufga]

Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44?  All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 

Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.

Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?

Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...

This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1.

How is Tyson a top up player? He's a kid in his second year of senior football, would easily go in the top 10 if he was in this years draft. The kid is a young gun, who actually has an extra year of development under his belt

[Loui Tufga]

Not a real pick nine thou, was he?

Given the amount of players of his age group removed from the draft

He went Pick 3

[WA Tiger]

Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44?  All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 

Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.

Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?

Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...

This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1.

How is Tyson a top up player? He's a kid in his second year of senior football, would easily go in the top 10 if he was in this years draft. The kid is a young gun, who actually has an extra year of development under his belt

Ok, I DID NOT NAME HIM AS A TOP UP PLAYER.......IS THAT CLEAR?????? I was generalising.

I said I wouldn't trade away pick 9 thats it, clear cut, nothing to read into. Enough said, IMO we keep pick 9...pretty easy to understand..

[JVT]

Wow, you wouldn't give Pick 9 for Ablett?? The best player in the competition?

[gerkin greg]

[tigs2011]

Word on BF is Tyson's dad is a leading coterie member at Richmond. Dom himself grew up as a massive Tigers supporter.

His father ceratinly isn't listed in the 2012 Coterie Members on the C'ub's web-site 

And as long as it isn't Hoskin-Elliott - in the few GWS games I watched he was a disappointment

From what I've heard, we're talking to WHE for next year. 

We'd want to get Tyson signed first otherwise it's going to be hard to land both next year. Would make a formidable midfield though.

[Francois Jackson]

Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44?  All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 

Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.

Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?

Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...

This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1.

sorry mate i dont agree with this at all.

Pick 9 for a young rising player is exactly what we should be using that pick on.

If thats through the draft or a kid like WHE or Dyson then so be it

A gun player who has already been in the system 12 months is icing on the cake.

[Penelope]

not sure why the angst against sheedy and GWS. They havent taken anyone from us and actually got us morris with very little in return. Sheedy did us a favour with that one

GWS and Sheedy weren't trying to do us any favours when they threw the kitchen sink at Dusty when he'd only played 5 or 6 games for us.  We had to move quickly and sign Dusty on bigger bucks than he was worth at the time..... f**k GWS  !! No prisoners !

I just knew someone would misinterpret this.
I am not saying dont do it, i just cant understand the spite leveled towards GWS and sheedy.

This is why i said that "I cant understand the angst", which is a bit different to saying "oohh, don't take anyone from GWS"

[tony_montana]

Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44?  All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 

Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.

Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?

Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...

This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1.

Wow.... Pick 3>>>>>>>pick 9 dude, Dom Tyson went pick 3 last season, pick 3 and is a stuffing jet in the making, better than anything we'll get at pick 9 this draft..... But yeah we wouldn't be picking up a young gun with pick 9 if we did the above 

[tony_montana]

not sure why the angst against sheedy and GWS. They havent taken anyone from us and actually got us morris with very little in return. Sheedy did us a favour with that one

GWS and Sheedy weren't trying to do us any favours when they threw the kitchen sink at Dusty when he'd only played 5 or 6 games for us.  We had to move quickly and sign Dusty on bigger bucks than he was worth at the time..... f**k GWS  !! No prisoners !

I just knew someone would misinterpret this.
I am not saying dont do it, i just cant understand the spite leveled towards GWS and sheedy.

This is why i said that "I cant understand the angst", which is a bit different to saying "oohh, don't take anyone from GWS"

Maybe u should have said "I can't understand the degree of angst" 

[Penelope]

  perhaps....

[Penelope]

anways, if it is Tyson, how the eff do we get him if GWS have the poos and dont want to do business. He is contracted isnt he? and GWS are unlikely to let him go for pick 9

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Pick 9 and Nahas. You could throw in Post too!

As one famous supporter keeps on saying....

Get it done Tiges!!!!

[Loui Tufga]

Pick 9 and Nahas and Graham for Tyson and Pick 21 / 24 and Pick 44?  All of them have 1 year left on contracts. 

Need to keep pick 9, we don't need to trade away picks like this, regardless.

Would you swap pick 9 for pick 3?

Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9...

This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1.

How is Tyson a top up player? He's a kid in his second year of senior football, would easily go in the top 10 if he was in this years draft. The kid is a young gun, who actually has an extra year of development under his belt

Ok, I DID NOT NAME HIM AS A TOP UP PLAYER.......IS THAT CLEAR?????? I was generalising.

I said I wouldn't trade away pick 9 thats it, clear cut, nothing to read into. Enough said, IMO we keep pick 9...pretty easy to understand..

Then why mention "Top Up Players" when it is clear that the thread and all the discussions in it are related to pick 9 and Dom Tyson????

Re Read what you wrote! You said....Regardless of players involved.... .......no I wouldn't take Judd or Ablett for pick 9... Then then directly after that you wrote....This has been our past problem, too many people thought we needed top up players in 95.......we need to pick a young gun with pick 9 not trade it away, unless it's for pick 1. :whistl

So what are you trying to say exactly??

LMAO at the way you back peddle and add disclaimers every time you post something stupid