Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
I personally think he should be given the next 6 weeks to just go for it. Give him his head a little and let's see what happens. Getting 3 or 4 weeks can't be great for his confidence or willingness to take a few risks.
Quote from: tony_montana on July 17, 2016, 01:08:25 PMQuote from: Hard Roar Tiger on July 17, 2016, 01:05:50 PMQuote from: Owl on July 17, 2016, 11:10:28 AMActually watched him do some very clever subtle things when under a lot of pressure. Got the ball to our players a lot with deft taps etc. Didn't do a lot of spectacular marking or stuff but ran all day and is definitely improving for another run. Keep playing for mine.For starters, he at least trying. He's also adjusting to the pace of AFL. He's made a good contribution by working hard up the lines and competing which is something Vickery isn't even fit enough to do despite being on our list for twice the time.yep, I dont think anyone could possibly question his work ethic or smarts vs gimpery, but just saying physically he looks like a raw first or 2nd year player not one thats been in the system for 4 years.he was very tall and skinny when draftedwhat were you expecting lebron james?hence he was a later pick and a 'risk'hes going ok was never going to b wayne carey b y now
Quote from: Hard Roar Tiger on July 17, 2016, 01:05:50 PMQuote from: Owl on July 17, 2016, 11:10:28 AMActually watched him do some very clever subtle things when under a lot of pressure. Got the ball to our players a lot with deft taps etc. Didn't do a lot of spectacular marking or stuff but ran all day and is definitely improving for another run. Keep playing for mine.For starters, he at least trying. He's also adjusting to the pace of AFL. He's made a good contribution by working hard up the lines and competing which is something Vickery isn't even fit enough to do despite being on our list for twice the time.yep, I dont think anyone could possibly question his work ethic or smarts vs gimpery, but just saying physically he looks like a raw first or 2nd year player not one thats been in the system for 4 years.
Quote from: Owl on July 17, 2016, 11:10:28 AMActually watched him do some very clever subtle things when under a lot of pressure. Got the ball to our players a lot with deft taps etc. Didn't do a lot of spectacular marking or stuff but ran all day and is definitely improving for another run. Keep playing for mine.For starters, he at least trying. He's also adjusting to the pace of AFL. He's made a good contribution by working hard up the lines and competing which is something Vickery isn't even fit enough to do despite being on our list for twice the time.
Actually watched him do some very clever subtle things when under a lot of pressure. Got the ball to our players a lot with deft taps etc. Didn't do a lot of spectacular marking or stuff but ran all day and is definitely improving for another run. Keep playing for mine.
Does he present well for marks? Too slow, or can't break free of defenders? I just couldn't tell, he competes well in the mauls but never seems to present much of a lead. Might watch the games again, he was hard to spot..lol
FJ is the only one that makes sense.
Doesn't provide much defensive pressurre in the forward 50 but works 10 x harder than Vickery elsewhere....no doubt Ty will come back next week after his "decent" match today (i.e. less than shyte)but it really should be for Griffiths or Hamspud(seriously don't give a toss about hit outs at this point) who were both abysmal, not McBean...will be a joke otherwise...
Sorry but won't make it.I hope he proves me wrong though.....