Has she, or has she not, overseen the most amount of sustained on field and off field success than any other president in rrecent years? Either way, my point is this, her gender and her ethnicity seems to be brought up as a reason why she fails as a president or is not up it, not her actions or achievements.
Sorry, but you have lost count of the order of questioning. You brought into question of the nationality and gender of our president and the direction of the RFC. I asked what she has done wrong. You have answered that with another question. That tells me you can't formulate a response based on fact, you would rather use gender and race.
Yes..I understand what you have done.
What she has done wrong is, she's done nothing.
Perhaps now you could answer my question.
What has she done?
Suppose it all depends on what people think the role of a president involves.
But back to the actual topic and whether we should consider replacing Cotchin as Captain and Robbo's article
I think in a lot of cases clubs live by the ethos that their best player needs to be captain because somehow they are going to be great leaders.
I don't agree with that idea as it doesn't always work.
Look at GC, Ablett is without doubt their best player but I don't think he is a good captain. Ditto Pendlebury, gun player not sure he is ag great captain.
Yes at some clubs their best player is their captain eg Melbourne and Jones, Geelong and Selwood
But you look at other clubs Are Jack and McVeigh Sydney's best players? Bob Murphy at the Bulldogs?
Boak? No, actually You could even make case with Hodge and Hawthorn.
Maybe what the RFC needs to do is to look at having a leader rather thinking our best player is the best option.
As I said I thought Robbo's article was an very interesting read and a worthy one that opened up a interesting and probably important discussion