Author Topic: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)  (Read 3527 times)

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2013, 01:07:30 PM »
:bow
you know what he meant al  ::)

 ;D

Yes al, don't act stupid please.. :thumbsup
not acting.
care to explain that sentence then?

Not acting. Must mean you are then.. :whistle
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2013, 01:52:27 PM »
so you cant, or wont explain that strange sentence?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Danog

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2013, 01:55:31 PM »
Gonna agree with al here.  How does King relate at all to Grimes or Chaplin?

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #18 on: January 31, 2013, 01:57:59 PM »
so you cant, or wont explain that strange sentence?

Understand if you can, the only strange thing is you, others understood it, I was not relating King playing to our back line.

1. King will play!
2. I believe that if Grimes and Chap don't play our back line could be exposed..

FFS, Come back tomorrow and we can go through your ABC.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2013, 02:16:40 PM »
If you were not relating them to king, when why mention them in the same sentence, in a thread about king, (coming from the stay on topic copper?)

I'm happy to go through my ABCs, or more relevantly , grammar, the English language and how to clearly convey your thoughts.

Perhaps there is some merit to the 1000 monkeys theory after all?
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2013, 02:45:07 PM »
so you cant, or wont explain that strange sentence?

Understand if you can, the only strange thing is you, others understood it, I was not relating King playing to our back line.

1. King will play!
2. I believe that if Grimes and Chap don't play our back line could be exposed..

FFS, Come back tomorrow and we can go through your ABC.

King hasen't played down back for 18 months and I doubt he ever will again..........McG will go back before King..

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2013, 03:08:31 PM »
Blind Freddy could see bachelor is a natural defender.

King will play, we will a bit short down back with Chapman and Grimes out, could really expose us, particularly if Kruz pushes forward.  :-\

Is Grimes a certainty not to play. I would imagine that would leave us with Rance, Griffiths and perhaps Astbury. Not ideal but if they go tall to exploit this problem then they may have to. The other option is to play Batchelor instead of Astbury who can play tall if needed. In the past though it has been their small forwards that have hurt us not their talls.

Didn't they try going tall last year and kept going through Post's bloke? I thought it was a bit rough on Batchelor not to play, just because his Nob Cup was a bit average when they tried him in the midfield. Really rate him as a genuine footballer and handy as a med-defender to handle the odd tall player and back up the other defenders. I'm hoping Grimes is ready but from what I can tell he is 50/50 for round 1? Spewing about Chaplin. Will be a massive plus without bring a superstar but it sounds like we recruited him straight out of a car accident. Will be spewing if we're out both of them.

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2013, 05:18:51 PM »
Gonna agree with al here.  How does King relate at all to Grimes or Chaplin?

It's Chapman FFS

Offline yellowandback

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2013, 07:51:33 PM »
If you were not relating them to king, when why mention them in the same sentence, in a thread about king, (coming from the stay on topic copper?)

I'm happy to go through my ABCs, or more relevantly , grammar, the English language and how to clearly convey your thoughts.

Perhaps there is some merit to the 1000 monkeys theory after all?

"We had the best of times, we had the blurst of times, you stupid monkey oh shut up"
It's that simple Spud
"I discussed (it) with my three daughters, my wife and my 82-year-old mum, because it has really affected me … If those comments … were made about one of my daughters, it would make the hairs on the back of my neck stand up. I would not have liked it at all.”

Offline tigers_of_old_1980

  • Jack Dyer medallist
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2013, 08:35:16 PM »
King is in our best 22 for now, and his particular skills will be needed Rnd1. No question about it.
10 PREMIERSHIPS

Offline Penelope

  • Internet nuffer and sooky jellyfish
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2013, 10:06:35 PM »
If you were not relating them to king, when why mention them in the same sentence, in a thread about king, (coming from the stay on topic copper?)

I'm happy to go through my ABCs, or more relevantly , grammar, the English language and how to clearly convey your thoughts.

Perhaps there is some merit to the 1000 monkeys theory after all?

"We had the best of times, we had the blurst of times, you stupid monkey oh shut up"
:lol
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
Nor are your ways my ways,” says the Lord.
 
“For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
So are my ways higher than your ways,
And my thoughts than your thoughts."

Yahweh? or the great Clawski?

yaw rehto eht dellorcs ti fi daer ot reisae eb dluow tI

gerkin greg

  • Guest
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2013, 10:50:13 PM »
If you were not relating them to king, when why mention them in the same sentence, in a thread about king, (coming from the stay on topic copper?)

I'm happy to go through my ABCs, or more relevantly , grammar, the English language and how to clearly convey your thoughts.

Perhaps there is some merit to the 1000 monkeys theory after all?

"We had the best of times, we had the blurst of times, you stupid monkey oh shut up"

 :lol

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #27 on: February 01, 2013, 08:42:15 AM »
King is in our best 22 for now, and his particular skills will be needed Rnd1. No question about it.

YES!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Loui Tufga

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
  • Beaver BLT
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #28 on: February 01, 2013, 10:24:02 AM »
King is in our best 22 for now, and his particular skills will be needed Rnd1. No question about it.

YES!

Best 22 maybe? Best back 6 NOT! If we're low on players in the back line King is the last guy that will be thrown back there :wallywink

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Jake King up Richmond Tigers' sleeve ...... (Herald-Sun)
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2013, 12:10:33 PM »
King is in our best 22 for now, and his particular skills will be needed Rnd1. No question about it.

YES!

Best 22 maybe? Best back 6 NOT! If we're low on players in the back line King is the last guy that will be thrown back there :wallywink

Hope you had a great holiday TFT, BTW I never said to play him back, I said he will play, Hardwick loves him!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"