Author Topic: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?  (Read 6046 times)

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 100494
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #60 on: March 30, 2013, 01:19:25 PM »
Can someone tell the SEN crew earlier on today (Robbo, Dermie & Walls) it's "Griffiths" not "Griffin"  :wallywink.

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #61 on: March 30, 2013, 01:22:18 PM »
Can someone tell the SEN crew earlier on today (Robbo, Dermie & Walls) it's "Griffiths" not "Griffin"  :wallywink.
Wallsy had it right
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

dwaino

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #62 on: March 30, 2013, 02:13:08 PM »
Big Benny Giffin  :clapping

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #63 on: April 01, 2013, 09:21:19 AM »
Time for Griff to go forward, Grimes should come in and play back, time to try Griff forward and play Riewoldt up the ground again or vice versa!
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #64 on: April 01, 2013, 10:02:47 AM »
Time for Griff to go forward, Grimes should come in and play back, time to try Griff forward and play Riewoldt up the ground again or vice versa!

Griff, McG, Jack and Ty is too big of a forward line. Jack is the only consistent player there. At the same time I reckon Chaps, Griffo, Grimes and Rance is too tall down back unless Chappy or Griffith play as the floater.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13333
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #65 on: April 01, 2013, 10:04:09 AM »
Dont think there is room up forward for another tall with Ty, JR and McGawn.  McGawn is the obvious that should go but the way he was playing at the end of this year and the first game this year means he wont be going anywhere in the near future.

Ruanaidh

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #66 on: April 01, 2013, 12:59:30 PM »
We need a Tall (200cm) backman to play on resting rucks (the new evolution). Ben will be going nowhere.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #67 on: April 01, 2013, 01:02:13 PM »
In theory one of grimes/rance/Chaplin should be able to play of a ruck sized forward. In reserve; Astbury is tall. Mcbean plays in a pocket. Finding three tall backs to cover Jack-Vickery-Griffiths may stretch some sides.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2013, 11:55:26 PM by Bentleigh-esque »

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: Ben Griffiths - 2013 expectations?
« Reply #68 on: April 01, 2013, 01:04:35 PM »
Selection will be interesting this week.if grimes is available ,does he come straight back in? one would think he's a monty.
Secondly we must also take into consideration the fleet of smalish forwards the saints have.