Author Topic: James Frawley  (Read 24574 times)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #105 on: December 04, 2013, 07:33:45 PM »
According to Claw this is the scientifically proven method the club uses for draft selection.  ;D


:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline Eat_em_Alive

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4858
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #106 on: December 04, 2013, 09:35:38 PM »
According to Claw this is the scientifically proven method the club uses for draft selection.  ;D


:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping :clapping


Yesss Tiga!! Listen to craw
The anywhere, anytime Tigers.
E A T  E M  A L I V E  M O F O S

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #107 on: December 04, 2013, 09:39:53 PM »
id vote claw for bennys gales right hand man

Offline wayne

  • Fame of Hall
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8544
  • In Absentia
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #108 on: December 05, 2013, 08:44:47 AM »
According to Claw this is the scientifically proven method the club uses for draft selection.  ;D



 :lol
And you may not think I care for you
When you know down inside that I really do

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5260
  • All up inside ya.
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #109 on: December 05, 2013, 01:12:21 PM »
Being critical of the club now and again is fine but when you seek out opportunities to deride the club I love, while simultaneously praising poo clubs and players, to me that points to something more sinister than just a skeptical fan, and I don't take kindly to it.

Clearly I wasn't blaming Claw for our past failures. My point was that egotistical, misguided know-it-alls were a big part of our demise and i reckon those are the words you will find under 'the Claw' in the OER dictionary.

I've actually said that he makes some interesting  points at times, but IMO these are tiny truth nuggets amongst a steaming pile of negative horse poo. To be fair, im sure he feels the same about my posts, but there you go.

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5260
  • All up inside ya.
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #110 on: December 05, 2013, 01:19:00 PM »
Ps. Magnificent work again Tiga.

 :lol

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #111 on: December 05, 2013, 02:01:51 PM »
Brilliant tiga. I would have changed bankrupt to st.failda personally.  ;D

Gigantor

  • Guest
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #112 on: December 05, 2013, 06:29:36 PM »
Theres an old saying

"I might disagree with what you say but i'll fight for your right to say it"..or something like that

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #113 on: December 05, 2013, 08:27:14 PM »
Thanks to Wayne's mate I've forgotten what Adelaide's petrenkos first name is?  >:(

the claw

  • Guest
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #114 on: December 05, 2013, 10:55:42 PM »
Melbourne got Bernie Spud Vince on a 4 year deal at the age of 28 and gave up pick 2 for Dom Tyson who has shown nothing.

Misguided, egotistical fools like yourself dragged this club to the pits over the last three decades. Thank stuff your likes have been weeded out.

Bernie Vince at least played 21 games last season for Adelaide.

A Edwards played 9 for North before we traded for him at age 28.
Knights played 5 for Adelaide before we Free Agented him.
Petterd played 4 for Melbourne before delisting.
Stephenson played 8 for Geelong before delisting at age 30.
Gordon, Banfield and Thomas all played no AFL and were all delisted.

When you look at our recruiting over the last couple of years it's a bit much to criticise other clubs for older players like Vince.
The Tyson pick will only be judged by comparison with Josh Kelly in a few years time.
shhesh and here i was thinking melborne did fantastic in the tyson trade.

lets see with all the emotion aside what was that deal

i believe melbopurne recieved dom tyson.  a prodigious talent.  geez a talent we really wanted  maybe we were idiots as well. a bloke who was a number 3 pick who has not struggled with afl footy, no  lets be perfectly clear here hes been great when hes been up and going. no hes had some injury issues. so in some deluded minds this means he cant play.

they also recieved pick 9 and used it on who, please enlighten me was it christian salem???   geez a bloke we were all over. but wait hes at melbourne hes now a freaken hack as well. so instead of getting say kelly they get tyson and salem  yet somehow this is translated to melbourne traded for hacks.
thats bloody rich when you consider we traded for hampson with what pick was it again.


yeah im happy to have some fun and put my gut feel on the line and suggest melbourne could possibl;y finish above us. they will certainly finish with in a few games .

just to finish ive said all yr and last yr there are a lot of sides within a realistic bulls roar of each other. ive never ever really felt melbourne were as bad talent wise as people were painting them up.
me i dont flow with crowds i have my own views and i raise em.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #115 on: December 05, 2013, 10:59:08 PM »
According to Claw this is the scientifically proven method the club uses for draft selection.  ;D


take it from one who knows son.  if they had taken the listen to claw option the last 10 or 12 yrs would have landed at least one premiership.

humerous  by the way. i even cracked a smile.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #116 on: December 05, 2013, 11:10:25 PM »
Being critical of the club now and again is fine but when you seek out opportunities to deride the club I love, while simultaneously praising poo clubs and players, to me that points to something more sinister than just a skeptical fan, and I don't take kindly to it.

Clearly I wasn't blaming Claw for our past failures. My point was that egotistical, misguided know-it-alls were a big part of our demise and i reckon those are the words you will find under 'the Claw' in the OER dictionary.

I've actually said that he makes some interesting  points at times, but IMO these are tiny truth nuggets amongst a steaming pile of negative horse poo. To be fair, im sure he feels the same about my posts, but there you go.

now i take issue with this. i dont deride the club. all ive ever done is speak the truth if you dont like it tough. know it all where. on almost ever occasion i criticise i bakck it up with why i think whaty i think.
you know what i can come across all smug and high and mighty for one simple reason.
over the yrs most things ive said have time and time again been correct. the truth just hurts sometimes.

ive gotta ask where else does an average supporter voice his concerns and air his grievances about his footy side  but on a footy forum about said side.

you know what when and only when we actually win something anything, when we manage to perform in big games when it actually counts. when we regularly manage to beat good sides maybe then you can come on here and say claw you were freakin wrong shut the f up. until that actually happens i will voice my displeasure and raise my concerns just like i have for the past 12 yrs ive been on footy forums.

a spade ios a spade im only interested in calling it what it is imo of course.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #117 on: December 05, 2013, 11:28:24 PM »
There's a lot of rubbish in this thread.
Someone tell me- why is Frawleys name mentioned?

free agent next year oxx, just discussing the merits of having a crack at him

If that's the case, I'm in.
Frawleys owe us!
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #118 on: December 05, 2013, 11:40:30 PM »
lol @ claw being king of the christian salem bandwagon

Offline Willy

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5260
  • All up inside ya.
Re: James Frawley
« Reply #119 on: December 06, 2013, 09:15:30 AM »
Being critical of the club now and again is fine but when you seek out opportunities to deride the club I love, while simultaneously praising poo clubs and players, to me that points to something more sinister than just a skeptical fan, and I don't take kindly to it.

Clearly I wasn't blaming Claw for our past failures. My point was that egotistical, misguided know-it-alls were a big part of our demise and i reckon those are the words you will find under 'the Claw' in the OER dictionary.

I've actually said that he makes some interesting  points at times, but IMO these are tiny truth nuggets amongst a steaming pile of negative horse poo. To be fair, im sure he feels the same about my posts, but there you go.

now i take issue with this. i dont deride the club. all ive ever done is speak the truth if you dont like it tough. know it all where. on almost ever occasion i criticise i bakck it up with why i think whaty i think.
you know what i can come across all smug and high and mighty for one simple reason.
over the yrs most things ive said have time and time again been correct. the truth just hurts sometimes.

ive gotta ask where else does an average supporter voice his concerns and air his grievances about his footy side  but on a footy forum about said side.

you know what when and only when we actually win something anything, when we manage to perform in big games when it actually counts. when we regularly manage to beat good sides maybe then you can come on here and say claw you were freakin wrong shut the f up. until that actually happens i will voice my displeasure and raise my concerns just like i have for the past 12 yrs ive been on footy forums.

a spade ios a spade im only interested in calling it what it is imo of course.


My problem is that to you, a spade in Richmond colours is inferior to a spade in any other. You look for ways to criticize the club because you have a chip on your shoulder.

And your opinions aren't as good as you think they are. You are an Internet panic merchant not a list manager. Get over yourself.