« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dusty V Conca  (Read 1140 times)

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Dusty V Conca
« on: September 17, 2013, 10:26:28 AM »
If we have a choice who would you want to keep?
It would not be too good if we lost both of them.
Logged

Offline tigs2011

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2013, 10:28:47 AM »
Conca. I hope we trade Dusty. Time to shed the baggage IMO
Logged

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2013, 02:06:04 PM »
I must say that after reading so many articles about him he could either be very good or very bad.

If he was to be very good (and RFC has done so much for him, he would have to consider where he would be without all the effort RFC had put into him, probably playing with Connors for $500.00 a game in the country) then we keep him.

If very bad then it just does not fit within our philosphy and way forward, so we lose him.

If you look at his history that is not so good, but he has matured well and hopefully has learnt a few things, mind you planning a trip to USA with the St Kilda boys would not seem to be a great career move and probably shows where his heart truly is?

Whatever happens I think if he turned out to embrace RFC and our new culture then he will be a RFC champion. We can only hope the footy gods cards of fate fall our way, whatever the final outcome
Logged

Offline TigerMonk

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2013, 02:50:39 PM »
Dusty because he is strong & stable body. Prepared to take on anyone in the game where Conca is still learning
Logged

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40322
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2013, 03:02:45 PM »
Dusty

though they are very different types of player

As I posted on another thread on his day he can be a match winner and they don't grow on trees

Dusty has the ability to be an elite player on the comp; one of the top 5 within the next 2-3 years IMHO. He is a natural footballer. The fact he can play as a mid who can rest forward and give you 2-3 goals a game. You could even play as a lead up forward because he such a strong mark. So much upside
Logged
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Online MintOnLamb

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 3748
  • You have to think anyway, so why not think big? DT
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2013, 03:24:57 PM »
Quote from: WilliamPowell on September 17, 2013, 03:02:45 PM
Dusty

though they are very different types of player

As I posted on another thread on his day he can be a match winner and they don't grow on trees

Dusty has the ability to be an elite player on the comp; one of the top 5 within the next 2-3 years IMHO. He is a natural footballer. The fact he can play as a mid who can rest forward and give you 2-3 goals a game. You could even play as a lead up forward because he such a strong mark. So much upside
WP I guess the upside for Dusty is enormous and in reality he is a game breaking versatile talent. Conca just does not have his flair and he has the hammy which hopefully is not as serious as grimes. At the moment they both have a downside, Conca is a year older and probably more mature but how much improvement has he got in him? Martin a year younger and if he can get his brain on track....the sky may well be the limit.
Logged

Offline Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2013, 03:26:37 PM »
lol Conca please

Logged
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13305
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2013, 05:08:29 PM »
I like Conca but Dusty by a mile
Logged

Offline Yeahright

  • Moderator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 9394
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2013, 05:42:41 PM »
Quote from: MintOnLamb on September 17, 2013, 03:24:57 PM

, Conca is a year older and probably more mature

Conca is younger, but still more mature :lol
Logged

Offline Golfprotiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
  • Risking Head and Shin
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2013, 09:13:24 PM »
Dusty,

Everyday, strong takes them ALL on that's what we want!
Logged
Tommy Hafey - "There's nothing more tiger-ish than a bloody tiger, a wounded tiger''

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2013, 09:27:39 PM »
Neither we need to bring back Craig Ednie, Clay Sampson ,Ross Funcke and Ben Moore.
Logged

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5340
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2013, 10:51:07 PM »
Both players!
Logged

Offline westerntiger

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Dusty V Conca
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2013, 11:17:54 PM »
Quote from: Yeahright on September 17, 2013, 05:42:41 PM
Quote from: MintOnLamb on September 17, 2013, 03:24:57 PM

, Conca is a year older and probably more mature

Conca is younger, but still more mature :lol

Yes, correct  :)
Martin born 91, Conca 92. And I agree on the maturity.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »