Author Topic: Paul Chapman?  (Read 20905 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #210 on: April 07, 2014, 03:23:33 PM »
Then you would put lots of charlie in yo bum hole

Online Francois Jackson

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14049
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #211 on: April 07, 2014, 03:28:19 PM »
Chapman is 32. Seriously what's the point in bringing a 32 year old with paper hamstrings to the club ?
 We have some talented kids on the list. Give a couple of them a go. And when I say a go , I don't mean what they did to McDonut. One game and then out. That's just crap.

agree with this.

griffiths perfect example. Look how he is coming along.
Currently a member of the Roupies, and employed by the great man Roup.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #212 on: April 07, 2014, 03:43:01 PM »

U, me, taxi driver. Show me where chappy publicly stated he wants to go where bomber is, before draft day. Adams wanted to go to punt road, doesn't mean he ended up here or anyone for that matter


If we went hard and failed so be it fine, but we didn't because the powers at be think we are locked and loaded in our F50 with the fantasy island brigade we have down there at punt road

Gee I don't know but maybe it had something to do with the fact as soon as Bomber was made coach he said wouldn't mind going there and then low and behold the Bombers made him an offer

As for Adams in the end he choose the Pies so he really didn't want to come to the Tigers.
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Coach

  • Hardly A Prude
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8719
  • Depend on Schulzy
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #213 on: April 07, 2014, 06:12:15 PM »
I guess Richmond just sit and wait until a player comes out and says they "wouldn't mind" playing for us before we get off our arse and make an offer.

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #214 on: April 07, 2014, 07:47:09 PM »

U, me, taxi driver. Show me where chappy publicly stated he wants to go where bomber is, before draft day. Adams wanted to go to punt road, doesn't mean he ended up here or anyone for that matter


If we went hard and failed so be it fine, but we didn't because the powers at be think we are locked and loaded in our F50 with the fantasy island brigade we have down there at punt road

Gee I don't know but maybe it had something to do with the fact as soon as Bomber was made coach he said wouldn't mind going there and then low and behold the Bombers made him an offer

As for Adams in the end he choose the Pies so he really didn't want to come to the Tigers.
For Adams, we weren't prepared to pay the coin which was reportedly $400k.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #215 on: April 07, 2014, 09:05:13 PM »

U, me, taxi driver. Show me where chappy publicly stated he wants to go where bomber is, before draft day. Adams wanted to go to punt road, doesn't mean he ended up here or anyone for that matter


If we went hard and failed so be it fine, but we didn't because the powers at be think we are locked and loaded in our F50 with the fantasy island brigade we have down there at punt road

Gee I don't know but maybe it had something to do with the fact as soon as Bomber was made coach he said wouldn't mind going there and then low and behold the Bombers made him an offer

As for Adams in the end he choose the Pies so he really didn't want to come to the Tigers.
For Adams, we weren't prepared to pay the coin which was reportedly $400k.

Which is further proof the kid didn't want to come the RFC, he was chasing coin and sold himself to the highest bidder  ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #216 on: April 07, 2014, 09:08:38 PM »

U, me, taxi driver. Show me where chappy publicly stated he wants to go where bomber is, before draft day. Adams wanted to go to punt road, doesn't mean he ended up here or anyone for that matter


If we went hard and failed so be it fine, but we didn't because the powers at be think we are locked and loaded in our F50 with the fantasy island brigade we have down there at punt road

Gee I don't know but maybe it had something to do with the fact as soon as Bomber was made coach he said wouldn't mind going there and then low and behold the Bombers made him an offer

As for Adams in the end he choose the Pies so he really didn't want to come to the Tigers.
For Adams, we weren't prepared to pay the coin which was reportedly $400k.

Which is further proof the kid didn't want to come the RFC, he was chasing coin and sold himself to the highest bidder  ;D
To be fair to the kid, he just wanted to come home. His manager would have been the one trying to get him the best deal - they work off commission you know! In the end Maggie's had plenty of room with Daisy and Shaw leaving.
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #217 on: April 07, 2014, 10:41:16 PM »

U, me, taxi driver. Show me where chappy publicly stated he wants to go where bomber is, before draft day. Adams wanted to go to punt road, doesn't mean he ended up here or anyone for that matter


If we went hard and failed so be it fine, but we didn't because the powers at be think we are locked and loaded in our F50 with the fantasy island brigade we have down there at punt road

Gee I don't know but maybe it had something to do with the fact as soon as Bomber was made coach he said wouldn't mind going there and then low and behold the Bombers made him an offer

As for Adams in the end he choose the Pies so he really didn't want to come to the Tigers.
For Adams, we weren't prepared to pay the coin which was reportedly $400k.

Which is further proof the kid didn't want to come the RFC, he was chasing coin and sold himself to the highest bidder  ;D
I wrote this the other day but it seems to be the same OLD people making up the same OLD excuses for our recruiting. Take a bloody risk Tigers. Grigg would be on 300k/350k IMO, get rid of him and find anther $50k and we have a ten year player that has a decent crack in Adams. Really not that hard if you want to make things work.
Stop making excuses for a mediocre club when it comes to tough decisions.

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #218 on: April 07, 2014, 10:42:59 PM »
Chapman is 32. Seriously what's the point in bringing a 32 year old with paper hamstrings to the club ?
 We have some talented kids on the list. Give a couple of them a go. And when I say a go , I don't mean what they did to McDonut. One game and then out. That's just crap.

Great post. Chappy going ok at the Bombers. Pretty good fit there but the last thing we needed was another set of old legs.

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #219 on: April 07, 2014, 10:49:24 PM »
Chapman will break down mid year.
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 19433
  • RWNJ / Leftist Snowflake - depends who you ask....
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #220 on: April 07, 2014, 11:06:28 PM »
Chapman will break down mid year.

.....hopefully in tears after half his teammates are banned.
"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #221 on: April 07, 2014, 11:24:14 PM »
One injury away from disaster.
Honeymoon period is always good.
Once the honey goes your left with a moon and it just keeps getting bigger and bigger until it sits on your face and smothers you.

the claw

  • Guest
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #222 on: April 07, 2014, 11:27:39 PM »
The only reason we should be discussing Paul Chapman is to talk about that the Cats know when to move on their older players.

Chapman has been in great form, but Geelong have slowly introduced a new batch of kids and haven't missed a beat.

It's time the Tigers got ruthless with a few players and backed their kids.
i disagree with this.

imo geelong have it wrong.  chapman would easily be in their best 10 still yet alone 22 and isnt stopping them playing any kid. where does this myth come from why do people think playing chapman and playing kids is mutually exclusive.
does enright still get games.  or kelly or bartel or stokes arent they keeping kids out of games which quite frankly hasnt happened at geelong anyway. their kids have got games despite the abundance of outstanding mature players because they have shown enough and performed well enough at vfl level and when they play seniors.ffs if chapman is not rubbed out they probably win a preliminary final and play off in the g/f.
this bloke massively influenced games when he came back from his hammys last yr and he has massively influenced games this yr.

here we are a club coming off finals and looking to do better and we cant even look at a high quality player who would replace a hack like jake king in the side.and address a serious list need. instead we went after blokes like banfield and lloyd, i have to ask  is chappy keeping a kid out at essendon of course not. is fletcher keeping a kid out or are they going to lose kids because of em absolutely not.
is matt thomas keeping arnot out of our side what a dumb way to look at it. blokes like shane edwards are  keeping arnot out.




 im all for giving blokes like miles arnot helbig elton a game and we stop gifting games to blokes constantly underperforming in the seniors . but lets not jkid ourselves about the majority of our juniors. these  kids in the main are nothing like geelongs and have not earnt a game.

what juniors are we going to play, our juniors aged 21 and under are.
conca - imo should be dropped hes so out of form. he is one junior regularly getting games.
arnot
darrou
ellis regular
elton
lennon been injured,
mcbean
mcdonough
mcintosh
ohanlon
vlastuin - regular
williams
outside of the regulars who are the rest going to replace and out perform.
its not quality players keeping juniors and development players out of our side its hacks like grigg king petterd edwards etc.

and to the poster who clearly hasnt watched chappy over the yrs or done a shred of homework on him and his injuries. he doesnt have paper hammies and he is remarkably resiliant when it comes to injuries. hes played a minimum of 19 games every yr from 2003 to 2012. the only significant amount of time he has missed games was last yr when the cats admitted they bought him back too early from his initial hamstring injury. he hasnt missed a game since.

the thing we most need is quality he is a good fit at essendon and he would be an even bbetter fit with us.

if we had gone and got quality like essendon did with chappy and goddard i have no doubt we would be 3 and 0 with finals a real possibility. but hey it seems posters think medicre plauyers will take us further. they prefer to see the likes of king and edwards running around.





« Last Edit: April 07, 2014, 11:43:13 PM by the claw »

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #223 on: April 08, 2014, 06:32:03 AM »
The only reason we should be discussing Paul Chapman is to talk about that the Cats know when to move on their older players.

Chapman has been in great form, but Geelong have slowly introduced a new batch of kids and haven't missed a beat.

It's time the Tigers got ruthless with a few players and backed their kids.
i disagree with this.

imo geelong have it wrong.  chapman would easily be in their best 10 still yet alone 22 and isnt stopping them playing any kid. where does this myth come from why do people think playing chapman and playing kids is mutually exclusive.
does enright still get games.  or kelly or bartel or stokes arent they keeping kids out of games which quite frankly hasnt happened at geelong anyway. their kids have got games despite the abundance of outstanding mature players because they have shown enough and performed well enough at vfl level and when they play seniors.ffs if chapman is not rubbed out they probably win a preliminary final and play off in the g/f.
this bloke massively influenced games when he came back from his hammys last yr and he has massively influenced games this yr.

here we are a club coming off finals and looking to do better and we cant even look at a high quality player who would replace a hack like jake king in the side.and address a serious list need. instead we went after blokes like banfield and lloyd, i have to ask  is chappy keeping a kid out at essendon of course not. is fletcher keeping a kid out or are they going to lose kids because of em absolutely not.
is matt thomas keeping arnot out of our side what a dumb way to look at it. blokes like shane edwards are  keeping arnot out.




 im all for giving blokes like miles arnot helbig elton a game and we stop gifting games to blokes constantly underperforming in the seniors . but lets not jkid ourselves about the majority of our juniors. these  kids in the main are nothing like geelongs and have not earnt a game.

what juniors are we going to play, our juniors aged 21 and under are.
conca - imo should be dropped hes so out of form. he is one junior regularly getting games.
arnot
darrou
ellis regular
elton
lennon been injured,
mcbean
mcdonough
mcintosh
ohanlon
vlastuin - regular
williams
outside of the regulars who are the rest going to replace and out perform.
its not quality players keeping juniors and development players out of our side its hacks like grigg king petterd edwards etc.

and to the poster who clearly hasnt watched chappy over the yrs or done a shred of homework on him and his injuries. he doesnt have paper hammies and he is remarkably resiliant when it comes to injuries. hes played a minimum of 19 games every yr from 2003 to 2012. the only significant amount of time he has missed games was last yr when the cats admitted they bought him back too early from his initial hamstring injury. he hasnt missed a game since.

the thing we most need is quality he is a good fit at essendon and he would be an even bbetter fit with us.

if we had gone and got quality like essendon did with chappy and goddard i have no doubt we would be 3 and 0 with finals a real possibility. but hey it seems posters think medicre plauyers will take us further. they prefer to see the likes of king and edwards running around.
Agree completely! :clapping :clapping
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40319
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Paul Chapman?
« Reply #224 on: April 08, 2014, 07:08:12 AM »
I wrote this the other day but it seems to be the same OLD people making up the same OLD excuses for our recruiting. Take a bloody risk Tigers. Grigg would be on 300k/350k IMO, get rid of him and find anther $50k and we have a ten year player that has a decent crack in Adams. Really not that hard if you want to make things work.
Stop making excuses for a mediocre club when it comes to tough decisions.

Firstly I am not that OLD  ;D

Seriously, I am not making excuses for the recruiters and the bloke who is in charge of list management (who BTW should be held accountable a bit more than a few others) but if a player doesn't want to come to the club then why bother chasing them if all they are after is the pay packet? They made an offer to Adams, he knocked it back. Pies offered more $$ he took that = done & dusted. And going by the way he's struggling at the Pies at the moment and the money he is reportedly on; then you have an argument that he is being over paid and have to ask is he worth that supposed $400k he is on at C'wood.

Can only imagine how this forum would be if Adams' was at the RFC, playing the way he is at the moment on the $$ he is reportedly on? Got no doubt the majority would be taking aim at the Club saying we've paid overs for another dud  ;D

I'm all for going after good players but weary about paying overs. Said it at trade time I would love to have seen the Club put up some decent players for trade to try and get a top 5 draft pick from somewhere. But as usual they didn't have the courage/guts to do that.
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)