Welcome everyone to One-Eyed Richmond's Tiger Forum Cheers from mightytiges and WilliamPowell.
you're taking out of context again yeahright.
Fore me a forward line of:hf: Knights Vickery Lennonf: McBean Riewoldt Edwardsmay go ok but McBean hasnt played a game and Lennon hasnt played either. So we have to hope they come through but on paper it looks ok.
Quote from: Rampstar on November 22, 2013, 09:02:06 AMFore me a forward line of:hf: Knights Vickery Lennonf: McBean Riewoldt Edwardsmay go ok but McBean hasnt played a game and Lennon hasnt played either. So we have to hope they come through but on paper it looks ok.I agree Rampstar. Though I would prefer S. Edwards over A.Edwards in that line up for diversity of skills.
Didn't claw say all through the year we lacked medium forwards except for Edwards but we never play him there. Now we have to many?
Quote from: Yeahright on November 22, 2013, 01:31:17 AMDidn't claw say all through the year we lacked medium forwards except for Edwards but we never play him there. Now we have to many?Well I think adding four in one draft period may be overkill - three in the draft (Lennon, Lloyd and Gordon) and upgrading Petterd - and that's what Claw is talking about.Try reading the list he put up before.
Quote from: Stripes on November 22, 2013, 11:01:46 AMQuote from: Rampstar on November 22, 2013, 09:02:06 AMFore me a forward line of:hf: Knights Vickery Lennonf: McBean Riewoldt Edwardsmay go ok but McBean hasnt played a game and Lennon hasnt played either. So we have to hope they come through but on paper it looks ok.I agree Rampstar. Though I would prefer S. Edwards over A.Edwards in that line up for diversity of skills.I had assumed it must of been Shane EdwardsKing off the benvh