Author Topic: Changes for the Bombers game?  (Read 8759 times)

Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #30 on: May 25, 2014, 01:37:09 PM »
INS: Petterd, Miles, Arnott,

OUTS: Jackson (inj), McDonough, Thomas or Ellis

Maric needs another week, huge step up from VFL to AFL needs more match fitness

McDonough is probably a tough call but what stood out yesterday is in the clinches he decision making is very slow. Great example was right in front of us and he stood back believing the ball was going out of bounds, it didn't and it was until his opponent ran past him he decided to go after the ball. It didn't look good, it wasn't good = poor decision, slow decision

Thomas, well just butchers the ball and puts his teammates under ridiculous pressure with his poor disposal. Said it before will say it Gaian he must play to his obvious limitations

As for Ellis, don't let the 25+ possessions fool you! Yet again stood back off contests, refused to chase, and chimes on the with those little "dinky" nothing kicks.

Neither Ellis or Thomas will be dropped because they are favourites but I can dream can't I?   ;D
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline big tone

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 4404
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #31 on: May 25, 2014, 01:52:39 PM »
INS: Petterd, Miles, Arnott,

OUTS: Jackson (inj), McDonough, Thomas or Ellis

Maric needs another week, huge step up from VFL to AFL needs more match fitness

McDonough is probably a tough call but what stood out yesterday is in the clinches he decision making is very slow. Great example was right in front of us and he stood back believing the ball was going out of bounds, it didn't and it was until his opponent ran past him he decided to go after the ball. It didn't look good, it wasn't good = poor decision, slow decision

Thomas, well just butchers the ball and puts his teammates under ridiculous pressure with his poor disposal. Said it before will say it Gaian he must play to his obvious limitations

As for Ellis, don't let the 25+ possessions fool you! Yet again stood back off contests, refused to chase, and chimes on the with those little "dinky" nothing kicks.

Neither Ellis or Thomas will be dropped because they are favourites but I can dream can't I?   ;D
Im so happy that you see what I see regarding Ellis.
I disagree on Thomas in terms of I love the way he plays, we are so timid as I side and have been for way to long. He puts his head over it and that's ok by me. I didn't notice his disposal yesterday which usually means it was ok.
I'll buy another membership if they drop Ellis and bring in Miles. Miles didn't rack up 30 yesterday but was still in the best players. Sometimes stats are misleading!

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #32 on: May 25, 2014, 02:16:19 PM »
INS: Petterd, Miles, Arnott,

OUTS: Jackson (inj), McDonough, Thomas or Ellis

Maric needs another week, huge step up from VFL to AFL needs more match fitness

McDonough is probably a tough call but what stood out yesterday is in the clinches he decision making is very slow. Great example was right in front of us and he stood back believing the ball was going out of bounds, it didn't and it was until his opponent ran past him he decided to go after the ball. It didn't look good, it wasn't good = poor decision, slow decision

Thomas, well just butchers the ball and puts his teammates under ridiculous pressure with his poor disposal. Said it before will say it Gaian he must play to his obvious limitations

As for Ellis, don't let the 25+ possessions fool you! Yet again stood back off contests, refused to chase, and chimes on the with those little "dinky" nothing kicks.

Neither Ellis or Thomas will be dropped because they are favourites but I can dream can't I?   ;D

Haha you want Petterd in the side
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #33 on: May 25, 2014, 02:18:41 PM »
Yeah he's a faster thinker unlike donuts  :whistle

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #34 on: May 25, 2014, 05:36:39 PM »
Reckon Petterd is a certainty to play next week

Offline bojangles17

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5618
  • Platinum member 33 years
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #35 on: May 25, 2014, 06:08:16 PM »
INS: Petterd, Miles, Arnott,

OUTS: Jackson (inj), McDonough, Thomas or Ellis

Maric needs another week, huge step up from VFL to AFL needs more match fitness

McDonough is probably a tough call but what stood out yesterday is in the clinches he decision making is very slow. Great example was right in front of us and he stood back believing the ball was going out of bounds, it didn't and it was until his opponent ran past him he decided to go after the ball. It didn't look good, it wasn't good = poor decision, slow decision

Thomas, well just butchers the ball and puts his teammates under ridiculous pressure with his poor disposal. Said it before will say it Gaian he must play to his obvious limitations

As for Ellis, don't let the 25+ possessions fool you! Yet again stood back off contests, refused to chase, and chimes on the with those little "dinky" nothing kicks.

Neither Ellis or Thomas will be dropped because they are favourites but I can dream can't I?   ;D
More fool those that would drop Thomas, he was clearly amongst best 3 on the ground , instrumental with his contested ball dominance , arnot needs more than 12 possies in the vfl to knock thomo from the side  :shh
RFC 1885, Often Imitated, Never Equalled

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #36 on: May 25, 2014, 06:15:57 PM »
INS: Petterd, Miles, Arnott,

OUTS: Jackson (inj), McDonough, Thomas or Ellis

Maric needs another week, huge step up from VFL to AFL needs more match fitness

McDonough is probably a tough call but what stood out yesterday is in the clinches he decision making is very slow. Great example was right in front of us and he stood back believing the ball was going out of bounds, it didn't and it was until his opponent ran past him he decided to go after the ball. It didn't look good, it wasn't good = poor decision, slow decision

Thomas, well just butchers the ball and puts his teammates under ridiculous pressure with his poor disposal. Said it before will say it Gaian he must play to his obvious limitations

As for Ellis, don't let the 25+ possessions fool you! Yet again stood back off contests, refused to chase, and chimes on the with those little "dinky" nothing kicks.

Neither Ellis or Thomas will be dropped because they are favourites but I can dream can't I?   ;D
More fool those that would drop Thomas, he was clearly amongst best 3 on the ground , instrumental with his contested ball dominance , arnot needs more than 12 possies in the vfl to knock thomo from the side  :shh

Better than Jack, Lids, Dusty, Rance, Conca, Hampson,Houli.

Yep clearly amongst the best 3 at 74% efficiency.

I may be seen as a perfectionist but I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week. Whoa. :shh


Offline WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 40205
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #37 on: May 25, 2014, 07:05:13 PM »

Better than Jack, Lids, Dusty, Rance, Conca, Hampson,Houli.

Yep clearly amongst the best 3 at 74% efficiency.

I may be seen as a perfectionist but I'll take quality over quantity any day of the week. Whoa. :shh

Exactly  :clapping
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Rampstar

  • Guest
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #38 on: May 25, 2014, 07:06:50 PM »
Reckon they might drop McDonough back next week for Petterd
If Ivan plays .Vickery or Griffiths one has to go

from what I been told the Donut was poor yesterday which is disappointing.
Poor?
He wasn't poor at all. Made a couple of errors but also took the game on and set up a few plays. Wasn't our worst. Kicked his first goal for us too. Backmen kicking goals is a bonus.

I didnt see the game I took your advice and decided to do other things so I could keep my blood pressure at reasonable levels  ;D

Online RedanTiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #39 on: May 25, 2014, 07:22:31 PM »
In: Maric, Petterd, Arnot
Out: Griffith, Jackson, Foley

While it's not what I would do, the coaching panel will drop Foley since he was only the sub and Arnot can do that. Maric is still not fit enough so they will bring him in early and drop a ruck and so Griffith must go as he's not a possible key forward like Vickery. Griffith can also pinch hit in defence if we have an injury so he's got to go. Jackson is doubtful and may well play half-fit but if not then the reliable Petterd comes in to give his usual qualities.   :facepalm 

Offline YellowandBlackBlood

  • Long suffering….
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10688
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #40 on: May 25, 2014, 07:26:06 PM »
Reckon they might drop McDonough back next week for Petterd
If Ivan plays .Vickery or Griffiths one has to go

from what I been told the Donut was poor yesterday which is disappointing.
Poor?
He wasn't poor at all. Made a couple of errors but also took the game on and set up a few plays. Wasn't our worst. Kicked his first goal for us too. Backmen kicking goals is a bonus.

I didnt see the game I took your advice and decided to do other things so I could keep my blood pressure at reasonable levels  ;D
You are a wise man Ramps. When Coniglio kicked their first to level the scores,  your BP may have hit 250 systolic! ;D
OER. Calling it as it is since 2004.

Offline MADTIGER2010

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #41 on: May 25, 2014, 07:36:31 PM »
Foolish to want McDonough, foley, Griffiths and Vickery out
Foolish to want Petterd in
5 moronic calls after yesterday. They all played well and all vital members of the team

Offline Mr Magic

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 6887
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #42 on: May 25, 2014, 07:38:16 PM »
Wouldn't make too many changes.
Perhaps Jacko for Miles (if injured) and that's about it.

Offline 1965

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5640
  • Don't water the rocks
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #43 on: May 25, 2014, 07:43:16 PM »
Wouldn't make too many changes.
Perhaps Jacko for Miles (if injured) and that's about it.

At last someone who makes sense.

 :thumbsup
Yeah we're already going to vote for him mate, you don't need to keep selling it.....

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Changes for the Bombers game?
« Reply #44 on: May 25, 2014, 08:00:38 PM »

I didnt see the game I took your advice and decided to do other things so I could keep my blood pressure at reasonable levels  ;D

Nor did I but for another reason.

I just hate them ;D
Caracella and Balmey.