Changes for the Bombers game?

[YellowandBlackBlood]

So is that Achilles for Cotch ?

No, rolled his ankle against Melbourne. He'll be right for Dreamtime.

[YellowandBlackBlood]

Who goes out, Hampson, griff or TV?

Hope it's not Griff. He seems to be the scapegoat all the time......

[Phil Mrakov]

So is that Achilles for Cotch ?

No, rolled his ankle against Melbourne. He'll be right for Dreamtime.

we should've rest him against GWS

[big tone]

Who goes out, Hampson, griff or TV?

Hope it's not Griff. He seems to be the scapegoat all the time......

Hampson goes for mine- played well last week but big deal. Move over for Big Ivan.
The other two offer more up forward..... Just!

[Diocletian]

Hamspud won't be dropped afer playing his one "good" game for the year and Hardwick will probably want two specialists against Essendon's rucks.  Should be Vickery but will be Griffiths.

[Jackstar is back!!!]

Griffiths will go

[Mr Magic]

Hoping like blazes that Vickery is the one out. His poor form leading up to the GWS game should be taken into account.

[WilliamPowell]

Hampson goes for mine- played well last week but big deal. Move over for Big Ivan.
The other two offer more up forward..... Just!

Hampson won't go

History tells us that selected players who have come in from other Clubs targeted under the BH recruiting model will not get dropped no matter how they have been playing (see exhibit A - Houli and exhibit B - Grigg)

Ty's already been dropped once so he is safe for the remainder of the season 

So therefore it will be Griffiths (wrongly BTW)

[Judge Roughneck]

Its a joke we are carrying hampson. Chaplin. Tyrone

Yet Griff will go

[Jackstar is back!!!]

Carrying Hampson
 
Don't think so

[one-eyed]

Jacko, when he was interview today, said he believes he'll get up to play on Saturday night. He had a scan and it was only a corky.

[Chuck17]

Jacko, when he was interview today, said he believes he'll get up to play on Saturday night. He had a scan and it was only a corky.

That's great news

[the claw]

Carrying Hampson
 
Don't think so

not in the ruck anyway.

i dunno is it just me being tooo sceptical but ffs neither griffiths or vickery have done much to keep their spots.  people talking griffiths up as if hes had some exceptional yr yet imo its only been marginally better than vickerys.  you could make a damn good case to drop both but alas there are no other options unless we wish to get a game into elton.

personally id prefer to see azza edwards get a game in front of vickery this week. wont happen though. only changes that will happen is from injury.

[(•))(©™]

It's more about how Griffiths, while still building on his output, has more presence, balls and desire THAN Vickery ALREADY.

[the claw]

It's more about how Griffiths, while still building on his output, has more presence, balls and desire THAN Vickery ALREADY.

i agree ox but hes hardly set the world on fire either.
forget vickery for a second. and i agree id rather cut vickery based on what you said,   if they dropped griffiths based on form and performance would it really surprise you if it happened.