Author Topic: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...  (Read 2811 times)

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2014, 08:41:47 AM »
Who did Grigg play on today?

Was it Wingard?

tagging boak?

how did he do the first time he tagged boak? few weeks ago

whats the definition of insanity?

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2014, 08:58:58 AM »
Who did Grigg play on today?

Was it Wingard?

tagging boak?

how did he do the first time he tagged boak? few weeks ago

whats the definition of insanity?

Only 10















per quarter

Jackstar is back!!!

  • Guest
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2014, 09:41:08 AM »
Thought Houli was good

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2014, 02:37:44 PM »
Thought Houli was good

Opposition side target his area coming out of defence cause they know he doesn't contest that well

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2014, 06:25:03 PM »
Who did Grigg play on today?

Was it Wingard?

tagging boak?

how did he do the first time he tagged boak? few weeks ago

whats the definition of insanity?

What's the definition of insanity? Doing the same things over and over and expecting different results. The Tigers got off to a bad start with two crucial blunders yesterday. W

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2014, 06:33:03 PM »
As I was saying before it cut me off. We made two crucial blunders:
Winning the toss and kicking against the wind :booboo
Playing Grigg as a tagger on Boak :banghead. I mean puh-lease!
Just 10 minutes of Boak being allegedly manned up by that soft tosser in place of a hard tag, and it was literally game over.
Seriously, Grigg couldn't tag an old pair of Levis hanging on a dead man's Hills hoist. Geez, I hope we wake up and de-list that useless tosser, and send Petterd and, Hampson packing with him as well.

Offline one-eyed

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 96130
    • One-Eyed Richmond
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2014, 06:40:39 PM »
Mark Robinson's view:

3. The future of some.
Finals uncover cracks and cracks become players. Hardwick will allow youth to feed off the experience, but he will have some concerns for Grigg (20 disposals, five contested), Foley (11 disposals), Newman (14 disposals), and Edwards just 11 disposals. He’s had a solid back end Edwards, but failed yesterday. Hardwick’s problem is deciding who to put a line through after yesterday. Am worried for Grigg and Foley to be honest.

http://www.news.com.au/national/herald-sun-chief-football-writer-mark-robinson-reveals-likes-and-dislikes-from-week-1-finals/story-e6frfkp9-1227051047544

Offline Phil Mrakov

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8213
  • They said I could be anything so I became Phil
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2014, 06:42:22 PM »
Hardwick delist Grigg?  :lol seriously we should be looking to trade this bloke to GWS. He's a massive dud
hhhaaarrgghhh hhhhaaarrggghhh hhhhaaaarrrggghh
HHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHAAARRRGGGHHHH HHHHHAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2014, 08:00:57 PM »
has newman relinquished his contract for 2014 yet or is it still all about him ?
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline WA Tiger

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14257
  • For We're From Tigerland
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2014, 08:36:17 PM »
 Should not of re-signed Edwards or Newman, should Have Edwards, Grigg and Foley on the trade table... :banghead

As much as I like Foley, unfortunately injuries have curtailed what could of been.

Edwards at least would appeal to other clubs.
DIMMA - You will be held ACCOUNTABLE...

“We are really excited about what we have brought in. We have got great depth of players that can take us where we need to go. We are just putting some cream on the top at the moment,” he said.

"Rucks:
Shaun Hampson is the No.1 man"

Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2014, 10:02:43 PM »
Houli was far from our worse

Yeah he was dreadfully good in the first quarter with his decision making. By the time he got over that the horse had not only bolted the whole farm had gone. :help

Offline torch

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 5304
  • 28YrM&8YrMRC 🏆🏆🏆 ‘17, ‘19-‘20; 2 x Attendee 🐯
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2014, 10:04:47 PM »
DELIST GRIGG!

Online WilliamPowell

  • Administrator
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 39257
  • Better to ignore a fool than encourage one
    • One Eyed Richmond
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2014, 10:05:58 PM »
DELIST GRIGG!

HE HAS A CONTRACT SO HE WONT BE DE-LISTED
"Oh yes I am a dreamer, I still see us flying high!"

from the song "Don't Walk Away" by Pat Benatar 1988 (Wide Awake In Dreamland)

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2014, 10:14:18 PM »
DELIST GRIGG!

HE HAS A CONTRACT SO HE WONT BE DE-LISTED

GO THE GRIGGSTERRRRRRRRR


Hellenic Tiger

  • Guest
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2014, 10:44:39 PM »
Trade Vickery to the Dogs or St.Kilda for picks. Throw in another half glass empty list clogger(s) that will get them competitive without improving them long term and we may get this over the line.