Author Topic: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...  (Read 2813 times)

Offline RollsRoyce

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2014, 11:07:26 PM »
DELIST GRIGG!

HE HAS A CONTRACT SO HE WONT BE DE-LISTED

IN THAT CASE LET HIM ROT IN THE RESERVES UNTIL HIS CONTRACT EXPIRES!!! SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO DISGRACE A RICHMOND JUMPER AGAIN. I DESPISE HIM.

Offline DCrane

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
  • Belle, Richmond PR manager
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #31 on: September 08, 2014, 11:10:59 PM »
Seriously, Grigg couldn't tag an old pair of Levis hanging on a dead man's Hills hoist.
:lol

IN THAT CASE LET HIM ROT IN THE RESERVES UNTIL HIS CONTRACT EXPIRES!!! SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO DISGRACE A RICHMOND JUMPER AGAIN. I DESPISE HIM.
:lol
Go Rollsy.
It's funny coz it's true.

Offline Tigerteam

  • Tiger Rookie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • For We're From Tigerland
    • Homefix Building Services
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2014, 11:48:04 PM »
Totally Agree

Grigg,,,DELIST...GONE

Houli... DELIST/TRADE...GONE

Vickery...TRADE...GONE

Thomas...DELIST...GONE

Newman...Needs to RETIRE...Gone

Petterd...DELIST...GONE

Hampson...TRADE...GONE

Chaplin...DELIST...GONE

Conca...TRADE...GONE

All these players do not fit the right mould. No real skill sets, slow , unco-ordinated - they need to be moved on...

We need to be brutal to be better and start recruiting hard nuts. You wanna play for Richmond you have to start playing like a hardnut with the skill set to be able to dance around opposition players.


Offline (•))(©™

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 8410
  • Dimalaka
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #33 on: September 09, 2014, 01:07:40 AM »
Sack some of the wankers at the club too
Caracella and Balmey.

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #34 on: September 09, 2014, 12:06:06 PM »
Houli was far from our worse

The last game doesn't matter so much

Over the course of the last couple years, for mine, houli is too squib like for the back line

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #35 on: September 09, 2014, 12:07:28 PM »
Seriously, Grigg couldn't tag an old pair of Levis hanging on a dead man's Hills hoist.
:lol

IN THAT CASE LET HIM ROT IN THE RESERVES UNTIL HIS CONTRACT EXPIRES!!! SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO DISGRACE A RICHMOND JUMPER AGAIN. I DESPISE HIM.
:lol
Go Rollsy.
It's funny coz it's true.

Its not funny

Its a stuffin shame

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #36 on: September 09, 2014, 12:22:34 PM »
Not defending Grigg coz I'd get rid of him too but it was Vlaustin who started on Boak. Grigg went to him once Boak had seen off Vlaustin. Made no difference.
 As for those ragging out Matt Thomas. I was wishing very early on in the game that he was playing. Port sure as hell wouldn't have waltzed the ball out the centre like they did if he was in there.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #37 on: September 09, 2014, 12:27:43 PM »
Yep Thomas would of at least had a crack

Might as well redraft Tim Flemming

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #38 on: September 09, 2014, 12:32:30 PM »
Yep Thomas would of at least had a crack

He would've got the ball going in our direction more than it did on Sunday. Probably wouldn't have mattered much though since our forward line was completely disfunctional. Some of that was a result of poor coaching though.
 I think we only had one or two less inside 50s in that first quarter. Hard to believe I know but it's true.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #39 on: September 09, 2014, 12:59:59 PM »
The issue is

It should not be grigg and thomas (such selection issues at tiger land

Ideally it's grigg or Thomas. (Or better yet...

Offline Chuck17

  • The Shaun Grugg of OER
  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #40 on: September 09, 2014, 01:23:18 PM »
Yep Thomas would of at least had a crack

He would've got the ball going in our direction more than it did on Sunday. Probably wouldn't have mattered much though since our forward line was completely disfunctional. Some of that was a result of poor coaching though.
 I think we only had one or two less inside 50s in that first quarter. Hard to believe I know but it's true.

Just about every one of our inside 50 went straight to their spare man who just loaded up the slingshot and let fly

Offline Dice

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 1357
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #41 on: September 09, 2014, 01:33:10 PM »
Just about every one of our inside 50 went straight to their spare man who just loaded up the slingshot and let fly

Yeh I know , it was hard to watch. Coaches and on field leaders didn't fix it. Game over.
Tanking has put the club where it's at - Paul Roos

Offline Judge Roughneck

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11132
  • Sir
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2014, 01:34:30 PM »
How do they have a spare back when hardwick is playing a seven man forward line  :whistle

Offline Diocletian

  • RFC Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18434
  • Proud Gang of Four member #albomustgo
Re: Blokes we don't need or more importantly, need to replace...
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2014, 02:31:17 PM »
People thinking Thomarse would've made a difference when two of the things that killed us were lack of pace and poor disposal. Not to mention the fact we were actually killing them in the clearances to start with, but giving it straight back. Yep Thomarse would've solved that problem. Funny stuff.

"Much of the social history of the Western world, over the past three decades, has been a history of replacing what worked with what sounded good...."

- Thomas Sowell


FJ is the only one that makes sense.