are you kidding? you think senior players like Richo, johnson, newman and co had nothing do with Wallace going.
Come on WP your better than that
Did you actually read what I wrote or did you just skim over it like you sometimes have a tendency to do
But will go through it all again
Pay attention to the timeline
Who could forget, all went down a few streets away from where I work in Port Melb, Hutchy was camped outside Gary March's office at the time.
Players went to the president, mutiny was supposedly on, Hutchy went on KB's show on SEN and said Wallace would be sacked later that morning
Fact is he was not sacked, players were put back in there box and told he wouldn't be sacked.
Craig Cameron fronted the media by the Dyer Statue and said Wallace was still coach.....and wasnt' being sacked
That is what happened, tail was not allowed to wag the dog....that was my point. Players wanted him gone but they didn't get their way... can I make it any clearer for you
Hutch was made to look like a goose which was an added bonus I thought
Later that season Wallace was sacked after a recommendation at board level.
That is what happened, did the players failed mutiny impact on the final decision made by the board? Prossibly but at the time the of the player led mutiny it was scuttled and the board didn't bow to the demands of the players